Attachment I_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 41 KB Posted

Attached to
CTP Public Education Campaign Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
RFP_FDA-SOL-1230974
Issued by
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Acquisition and Grant Services

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a solicitation for a CTP Public Education Campaign. The past performance questionnaire requests ratings and commentary on a contractor's business relations, quality of service, cost control, timeliness of performance, and customer satisfaction on a previous contract. It will be used to evaluate contractors for award of an IDIQ contract with a five-year period to provide technical services supporting public education campaigns for the FDA Center for Tobacco Products. The solicitation seeks planning, development, production, and delivery of multichannel messaging, strategies, and materials for multiple paid media public health campaigns targeting national and niche audiences. Services will include formative research and applying audience targeting factors to reach groups as small as 400,000 people to as large as 25 million people. The response deadline for the past performance questionnaire is not provided. The issuing agency is the FDA within the Department of Health and Human Services.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CTP Public Education Campaign, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amend2_Attachment G_Question Submittal Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amend1_RFP_FDA-SOL-1230974.pdf PDF
Attachment J_HHS Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template.doc DOC document
Attachment C_ Wage Determinations.pdf PDF
Attachment F_Labor Category Descriptions.docx DOCX document
RFP_FDA-SOL-1230974.docx DOCX document
Attachment G_Question Submittal Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment D_IDIQ Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment B_FAR Deviation 18-01 (Whistleblower Protection-Commercial).pdf PDF
Attachment A_Campaign Backgrounds 10.6.20.pdf PDF
Attachment E_Standard Form LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.pdf PDF
Attachment H_Relevant Experience Form.docx DOCX document
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment I Solicitation No. FDA-RFP-TBD CTP Public Education Campaign

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete the following questionnaire and return via email: Please reference “Past Performance Questionnaire, CTP Public Education Campaign, Solicitation No. FDA-RFP-TBD” in the subject line. Send to, TBD, Contract Specialist, at TBD@fda.hhs.gov and CC: Contracting Officer, Gary Klaff, gary.klaff@fda.hhs.gov no later than TBD, 2020, 3:00 PM, Eastern Time.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration intends to award an indefinite-delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract with a five-year ordering period, to obtain services related to public education campaigns. The purpose of this IDIQ contract is to provide the FDA Center for Tobacco Products with a mechanism to obtain technical services supporting a full range of communications activities. Such activities include planning, developing, producing, and delivering consumer-based messaging, strategies, and materials for multiple multichannel public health education campaigns targeting both national and niche audiences using unique combinations of geographic, demographic, psychographic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. The Contractor shall provide comprehensive campaign services for multiple public education campaigns targeting audiences as small as 400,000 people to as large as 25 million people, to include, but not limited to, financing and placing annual media buys in excess of $100 million.

Your agency/business has been selected as a past performance reference. Please take a moment to complete this past performance questionnaire using the ratings described below to answer each question. You may provide additional information and comments as necessary. Please provide a justification for the ratings provided.

This survey pertains to Contractor: ________________________

Department/Component:

Contract Number: Date of Survey: ________________

Name of Person Completing Survey: ______________________________________

Your Company/Agency: ________________________________________________

Your Role in this Contract (circle one):

Contracting Officer Contract Specialist Project Officer Other

Contract Value (including options): $_________________________________

Performance Period: _____________________________________________ (Including option periods)

Type of Contract: (circle all that apply) Fixed-price Time-and-Material Labor-hour Cost-reimbursement Other:

Approximate percentage of work being performed (or completed) by subcontractor(s): %

Information on subcontractor(s) (where more than 51% of work was completed by the subcontractor):

________________
SubcontractorProgram ManagerPhone

________________ Subcontractor Program Manager Phone

________________ Subcontractor Program Manager Phone

General description of products/services required under the contract:

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support rating shall be noted on page 4.

Assign each area a rating of, 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good),or 4 (Excellent). Use the Rating Guidelines (see end of document) as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle "N/A" (not applicable/no opinion).

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Contractor provides knowledgeable, experienced, trained and qualified personnel.

1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Effective management, including management of subcontracts 1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Reasonable/cooperative behavior 1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Responsive to contract requirements 1 2 3 4 N/A

5. Notification of problems 1 2 3 4 N/A

6. Flexibility 1 2 3 4 N/A

7. Pro-active vs. reactive 1 2 3 4 N/A

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Compliance with contract requirements 1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Contractor is responsive to technical direction.

1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Accuracy of reports 1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Effectiveness of personnel 1 2 3 4 N/A

5. Technical Excellence 1 2 3 4 N/A

COST CONTROL

1. Record of forecasting and controlling target costs 1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Current, accurate and complete billings 1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals 1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Cost efficiencies 1 2 3 4 N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

1. Met interim milestones 1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Reliability 1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Responsive to technical direction 1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration 1 2 3 4 N/A

5. Contractor met contract delivery schedules/deadlines 1 2 3 4 N/A

6. Contractor provided sufficient notification of contract problems to appropriate government personnel.

1 2 3 4 N/A

7. Contractor is pro-active and is reasonable/cooperative 1 2 3 4 N/A

8. Liquidated damages assessed: Yes No (circle one)

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction. Yes No (circle one)

2. Would you recommend this contractor for award (Yes or No)? Yes No (circle one)

Please explain.

3. Are you satisfied with the service you received and would you hire the contractor again (Yes or No)? If not, why not? Please be specific.

4. Do you feel the quality of the services received was worth the cost/price? Please circle one of the statements below.

A). Extremely well worth the cost.

B). Well worth the cost.

C). Worth the cost.

D). Cost was more than the value received.

E). Cost was greatly in excess of value received.

F). Government derived no value from cost spent.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

RATING GUIDELINES

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

COST CONTROL

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1-Poor

Major problems have been encountered

Contractor is having major difficulty managing costs effectively

Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule

Response to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues is marginally effective

2-Fair

Some problems have been encountered

Contractor is having some problems managing costs effectively

Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule

Response to inquiries, technical/ administrative issues is somewhat effective

3-Good

Minor inefficiencies/ errors have been identified

Contractor is usually effective in managing costs

Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule

Response to inquiries, technical/ administrative issues is usually effective

4-Excellent

Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services

Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete billings

Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule

Response to inquiries, technical/ administrative issues is effective

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .