Attachment J8-Incentive and Monitoring Framework.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SOL72065620R00008
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 02 Final.pdf | ||
| Amend 01.pdf | ||
| Revised Attachment J8-Incentive and Monitoring Framework.pdf | ||
| Attachment Amend_72065620R00008.pdf | ||
| Attachment J10-CHEGAR CRM Matrix Summary.pdf | ||
| Attachment J2-Budget Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J1-MEL Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment J3-Past Performance.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment J7-Site Locations.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J6-List of Medicine Kits.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J9-GoodDistributionPractices.pdf | ||
| Attachment J5-Contractor Performance Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| USAID CHEGAR Sol_72065620R00008.pdf | ||
| Attachment J4-Work Plan Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USAID CHEGAR Incentive and Monitoring Framework
I. Performance Incentive Plan
Under USAID CHEGAR, offerors will provide a detailed cost and a minimum fee that does not exceed 2% of the target cost. Once awarded, the contractor will be reimbursed for all reasonable, allowable and allocable costs, in accordance with the Limitations of Funds Clause—FAR 52-232-22. An incentive payment, up to 8% of the target cost will be calculated based on the measure below and be paid on a quarterly basis.
USAID intends to provide performance incentives (PI) based on the performance against two key performance indicators. These performance incentive payments will be based on the value of deliveries that are approved for reimbursement on a semi-annual basis (for a total of 6 payments over the lifespan of the three-year contract). Contractors should propose a reasonable base fee not exceeding 2% in accordance with the quantity and risks. The maximum fee for this procurement will be 8% of the target cost. Indicators are defined so that they are within the manageable control of the contractor. The contractor is invited to suggest additional industry-specific indicators that will improve performance monitoring and maximizing efficiency. Performance will be tracked on a monthly basis; however, the incentive calculations will be made on a quarterly basis.
| Key Performance Metric |
| Target |
| Fee Structure |
| Fee Application |
On time delivery
This key performance metric measures the timeliness to which health facilities receive medical commodities in accordance with the pre-established distribution plan agreed with the contractor.
91-100%
81-90%
71-80% Tier 3 (91-100%): 4%
Tier 2 (81-90%): 3%
Tier 1 (71-80%): 1%
Applied to the expected target cost for the quarter
In full delivery
This key performance metric measures the completeness of deliveries in accordance with the pre-established distribution plan agreed with the contractor.
| 96-100% |
| Tier 3 (>96-100%): 4% |
Tier 2 (90-95%): 3%
Tier 1 (85-89%): 1%
Applied to the expected target cost for the quarter
II. Illustrative Performance Monitoring Plan
USAID intends to track performance on a monthly basis; however, the incentive calculations will be made on a quarterly basis.
| Key Performance Metric |
| Data Acquisition Plan |
| Data Quality Considerations |
| Data Analysis |
On time delivery
Data collection method: Submitted & approved in CHEGAR reporting to be reviewed by LMSC
Data Source: Agreed upon plan signed by DPS and signed proof of delivery (POD)
Frequency: Monthly Data Quality Assessment: DQA performed quarterly for a randomly selected province, and on an as needed basis when performance problems or complaints are raised
Potential Limitations: Districts may not have distribution plans Mitigation Plan: Make clear the distribution plan requirement before starting distributions in each geographic area.
Reported monthly with quarterly and semi-annual and annual review of trends by USAID IHO, LMSC, and CMAM serve as the basis for the semi-annual incentive payment
In full delivery
Data collection method: Submitted in CHEGAR reporting
Data Source: Delivery notes
Frequency: Monthly Data Quality Assessment: DQA performed quarterly for a randomly selected province, and on an as needed basis when performance problems or complaints are raised Potential Limitations: Delivery notes without signature and/or date Mitigation Plan: Training at the start of implementation on how to fill out delivery notes and conduct quality assurance during data review meetings Reported monthly with quarterly and semi-annual and annual review of trends by USAID IHO, LMSC, and CMAM serve as the basis for the quarterly incentive payment
Performance Monitoring Roles:
USAID Integrated Health Office (IHO), and third parties will monitor the performance of the CHEGAR contractor. A critical 3rd party monitor role will be the Last Mile Supply Chain (LMSC) project that will help monitor, track and validate the data reported for the incentive indicators. Other third parties include: host government officials at the national and sub-national level, health facilities and PEPFAR and other service delivery partners that support health facilities. Over the lifespan of the contract, CMAM and LMSC will play a prominent role in monitoring performance before the contract is due to end and responsibilities for last mile distribution should begin to transition to CMAM. The monitoring roles for the three main institutions validating CHEGARS performance, are detailed in the table below:
| Monitoring Activity |
| USAID IHO |
| LMSC |
| CMAM |
(starting in year 3)
| Desk review, progress versus agreed deliverables and milestones |
| Monthly |
| Monthly |
| Monthly |
| Central review performance data reported by CHEGAR contractor |
| Quarterly |
| Quarterly |
| Quarterly |
| Conduct site monitoring visits with data validation checks |
| Quarterly |
| Monthly |
| Ad hoc |
| Participate in in-person provincial level performance reviews with provinces/DPSs |
| Ad hoc |
| Quarterly |
| Ad hoc |
| Conduct data quality assessment |
| Ad hoc |
| Quarterly |
| Ad hoc |
| Review corrective action plans and completion of agreed actions |
| As needed |
| As needed |
| Ad hoc |
image1.png image2.svg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .