B04_140P5323Q0022_EVALUATION_Factors.pdf

PDF 126 KB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway VA CYCLIC VISTA CLEARING
Solicitation number
140P5324Q0007
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for cyclic vista clearing services along the Blue Ridge Parkway in Virginia. The contractor shall provide all labor, equipment, materials and supervision to complete road prism clearing and brushing as well as vista clearing. Services include lessening impacts on native species, reducing invasive plants, and enhancing scenic views from roadside parking areas and the roadway. The government intends to award a firm-fixed price contract to the technically acceptable offeror with the lowest price per FAR Part 12 and 15. The NAICS code is 561730 and the size standard is $9.5 million. Proposals are due by February 26, 2024.

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation 140P5323Q0022 GRSM HAZ/Vista Tree

EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS

This acquisition will utilize Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, as supplemented. Award will be made to the technically acceptable offeror with the lowest evaluated price, which is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation and whose offers meet all required terms and conditions, meet all technical requirements, conform to and include all required certifications. Technical acceptability will be evaluated on all offers. Only those offerors determined to be technically acceptable will be considered for award. Price will be evaluated on all technically acceptable offerors and the offers will be listed from lowest to highest price based on the total price including all CLINs and Options Items. Non-price factors are equal importance and failure to meet technical acceptability for any non-price factor will preclude award.

FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES

In order to be considered technically acceptable, an offeror must meet the minimum requirements set forth below. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable.

SUBFACTOR 1 – QUALIFICATIONS

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s qualifications to meet the government’s requirements to include the following:

1.1 Offeror’s personnel, and its subcontractors are skilled in the type of services required within the SOW including adequate number of skilled personnel who possess sufficient training and experience. This includes the offeror’s ability to meet safety requirements to include personnel trained in basic First Aid (meeting OSHA regulations), chainsaw, traffic control, and protection of the public. (Provide safety plan that relates to this requirement).

1.2 Evidence that the offerors personnel and its subcontractors, are qualified and licensed to operate any equipment proposed and in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local regulations (provide safety plan and/or certifications).

1.4 Evidence that the ability of offeror’s personnel, and its subcontractors, to field identify plant species and are familiar with the various species of plants listed in the contract log sheets. (Provide Personnel experience).

SUBFACTOR 2 – TECHNICAL APPROACH

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s technical approach to meet the Government requirements to include the following:

2.1 Offeror’s approach to meeting the vista clearing shape and standards; identifying plant species to ensure required treatment;

2.2 Management and oversight;

2.3 Quality Control; mitigate hazards to personnel and general public.

Solicitation 140P5323Q0022 GRSM HAZ/Vista Tree

2.4 The offeror shall provide evidence of specific methods and techniques for completing the requirements within the SOW to include: type, current condition, and age of fleet proposed, and number staff operators located in the SOW.

PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2). The Government will evaluate the offeror’s relevant (past 3 years) past performance with similar/equivalent experience to the requirements identified in this solicitation. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) in the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably.

PRICE

The Government will list offers from lowest to highest price of all offerors found technically acceptable and based on the total price including all CLINs and Options Items 1-3.

Objective: Determine whether an offeror’s proposal is technically acceptable.

BASIS FOR AWARD

Award will be made on the basis of lowest price technically acceptable per FAR 15.101-2.

Was the proposal technically acceptable based on the below findings: Pass/Fail rating will be used:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .