Attch 2 RFI Q and A.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70T01026I7663N001
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) document attachment to a Request for Information (RFI) issued by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), a component of the Department of Homeland Security, for Fitness for Duty and Independent Medical Examinations (RFI #70T01026I7663N001). The document serves as a template for interested vendors to respond to eight specific questions designed to gather market research information regarding vendor capabilities, qualifications, and pricing recommendations.
The RFI requires vendors to submit company information (name, address, Unique Entity ID, point of contact, and business size classification), a capabilities statement addressing nationwide coverage and experience delivering fitness for duty independent medical examinations (limited to two pages), recommended labor categories with minimum qualifications, rough order of magnitude (ROM) cost estimates provided on a per-examination, per-hour, or total cost basis, and pricing recommendations with preference for firm-fixed pricing on a unit price per examination basis. Vendors must also identify any questions, suggestions, or concerns regarding the draft SOW, recommend meaningful technical evaluation factors for potential solicitation, and specify expected scheduling timeframes for examinations. All responses must not exceed seven pages total, including the two-page capabilities statement limit. The examinations must be consistent with TSA medical guidelines and include assessment of employee history, past medical treatment records, and current mental and physical status. This is a pre-solicitation market research effort and does not constitute a commitment to award; responses are voluntary and unpaid.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attch 1 SOW Fitness for Duty - Independent Medical Examinations- DRAFT 1.26.2026.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2 Q&A Document
RFI # 70T01026I7663N001
Fitness for Duty / Independent Medical Examinations
| Q&A Number |
| Question and Answer |
| Q1 |
| Provide the following information: |
a. Company Name
b. Company Address
c. Unique Entity ID
d. Point of Contact (Name, title, email, and phone number)
e. Business size, e.g. Large Business or Small Business (and status).
f. Relevant GSA Contract Number(s), if applicable.
g. Relevant Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWAC) or DHS Strategic Sourcing Vehicles, if applicable.
h. Potential subcontractors.
| A1 |
| Answers to Q1: |
a. _
b. _
c. _
d. _
e. _
f. _
g. _
h. _
| Q2 |
| Request for a capabilities statement (2-page limit). Specifically, address your organization’s ability to provide nationwide coverage and experience in developing and delivering Fitness for Duty Independent Medical Examinations. (Responses may be submitted in the space provided below or by a separate 2-page document) |
A2
| Q3 |
| What Labor Categories would you recommend for this work, and what are the minimum qualifications that would be expected to staff these requirements? |
A3
| Q4 |
| Provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate to perform the requirements of the SOW (cost per examination, per hour, and/or total cost). |
A4
| Q5 |
| The Government’s preference is for Firm-Fixed Pricing, would you recommend these services as a fixed unit price (FUP) contract? If so, please provide a ROM for a unit price per examination. |
A5
| Q6 |
| After reviewing the draft SOW, does your organization have any questions, suggestions, and/or concerns? |
A6
| Q7 |
| After reviewing the draft SOW, what does your organization recommend the Government use as meaningful technical evaluation factors for a potential solicitation? |
A7
| Q8 |
| When an examination is required in accordance with the draft SOW, what would the expected scheduling timeframe be for your organization? |
A8
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .