Attachment J.3 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 129 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Legal Advisory Services
- Solicitation number
- 9532426Q0024
- Issued by
-
Millennium Challenge Corporation
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for RFQ #95332426Q0024 for Legal Advisory Services. The document is designed to collect references from past clients or government representatives regarding an offeror's performance on previous contracts.
The questionnaire requests information about a specific reference contract, including the contract number, total contract value, period of performance, and whether the offeror served as prime or subcontractor. Evaluators must rate contractor performance across seven key assessment elements using a five-point scale: Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Unacceptable (U), and Not Applicable (NA). The assessment elements are: (1) Cost/Price Control—ability to manage costs and deliver at agreed-to prices; (2) Schedule Adherence—compliance with delivery schedules and timely submission of deliverables; (3) Performance—compliance with contract requirements and statement of work; (4) Quality—adherence to quality assurance and performance-based contracting requirements; (5) Business Relations—cooperative behavior, personnel stability, and responsiveness to changes; (6) Personnel Qualifications—ability to staff and retain qualified personnel; and (7) Overall Rating. The questionnaire also requires narrative responses identifying contractor strengths and weaknesses, and asks whether the reference would award to the contractor again. A certification section requires the reference to attest to the accuracy of ratings provided.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ # 95332426Q0024
UNCLASSIFIED
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation #: 95332426Q0024 | Legal Advisory Services Offeror Name:
Name of Reference:
Title/Role:
Email: Phone:
Agency/Company:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract #:
Total Contract Value ($):
Period of Performance:
Was the Offeror Prime or Sub?
Description of product/service provided:
RATING CATEGORIES:
RATING CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
Very Good VG Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds several requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Satisfactory S Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal M Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unacceptable U Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable NA Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.
UNCLASSIFIED
ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:
Using the rating categories on page 1, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.
(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).
VG S M U NA
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?
(3) Performance – Rate the contractor's ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.
(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?
(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems? Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.
UNCLASSIFIED
(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.
(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.
(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.
(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?
CERTIFICATION:
I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
[Enter Name of Reference] Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .