Attachment L-001- Past Performance-Customer Satisfaction Survey- 697DCK-24-R-00288.pdf
PDF 738 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-24-R-00288
About this file
This document is an Attachment L-001 - Past Performance Customer Satisfaction Survey for Solicitation 697DCK-24-R-00288 for Lawn Maintenance Services at the FAA Midway Airport Air Traffic Control Tower in Chicago, IL and the Downers Grove RCAG site in Woodridge, IL.
The survey requests the customer/point of contact to provide information on the past performance of the interested offeror, including project details, responsiveness, problem-solving, contract management, quality of service, and overall customer satisfaction. The survey also asks about any labor, safety, or security investigations, terminations, or other performance issues. The solicitation is a firm, fixed-price procurement set as a Total Small Business Set-Aside, with a NAICS code of 561730 - Landscaping Services. The due date for proposals is not specified, but the survey responses must be submitted by April 23, 2024 to the FAA Contracting Officer. A site visit is scheduled for April 16, 2024, and all questions must be emailed to the Contracting Officer by April 18, 2024.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment L-001
PAST PERFORMANCE
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY
Solicitation 697DCK-24-R-00288
Instructions: Interested offeror is to submit survey to past references. Completed surveys must be submitted by reference, via email directly to the FAA point of contact listed below.
To: ____________________ (Customer/Point of Contact) ____________________ (Company) ____________________ (Phone) ____________________ (Email)
The Federal Aviation Administration is currently evaluating _____________________ (interested offeror) and you were listed as a performance reference. It would be greatly appreciated if you would take 5 or 10 minutes to complete the following information and return to me via email by April 23th, 2022 to alicia.prince@faa.gov.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Alicia Prince Contracting Officer Federal Aviation Administration alicia.prince@faa.gov
Page 1 of 5 Version 1.0, Dated 4/8/2024 mailto:alicia.prince@faa.gov mailto:alicia.prince@faa.gov
Please identify the project(s) that this company has performed for your organization, description, city, state, and approximate dollar value:
Respond to the following on a scale of 1 to 5, with 3 being Acceptable, and 5 being Outstanding.
1. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems? 1 2 3 4 5
2. To what extent did the contractor respond positively and promptly to technical direction, contract change orders, etc.? 1 2 3 4 5
3. How reliably did the contractor follow through on commitments?
1 2 3 4 5
4. To what extent did the contractor’s management system provide visibility into problems and risks?
1 2 3 4 5
5. How responsive do you think the contractor was to information requests, issues, or problems during the course of the contract? 1 2 3 4 5
6. How effective has the contractor been in identifying user requirements?
1 2 3 4 5
7. To what extent did the contractor have the ability to administer and manage the contract?
1 2 3 4 5
8. To what extent did the contractor issue professional correspondence?
1 2 3 4 5
9. How well did the contractor adhere to the Statement of Work? 1 2 3 4 5
10. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s management and support staff?
1 2 3 4 5
11. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s Supervisor(s)?
1 2 3 4 5
12. To what extent did the contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner? 1 2 3 4 5
Page 2 of 5 Version 1.0, Dated 4/8/2024
13. To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete?
1 2 3 4 5
14. To what extent was the contractor’s maintenance and problem tracking/reporting documentation timely, accurate and of appropriate content?
1 2 3 4 5
15. To what extent did the contractor comply with safety requirements?
1 2 3 4 5
16. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s overall quality of service?
17. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Government staff?
18. What was your level of overall customer satisfaction? 1 2 3 4 5
19. To what extent were the contractor’s employees experienced and qualified?
Page 3 of 5 Version 1.0, Dated 4/8/2024
Respond: Yes or No.
20. Were there any cure notices issued? Yes: ____ No: ____
21. Was contractor pro-active? Yes: ____ No: ____
22. Did contractor suggest cost-saving changes? Yes: ____ No: ____
23. Would you recommend this contractor? Yes: ____ No: ____
For Federal contracts:
24. Were there any Labor Department Investigations? Yes: ____ No: ____
24a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
25. Were there any safety investigations? Yes: ____ No: ____
25a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
26. Were there any security investigations? Yes: ____ No: ____
26a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
27. Was there a partial or complete termination for default or convenience?
Yes: ____ No: ____ 27a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
28. Are there any pending terminations? Yes: ____ No: ____
29. What is/was the duration of the contract? _____________________
Page 4 of 5 Version 1.0, Dated 4/8/2024
30. Were there any performance issues regarding the contractor’s work? If yes, please describe.
Please provide other comments:
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____________________________
Page 5 of 5 Version 1.0, Dated 4/8/2024
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .