Attachment J-05 Past Performance Questionnaire_p.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted Oct 28, 2022

Attached to: TWEEDS Final RFP Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: 80GRC022R0013
Issued by: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to TWEEDS Final RFP, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
Attachment J-01 Statement of Work_p.pdf	PDF	Nov 4, 2022
TWEEDS Final RFP Q and A (3) 110422_p.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 4, 2022
80GRC022R0013 TWEEDS Final RFP Amendment 00002 (signed).pdf	PDF	Nov 4, 2022
TWEEDS Final RFP Q and A (2) 103122_p.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 31, 2022
80GRC022R0013 TWEEDS Final RFP Amendment 00001 (signed).pdf	PDF	Oct 28, 2022
TWEEDS Final RFP Q and A_p.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 28, 2022
Attachment J-01 Statement of Work_p.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2022
Attachment J-02 Data Requirements List.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2022
80GRC022R0013 TWEEDS Final RFP_p.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2022
SF33 TWEEDS RFP_p.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2022
Attachment J-03b Business Systems Reviews and Status Information_p.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 14, 2022
Request For Proposal (RFP) Cover Letter (signed).pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2022
Attachment J-04 Summary of Past Performance Worksheets 1 and 2_p.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 14, 2022
Attachment J-03a CAOT_p.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 14, 2022
Attachment J-03 Price Summary Template_p.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 14, 2022
Attachment J-06 IT Security Applicable Documents List_p.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2022

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

General Info

Attachment J-05
Past Performance Questionnaire - Due November 18, 2022 at 5:00 PM ET
Solicitation No: 80GRC022R0013 Technical Workforce Education and Expertise Development Services (TWEEDS)
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION				NOTE: BE SURE TO REVIEW ALL THREE TABS IN THE SPREADSHEET AND COMPLETE ALL THE REQUESTED INFORMATION!!
CONTRACTOR NAME:		CONTRACT NO:
CONTRACTOR ADDRESS:	Street	CONTRACT TYPE:	Indicate Below
	City	FIRM-FIXED-PRICE
	State	COST REIMBURSEMENT
	Zip	OTHER: (specify)
		ACTIVE or COMPLETED
		ROUTINE or COMPLEX
DATES OF PERFORMANCE:	From:	AWARD AMOUNT:
(*Current or Previous Contracts Only)	To:	TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE WITH MODS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Evaluator Name:
Position or Title:
Role in the Contract:
Length of time involved with Contract:
Email Address:
Phone Number:
Company Name:
Company Address
	Street
	City
	State
	Zip
Date of Questionnaire Completion
II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION
AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME: NASA Glenn Research Center
POC NAME/TITLE/EMAIL: Stephanie D'Anniballe / Contracting Officer
		stephanie.c.d'anniballe@nasa.gov

mailto:stephanie.c.d'anniballe@nasa.gov Definitions

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RATINGS & DEFINITIONS

Exceptional	Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good	Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory	Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal	Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory	Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A	Performance does not apply

Past Performance Evaluation NOTE: It is very important to keep in mind that only services currently being performed or completed during the past three years are considered relevant.

III. PAST PERFORMANCVE EVALUATION
Please rate the Contractor as described below in the following performance areas: technical, cost, management and schedule. Provide a short narrative to explain why you chose the adjective you did.
TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE		Rating	COMMENTS:
1	Offeror’s overall skill level and technical competence of personnel.
2	Offeror’s ability to identify and resolve problems (analysis of causes, impacts, and potential solutions).
3	Offeror’s ability to provide innovative approaches to challenges and/or utilize innovative technologies to support mission goals
4	Offeror’s ability to transition in response to changing organizational priorities
5	Offeror’s ability to deliver effective learning opportunities and knowledge sharing events
6	Offeror’s ability to support knowledge sharing and curriculum requirements
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE		Rating	COMMENTS:
1	Offeror’s overall accounting proficiency (invoices match work completion status).
2	Offeror’s ability to provide realistic cost estimates in a timely manner.
3	Offeror’s ability to maintain accurate data and produce accurate reports.
MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE		Rating	COMMENTS:
1	Offeror’s organization is structured to handle a highly fluctuating workload.
2	Offeror’s ability to select, manage and coordinate subcontracted efforts.
3	Offeror’s implementation of a successful phase-in activity.
4	Offeror’s quality control abilities (maintain schedules and time requirements, work quality, response to customer surveys, etc.).
5	Offeror’s effectiveness in communicating with all customers and stakeholders.
6	Offeror’s effectiveness in communicating with all customers and stakeholders.
7	Offeror’s ability to provide multiple options for consideration, including outcome and risk assessments, when making recommendations
8	Offeror’s ability to apply statistical methods and data analysis to inform recommendations
SCHEDULE		Rating	COMMENTS:
1	Offeror’s ability to plan and provide realistic schedule estimates.
2	Offeror’s ability to identify and resolve schedule problems.
3	Offeror’s ability to submit reports and deliverables on schedule.
OVERALL EVALUATION			COMMENTS:
1	Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
	If Yes, please explain the reason for the termination (e.g. inability to meet cost or delivery schedule, performance, etc…)
2	Are there any strong or weak points of contractor's performance you would like to share?
3	Would you select this contractor again?
	If no, please explain why.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Oct 28, 2022.