ATTACHMENTS for Sol 47PC0322R0010 for Domestic Water Piping Project 10052022.docx
DOCX document 377 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Design-Build for Domestic Water Piping Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 47PC0322R0010
About this file
This document package includes attachments for a solicitation requesting design-build services for domestic water piping repairs. The opportunity involves replacing domestic water piping and installing new systems to meet accessibility and water conservation standards at a GSA facility. Scope of work includes phased construction, plumbing fixture upgrades, solar water heating installation, sanitary pipe lining, cistern repairs, fire watch support, relocating impacted infrastructure, and commissioning the new water systems. The attachments provide templates for offerors to submit subcontracting goals, summarize relevant project experience, and provide key personnel resumes and references. The client agency is the General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 2.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT A1
SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION FORM
Name of Offeror: _______________________________________________
Large and small business offerors are required to submit proposed subcontracting goals for this contract. If this contract is awarded to a large business concern, it will be required to submit an acceptable subcontracting plan prior to award. The subcontracting plan must contain goals that are identical to or higher than the goals proposed on this form. Proposed subcontracting goals must be provided in percentages for the categories of subcontracting listed below:
Offeror ☐ is a small business concern ☐ is NOT a small business concern.
Please indicate the percentage of work you intend to perform with your own workforce: ___________ % *
Total % to be Subcontracted
Total % to be Subcontracted to Large Business
Total % to be Subcontracted to Small Business
% to Small Disadvantaged Business
% to Women-Owned Small Business
% to HUBZone Small Business
% to Veteran-Owned Small Business
% to Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
% Small Business Other
% Self Performed*
| Total |
| 100% |
| 100% |
| 100% |
| 100% |
| 100% |
*Percentage of Self Performed work must be greater than or equal to 15%
ATTACHMENT A2 – EXPERIENCE SUMMARY TABLE
Name of Offeror:
Project 1
Project 2
| Project 3 |
| Example Project |
(not a real project)
Project Name
Tower Office Building
Location (City, State, Country)
Hato Rey, Puerto Rico
Contract Amount ($ USD)
$15,000,000
Completion Date (Substantial Completion)
03 December 2015
Which elements of experience does the project demonstrate?
Construction of potable water piping replacement work for office buildings (Yes or No)
Yes
Construction for interior repairs within an occupied and operational multi-story building and multi-phase project (Yes or No)
Yes
Design-Build Project
Yes
Project minimum construction cost of USD 500,000.00 (Yes or No)
Yes
Project substantially completed within the past ten (10) years (Yes or No)
Yes
Construction with Federal Government (Yes or No)
Yes
ATTACHMENTS for Solicitation Package 47PC0322R0010
Attachment A3 – Project Fact Sheet Instructions: Complete all blocks. Limit the length to a maximum of three (3) pages per project, any information beyond the first three (3) pages will not be considered.
1. Name of Company that Performed this Work (this should be the name of your company, the Offeror)
Role (Prime G.C., C.M.C., Subcontractor, Joint-Venture Partner, etc.):
2. Name of Project
3. Location of Project
4. Project Owner Information 4a. Agency or Company Name
4b. Point of Contact (Name, Phone, and Email)
5. Date Started
6. Date Completed (Substantial Completion)
7. Contract Amount ($ USD)
8. Description of Project and Work Actually Performed by your Company
8a. Size of project (gross square feet) 8b. Project Photos (provide at least two (2))
8d. Narrative description of the Work, including the major disciplines and trades involved.
Make sure you identify the work you performed, the Work that you subcontracted, and whether any work was performed by others.
ATTACHMENT A4 – KEY PERSONNEL RESUME
ATTACHMENT A5 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PBS PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor/Offeror to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR INFORMATION
Firm Name: Address:
Phone Number: Duns Number:
Contact Name Email Address:: Contact Phone Number:
| 2. GENERAL WORK INFORMATION | ||||
| Work performed as | Prime Contractor | Sub Contractor | Joint Venture | Other (Please explain): |
Percent (%) of project work performed:
If a subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. CONTRACT INFORMATION
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please explain) Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:
| 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION | |||
| The complexity of Work: | High | Med | Routine |
How is this project relevant to the project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLIENTS COMPLETING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE: PBS requests that the client complete this questionnaire and submits it directly back to the Offeror. The Offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to PBS with their proposal and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on PBS solicitations. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the Offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to PBS. Please contact the Offeror for PBS POC information. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.
PBS Past Performance Questionnaire July 2014
Use the following adjective ratings and definitions in your evaluation of the Contractor's performance.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| NOTE |
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (V.G.) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's/Owner's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems or major problems that the Contractor recovered from without impact on the Contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per D.O.D. policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the Contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your Contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CLIENT
CLIENT INFORMATION
Client Point of Contact Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number: Email Address:
Project Information Contract Type: Contract Title: Contract Location:
Describe your role in the project:
Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
Client's Signature:
Instructions: Please select the adjective rating that best reflects your evaluation of the Contractor's performance.
| 1. QUALITY: | |||||
| E | V.G. | S | M | U | N |
(a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts.
(b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance.
(c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
(d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance).
| 2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: | |||||
| E | V.G. | S | M | U | N |
(a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.)
(b) Rate the Contractor's use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the Contract.
| 3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: | |||||
| E | V.G. | S | M | U | N |
(a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
(b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication).
(c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
(d) Overall customer satisfaction.
| 4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR | |||||
| E | V.G. | S | M | U | N |
(a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
(b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort.
| 4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR - Continued | |||||
| E | VG | S | M | U | N |
(c) Government Property Control.
(d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel.
(e) Utilization of Small Business concerns.
(f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines.
(g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes.
(h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).
| 5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT | |||||
| E | V.G. | S | M | U | N |
(a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
(b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
(c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, or a CMc/CMc at Risk Contract, please rate the Contractor's timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns).
| (d) Is the Contractor's accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? (If no, please explain in comment section below.) | |
| Yes | No |
(e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this Contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.)
Yes No
| (f) Have there been any indications that the Contractor has had any financial problems? (If yes, please explain in the comment section below.) | |
| Yes | No |
| 6. SAFETY/SECURITY | |||||
| E | V.G. | S | M | U | N |
(a) To what extent was the Contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.).
(b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
| 7. GENERAL | |||||
| E | V.G. | S | M | U | N |
(a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying C.O.R., PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
(b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (If there were specific issues, please explain in the comments sections below
(c) In summary, provide an overall rating for the Work performed by this Contractor.
8. SUSTAINABILITY
Did this project include sustainable methods, materials, processes or certifications? (See Whole Building Design Guide for acceptable requirements. Link to guide WBDG Green Building Standards and Certification Systems.) (If yes, please explain in the comments section below.)
Yes No
9. SUMMARY
| Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain in the comments section below.) | |
| Yes | No |
COMMENTS SECTION
Please provide additional information below, and attach additional pages if necessary.
Please provide responses to the above questions (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Also please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
image1.png image3.png image2.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .