Attachment IV Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 155 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR NOAA MOC-P Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1305M223QNMAN0032
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for reference contract number evaluation related to solicitation number 1305M223QNMAN0032 for janitorial services for NOAA MOC-P. The questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for a bidder's previous contract and assessed the bidder's performance on quality of service, schedule, and management on a scale of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. The completed questionnaire must be returned to the NOAA contract specialist Bridget Cofo by March 2, 2023 at 2:00pm Eastern Time. The solicitation is for the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and seeks janitorial services for an unspecified location.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment I- Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| Attachment V MOC-P LEED Green Cleaning Policy .pdf | ||
| Attachment VI- Register of Wage Determinations.pdf | ||
| RFQ 1305M223QNMAN0032.pdf | ||
| Attachment II- Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment III Past Performance Information Form.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 1305M223QNMAN0032 Attachment: IV
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________
(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Bridget Cofo no later than March 2, 2023 at 2:00 pm Eastern Time:
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction. (Check the appropriate rating box.)
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________
Rater’s Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Bridget Cofo at e-mail Bridget.Cofo@noaa.gov, no later than March 2, 2023 2:00 pm Eastern Time:
mailto:Tamara.Horton@noaa.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .