AttD Reference Check Form.doc

DOC document 68 KB Posted

Attached to
RFP 5374 - STUDY OF OREGON PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Solicitation number
S-44300-00002878
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is a Reference Check Form for RFP 5374 - STUDY OF OREGON PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC issued by the State of Oregon, acting through the Oregon Health Authority - Public Health Division. The RFP is seeking services to conduct a study of the Oregon public health system's response to the Covid-19 pandemic as set forth in Senate Bill 1554 (2022). The contract is anticipated to be awarded to a single contractor. The Reference Check Form includes questions to be answered by reference entities regarding the type of services provided, customer service, problem resolution, satisfaction with the business relationship, and the likelihood of using the proposer's services again.

The related state and local contract opportunity is focused on the State of Oregon, with specific jurisdictions being Lane County and the City of Eugene. The contract will require the selected contractor to provide the goods or services outlined in the Scope of Work/Specifications Section 2.4 of the RFP.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

RFP #5374 – STUDY OF OREGON PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC

AttD OregonBuys Bid # S-44300-00002878

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Proposer Name:

Reference Entity:

Reference Contact Name:

Contact Telephone Number:

Contact Email Address:

Please respond to the following questions.

1. For what type of services did you engage Proposer?

2. Describe the services listed in response to question 1.

3. Describe Proposer’s customer service.

4. Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Proposer.

5. Describe Proposer’s methods for problem resolution.

6. How likely would you be to use Proposer’s services again?

7.

8. With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s services are you the most satisfied?

9.

10. With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s services are you the least satisfied?

11. How well did Proposer stay within the proposed timeline and budget?

Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .