B.08.01 Forbes Aircraft Runway Ramp Repair Solicitation Final 7.30.2021.pdf

Repair Aircraft Parking Ramp: Construction Contract for Project No. GUQE 042100 Repair Aircraft Parking Ramp the 190th Air Refueling Wing, Kansas Air National Guard located at Forbes Field AFB, Topeka, KS.

This action is being solicited on an Unrestricted basis. The North American Industry Classif ication (NAICS) Code is 237310, the small business size standard is $39,500,000.00. A small business subcontracting plan w ill be required if the offeror is a large business and must be submitted w ith the offer.

The HUBZone price evaluation preference in accordance w ith FAR 19.1307 applies. The project magnitude is betw een $10,000,000.00 and $25,000,000.00.

Funds are not presently available for this contract. Currently, the Government anticipates funds w ill become available prior to but not later than midnight 30 September 2022. This action has been identif ied on the National Guard priority list for aw ard if funds become available and the prices received are w ithin an aw ardable range.

Aw ard w ill be made to the offeror w ho represents the best value to the Government as outlined in accordance w ith the criteria set forth w ithin the solicitation.

JOSEPH WEBER 785-861-4737

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

30-Jul-2021

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

Repair Aircraft Parking Ramp

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______30 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________30 Aug 2021 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

USPFO KS 190 MISSION SUPPORT CONTRACTING

5920 SE COYOTE DR BLDG 662

TOPEKA KS 66619-1429

W50S7Y

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

GUQE042100

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

W50S7Y21R6000 77

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Bid List 3

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job Repair Aircraft Runway

FFP

Provide all plant, labor, new and current material, transportation, tools, equipment, appliances, supplies, services, permits, insurance and supervision necessary to repair and replace aircraft parking aprons and taxiways to include partial depth and full depth reconstruction of approximately 24,000 square yards of PCC pavement, cold milling of AC pavement and AC pavement overlay that covers approximately 90,000 square yards.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Y1BD

NET AMT

BID SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF WORK AND PRICES,

SUMMARY

Item No.

Spec Section Description Approx.

Quantity

Unit Unit $ Price

Extended $ Amount

Base Bid Items

01 22 00.00 10

Mobilization and Demobilization (Including Badging, Barricades and Traffic Control)

JOB

01 57 19 Erosion Control 1 LS

01 57 19

Contaminated Soil Removal and Disposal of Material including Tests and Reports (Assumed Quantity)

CY

4 01 22 00.00 10 Remove and Dispose PCC Pavement(15.5" to 21" Depth)

23,980 SY

5 32 01 16.71 Cold Mill and Dispose AC Pavement(4" Depth)

64,556 SY

6 32 01 16.71 Cold Mill and Dispose AC Pavement(5" Depth)

26,200 SY

Bid List 4

31 00 00

Excavation and Disposal of Base and Excavated Material Under AC and PCC Pavement, Including Subgrade Preparation

3,250

CY

8 32 11 29 Lime Stabilized Subgrade (8" Thick)

25,080 SY

9 32 11 29 Lime for Stabilized Subgrade (6%)

181 Ton

32 11 23.23

Cement Stabilized Base Course Drainage Layer (6" Thick)

25,080

SY

11 31 05 19 Geotextile for Separation Layer

25,080 SY

12 32 11 23 Aggregate Base Course 100 CY

13 32 12 15 13 Asphalt Paving for Airfields 22,500 Ton

14 32 12 15.13 Fine Graded Asphalt Mix for Joint and Crack Filling

600 Ton

15 32 01 17.61 Joint and Crack Sealing in Underlying Pavement

40,000 LF

16 32 01 17.61 Saw-cut and Seal AC Pavement Joints

77,000 LF

32 13 14.13

Concrete Paving for Airfields Including Joint Sealants and Bond Breaker- Unreinforced (16" Thick)

24,370

W50S7Y21R6000

Item No.

Spec Section Description Approx.

Quantity

Unit Unit $ Price

Extended $ Amount

Concrete Paving for Airfields Including Joint Sealants and Bond Breaker- Reinforced (16" Thick)

32 17 23

Pavement Markings- Reflective Yellow, White & Red Color (with Glass Beads)

36,600

SF

32 17 23

Pavement Markings- Nonreflective Black and Other Colors

54,600

SF

33 40 00

Drainage Structure- Modified & Adjust to Grade Catch Basin with New Frame and Grate (14'L X 12'' W)

EA

22 33 46 16 Sub-drain Cleanouts 6 EA

33 46 16

Sub-drain Pipes- Perforated and Non-Perforated (6" Diameter)

LF

24 33 73 13 Grounding Points for Aircraft 60 EA

25 32 01 29.61 Patching Repair - PCC Partial Depth

3,990 SF

26 32 01 29.61 Patching Repair - PCC Full Depth (20" Thick)

627 SF

27 32 13 14.13 Full Depth PCC Slab Replacement (20" Thick)

140 SY

PCC Slab Replacement under AC Pavement Overlay (Variable Thickness)

29 32 01 19.61 Crack Sealing -PCC 850 LF

30 32 01 19.61 PCC Joint Resealing 11,463 LF

31 32 13 14.13 Existing PCC Diamond Grinding

38 SF

BASE BID - TOTAL $

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.219-4 NOTICE OF PRICE EVALUATION PREFERENCE FOR HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS

CONCERNS (MAR 2020)

(a) Definition. See 13 CFR 126.103 for the definition of HUBZone.

(b) Evaluation preference.

(1) Offers will be evaluated by adding a factor of 10 percent to the price of all offers, except--

(i) Offers from HUBZone small business concerns that have not waived the evaluation preference; and

(ii) Otherwise successful offers from small business concerns.

(2) The factor of 10 percent shall be applied on a line item basis or to any group of items on which award may be made. Other evaluation factors described in the solicitation shall be applied before application of the factor.

(3) When the two highest rated offerors are a HUBZone small business concern and a large business, and the evaluated offer of the HUBZone small business concern is equal to the evaluated offer of the large business after considering the price evaluation preference, award will be made to the HUBZone small business concern.

(c) Waiver of evaluation preference. A HUBZone small business concern may elect to waive the evaluation preference, in which case the factor will be added to its offer for evaluation purposes. The agreements in paragraphs

(d) and (e) of this clause do not apply if the offeror has waived the evaluation preference.

___ Offeror elects to waive the evaluation preference.

(d) Limitations on subcontracting. The Contractor shall spend--

(1) For services (except construction), at least 50 percent of the cost of personnel for contract performance on its own employees or employees of other HUBZone small business concerns;

(2) For supplies (other than procurement from a nonmanufacturer of such supplies), at least 50 percent of the cost of manufacturing, excluding the cost of materials, on the concern or other HUBZone small business concerns;

(3) For general construction--

(i) At least 15 percent of the cost of contract performance to be incurred for personnel on its own employees;

(ii) At least 50 percent of the cost of the contract performance to be incurred for personnel on its own employees or on a combination of its own employees and employees of HUBZone small business concern subcontractors;

(iii) No more than 50 percent of the cost of contract performance to be incurred for personnel on concerns that are not HUBZone small business concerns; or

(4) For construction by special trade contractors--

(i) At least 25 percent of the cost of contract performance to be incurred on its own employees;

(ii) At least 50 percent of the cost of the contract performance to be incurred for personnel on its own employees or on a combination of its own employees and employees of HUBZone small business concern subcontractors;

(iii) No more than 50 percent of the cost of contract performance to be incurred for personnel on concerns that are not HUBZone small business concerns.

(e) A HUBZone joint venture agrees that the aggregate of the HUBZone small business concerns to the joint venture, not each concern separately, will perform the applicable percentage of work requirements.

(f) Notice. The HUBZone small business offeror acknowledges that a prospective HUBZone awardee must be a HUBZone small business concern at the time of award of this contract. The HUBZone offeror shall provide the Contracting Officer a copy of the notice required by 13 CFR 126.501 if material changes occur before contract award that could affect its HUBZone eligibility. If the apparently successful HUBZone offeror is not a HUBZone small business concern at the time of award of this contract, the Contracting Officer will proceed to award to the next otherwise successful HUBZone small business concern or other offeror.

(End of clause)

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS,

EVALUATION CRITERIA, AND BASIS OF AWARD

1.0 GENERAL PROPOSAL INFORMATION

The proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing straightforward, concise delineation of capabilities to perform the contract. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear and coherent. All proposal information is to be submitted utilizing the English language.

The technical proposal shall address the offeror’s proposed approach to fully perform the requirements of the Request for Proposals (RFP). Offerors are discouraged from providing information not required by the RFP.

2.0 GENERAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

All offerors shall be required to submit a proposal with the minimum content as specified herein. Proposals without the minimum content may be rejected. Proposals will be received until the date and time indicated on Standard Form 1442 electronically at Joseph.Weber.7@us.af.mil

3.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

1. In order to be considered for award of a contract for the requirements of this solicitation, the offeror must submit a proposal with its offer. Failure to submit a complete proposal may result in the entire offer being rejected. The proposals shall be submitted in Volumes as follows:

VOLUME 1: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (Tabs A through C)

VOLUME 2: PRICE PROPOSAL (Tab A through B) consisting of an original signed Standard Form 1442 “Solicitation, Offer, and Award”; providing a price for all line items in the corresponding Price Proposal Schedule; and acknowledgment of all amendments to the solicitation and in Tab B - Pro Forma Requirements.

2. Proposal Characteristics

a) Each Volume shall contain a table of contents and all pages of each factor shall be sequentially numbered. All text must be legible and easily read. The page size of the offeror’s proposal shall not exceed 8-1/2 by 11 inches. Diagrams, charts and tables shall conform to the paper size. All text shall be typed single-spaced. Margins (1-inch) shall be clean and clear. If fold-out charts are unavoidable, and are to be utilized, all sheets shall be reproduced on 11 by 17 inch, and folded to 8-1/2 by 11 inch size. Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the offeror. Offerors shall limit Volume 1, Technical Proposal, to a maximum of 20 pages. Pages in excess of 20 will not be evaluated. Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) do not count toward the page count.

b) Each Volume of the proposal shall be identified by the Solicitation Number, project title, company name, address, and telephone number of the offer, and the following on the volume in bold letters:

VOLUME 1: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

VOLUME 2: PRICE PROPOSAL

c) The Proposal shall be organized by factors. They shall be described in separate sections, appropriately tabbed in a report form. All pages of each factor shall be sequentially numbered. Elaborate or lengthy presentations are not necessary or desirable. The Proposal’s clarity, organization and cross referencing are mandatory. No material shall be incorporated by reference. The Technical proposal shall not refer the reviewer to information contained in the Price proposal.

d) Additional Information to be provided in Volume 2. The following items should be submitted labeled

“Pro Forma Requirements”:

a. Offeror will submit a cover letter containing:

i. Solicitation number

ii. Name, address, email, and telephone and fax numbers of the offeror

iii. Names, title, email, and telephone and fax numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this RFP.

iv. Name, title and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal

v. A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions and provisions included in the RFP

b. For Joint Ventures, the information required by paragraph “Joint Ventures”

c. Include the Offeror’s DUNS number in block 14.

d. Acknowledgement of all amendments to the RFP in accordance with the instructions on the

Standard Form 30 (amendment form).

e. The completed Section 00 45 00 of the RFP (Representations and Certifications), including the ORCA certification from SAM Registration.

f. Bid Guarantee. See FAR 52.228-1.

g. Financial statement and bank letter that verifies that sufficient funds will be available to finance the work.

4.0 SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

A small business subcontracting plan will be required if the offeror is a large business and the plan must be submitted with the offer (proposal). The plan will be evaluated in accordance with AFARS Appendix DD. If the plan fails to be considered Acceptable using the criteria in AFARS Appendix DD, the plan must be revised or it will jeopardize offeror’s eligibility for contract award.

The Small Business Subcontracitng Goals are as follows:

Socio-Economic Category Target Percentage Offeror Percentage Small Business 72% ______ Small Disadvantageed Business 20% ______ Women Owned Small Business 9% ______ Service Disabled Veteran Owned 15.5% ______ HUBZone 7% ______

5.0 INQUIRIES/QUESTIONS

Bidder inquiries and questions relating to this solicitation shall be submitted to Joe Weber at Joseph.Weber.7@us.af.mil.

Bidder inquiries will be unavailable for new inquiries ten calendar days before proposal due date. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

6.0 JOINT VENTURES

Joint Ventures shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

1) A certified copy of their Joint Venture agreement.

2) A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages, where appropriate.

a. The relationship of the joint venture parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, and profit distribution or loss sharing.

b. The management approach of the joint venture in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise and control the project and have custody and control of the assets of the Joint Venture and perform the duties necessary to complete the work.

c. The structure of the joint venture and decision-making responsibilities of the Joint Venture parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of the work.

d. The bonding responsibilities of the Joint Venture parties.

e. Identification of the key personnel having authority to legally bind the Joint Venture to subcontracts and state who will provide or contract for the labor and materials for the Joint Venture.

f. Identification of party maintaining the Joint Venture bank accounts for the payment of all expenses and the deposits of all receipts, keep the books and records, and pay applicable taxes for the Joint Venture.

g. Identification of party furnishing the facilities, such as office supplies and telephone service.

h. Identification of party having overall control of the Joint Venture.

Other sections of the proposal shall identify, where appropriate, whether key personnel are employees of the individual Joint Venture parties and identify the party, or hired as employees of the Joint Venture.

If one of the Joint Venture parties possesses experience and/or past performance as a Federal Government contractor or as a National Guard contractor, that experience and/or past experience will be included as the experience and/or past experience of the Joint Venture.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

OCT 2016

252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements NOV 2020 252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a FIRM FIXED PRICE contract resulting from this solicitation.

(End of provision)

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority participation for each trade

Goals for female participation for each trade

9.0 6.9

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is Topeka, Kansas, Shawnee County.

52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States.

The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20 percent of the bid price or $3M, whichever is less.-

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

U.S. Property & Fiscal Office for Kansas, ATTN: Contracting Department, 2737 S. Kansas Ave. Topeka, KS 66611-1170.

National Guard Bureau, Office of the Director of Acquisitions, ATTN: NGB-AQ-O, 111 S. George Mason, Dr., Arlington, VA 22204, ng.ncr.ngb-arng.mbx.ngb-task-order-ombudsman@mail.mil

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for--

11 AUGUST 2021 1000 CST

(c) Participants will meet at-- Forbes 190th Air Refueling Wing, Kansas Air National Guard, Topeka, Kansas

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (NOV 2020)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (48 CFR Chapter 2) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SECTION VII

A. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

The proposal preparation instructions are contained in Section 21 16 of the Request for Proposal (RFP) and are herein incorporated by reference.

B. BASIS FOR AWARD

In accordance with FAR 15.101-2 the award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Proposals will be evaluated utilizing three technical (non-price) factors, Key Personnel, Past Performance and Corporate Experience and will be assessed on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, but will not be ranked. In order for an offeror to be considered for award, the proposal must receive an “Acceptable” rating on every non-price Factor. A proposal receiving a rating of “Unacceptable” in any non-price Factor will not be eligible for award.

TECHNICAL FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

A. VOLUME 1 TECHNICAL INFORMATION

Factor Location Description

FACTOR 1 VOLUME 1 TAB A CORPORATE EXPERIENCE

FACTOR 2 VOLUME 1 TAB B KEY PERSONNEL

FACTOR 3 VOLUME 1 TAB C PAST PERFORMANCE

B. V O L U M E 2 PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor Location Description FACTOR 4 VOLUME 2 TAB A PRICE (Standard Form 1442 and Price Proposal

Schedules)

FACTOR 4 VOLUME 2 TAB B PRO FORMA REQUIREMENTS

VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 1: CORPORATE EXPERIENCE

Submission Requirements

The offeror shall submit a project portfolio with a minimum of 3 similar projects and maximum of five (5) similar projects (only 3 is required) that have been completed by the offeror (prime construction contractor) in the last five years or substantially complete (90%) with a construction cost with a minimum $10 million in magnitude. Similar work under this criterion consists of firm fixed-price contracts for similar government or commercial runway repairs involving in-ground DOD fuel pits for large frame aircraft; completed within 5 years.

If the offeror represents the combining of two or more companies, state if this project represents a joint venture effort for the listed parties. If more than five (5) projects are submitted, only the first five (5) projects will be evaluated. Data presented shall be limited to two pages per project described. Use the following format to provide project information:

a. Project Title, Contract Number and Location.

b. Project Contract Type (for example, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity; Design-Bid-Build, Firm Fixed-Price, Cost Plus; Construction Manager at Risk, etc.)

c. Total Dollar Amount

d. Start and Completion Dates (Month/Year)

e. Role of Firm (address type of work performed, and percentage of work, as applicable) (also include any proposed team members that were directly involved in this project, including work performed, roles and responsibilities)

f. Brief Description of Project (address how this relates to this solicitation) Be sure to include:

i. Significant provisions taken to work in high security restricted areas by Offeror as a prime

Contractor or as a significant subcontractor.

ii. Please list the types of high security access and/or instances where you were permitted to work in high security restricted areas particularly for the Department of Defense.

iii. Examples of delays due to working in a high security area that your firm has experienced, and how you handled those delays effectively to keep the schedule and finish the work within the prescribed period of performance.

g. Customer Point of Contact (name, relationship to project, agency/firm affiliation, city, state, current phone number, and e-mail address)

h. Awards or recognition received, where applicable.

The offeror shall describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described in the project list. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the prime contractor and team members as relevant to their role on this project. If Corporate Experience is provided for the teaming member, instead of the prime construction contractor, a letter of commitment is required for it to be acceptable.

Evaluation Criteria

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s Corporate Experience based on the below evaluation criteria:

To receive an Acceptable rating for this factor the offeror must demonstrate all of the minimum requirements:

1. Minimum of 3 and no more than 5 construction projects (design for construction is not acceptable);

2. Projects must include horizontal construction of airfield pavements;

3. Similar Project Locations – i.e. Military Installation (Base) or Commercial Runway;

4. Projects that demonstrate familiarity with applicable UFC and local conditions;

5. Minimum construction contract cost of $10M.

6. Completed or substantially completed (90%) within the last 5 years. If the project is not complete, offeror must provide a narrative and supporting information that clearly demonstrate at least 90% complete (i.e.

construction schedule, interim CPARS, etc.).

TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Rating Definition Acceptable Proposal meets minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 2: KEY PERSONNEL

The offeror shall submit a resume for the following key personnel: Construction Superintendent, Project Manager and Civil Engineer. Provide enough detail on the resume to clearly identify the minimum requirements listed for each position.

Evaluation Criteria

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s Key Personnel based on the below evaluation criteria: To receive an Acceptable rating for this factor the offeror must demonstrate all of the minimum requirements:

1. Construction Superintendent: 5 years of construction experience on projects similar to the minimum requirements listed in factor 1 (Corporate Experience);

2. Project Manager:

a. PMP certification

b. Minimum of 5 Years of construction experience on projects similar to the minimum requirements listed in factor 1 (Corporate Experience);

3. Civil Engineer:

a. Valid Licensed Civil Engineer (P.E.) to work in Kansas

b. 5 years of experience on projects similar to the minimum requirements listed in factor 1 (Corporate

Experience);

TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Acceptable Proposal meets minimum key personnel requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum key personnel requirements of the solicitation.

VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

For each of the Factor 1 Projects, one or more completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) and/or final Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), should be submitted with your proposal. Past performance for each Factor 1 project is required to be acceptable. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror may have the client provide the PPQ. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. At the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Joseph Weber at Joseph.Weber.7@us.af.mil. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Past performance information shall be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.

To improve accuracy of database searches, the offeror will also provide the CAGE Codes for the prime contractor and all teaming partners, i.e. Joint Venture Partners, whose experience is relevant under Factor 1. The Government may contact and interview points of contact on the Past Performance Questionnaires. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed references, if the listed reference is not available.

Offerors with no past performance information will not be rated favorably or unfavorably and will receive a neutral rating.

At no time during this process, nor during the debriefing, nor after award, will the names of the individuals providing additional reference information about an offeror’s past performance be revealed to the offerors or to any other party. If discussions are held, offerors may be afforded the opportunity to respond to adverse comments made by references in accordance with guidelines identified in FAR Part 15.3. In this case, comments will be extracted and provided to the offeror. Copies of the questionnaires will not be furnished to the offeror and will remain confidential.

Evaluation Procedures

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

The past performance evaluation will result in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of successfully meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying construction services that meet the contract requirements. One performance confidence assessment rating is assigned for each offeror after evaluating the offeror's recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the contract requirements. In reviewing each past performance effort by the offeror, the SST will first evaluate the relevancy and recency of the projects.

An offeror’s past performance effort will be considered recent and relevant if it meets the minimum requirements for Technical Factor 1, Corporate Experience. Each past performance effort will be assigned one of the levels of relevancy shown in Table 1:

Table 1: Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition Relevant Past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities for the Corporate Experience factor.

Not Relevant Past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities for the Corporate Experience factor.

For each past performance effort, the SST will then evaluate how well the contractor performed on the contracts (Quality of Performance). The past performance evaluation will not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts. The Overall Rating for the performance record must be above a Marginal Rating to be Acceptable.

In conducting the performance confidence assessment, the offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings in Table 2.

Table 2: Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Confidence/Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence/Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

*Offerors without past performance will receive a rating of Neutral (i.e. Acceptable).

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NAVFAC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Title:

Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is the project relevant to project submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed:

8. Client’s Signature:

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance

E VG S M U N

with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

VOLUME 2 - FACTOR 4: PRICE PROPOSAL

Offerors shall submit the Price Proposal consistent with the CLINS included in the solicitation (Price Proposal Schedule). The Price Proposal Schedule consists of the original signed Standard Form 1442 “Solicitation, Offer, and Award”; providing a price for all line items in the corresponding bid schedule; and acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation. Proposed prices must be entered for all items of the Price Proposal Schedule.

Evaluation Criteria

The Price Evaluation Team (PET) will perform the price evaluation. Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of price analysis. The PET will evaluate the reasonableness of the price proposal using their expert judgment. The PET will also evaluate for unbalanced pricing. In the event, during the course of the analysis, the PET has reason to question the reasonableness of a price proposal, the PET may conduct such additional fair and reasonable analysis as it requires in order to complete a thorough price analysis. Because the evaluation of the price proposal will represent a portion of the total evaluation, it is possible that an offeror might not be selected because of an unreasonable price proposal. The price proposal will also be evaluated for completeness; all price information required by the RFP must be submitted.

Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-18 Prohibition on Contracting With Entities That Require Certain Internal…