Attachment G PPQ.pdf

PDF 734 KB Posted

Attached to
Contract Audit Support Services (CASS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80NSSC21R0018
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Shared Services Center

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for contract audit support services. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Shared Services Center seeks to award multiple contracts for audit services including reviewing contractor accounting systems, internal controls, incurred costs, and compliance with cost accounting standards. This is a total small business set-aside with a North American Industry Classification System code of 541211 and size standard of $22 million. The period of performance and pricing terms are not specified. Offers are due by June 9, 2021 and awards will be made to responsible offerors whose proposals conform to the solicitation and are most advantageous as determined by the factors of technical approach, past performance, and price/cost.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Contract Audit Support Services (CASS), newest first.
File Type Posted
80NSSC21R0018 SF30 (00002).pdf PDF
80NSSC21R0018 Q-A (00002).pdf PDF
80NSSC21R0018 Q-A.pdf PDF
80NSSC21R0018 RFP (00001).pdf PDF
Attachment E Evaluation Factors for Award (00001).pdf PDF
80NSSC21R0018 SF30 (00001).pdf PDF
Attachment D Instructions to Offerors (00001).pdf PDF
Attachment A PWS (00001).pdf PDF
Attachment D Instructions to Offerors.pdf PDF
Attachment B DRD.pdf PDF
Attachment A PWS.pdf PDF
80NSSC21R0018 RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment C WD.pdf PDF
Attachment E Evaluation Factors for Award.pdf PDF
Attachment F CASS Technical Verification Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT G: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRRE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION Respondent to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Respondent Information Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

6. Describe the respondent’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Respondent’s Signature:

NOTE: The Offeror may provide the Past Performance Questionnaire for each contract reference included in their submission of Volume II Past Performance. The Past Performance Questionnaire will be used to solicit assessments of the Offeror’s performance from previous or current customers. The Offeror may instruct each of its references to return the questionnaire directly to the Contracting Officer via e-mail to nicolas.a.zogaib@nasa.gov as stated on the questionnaire. The Offeror shall include in its written proposal a list of those to whom the questionnaires were sent, including name of individual, current and verified phone number, organization, e-mail address, and contract number. The Past Performance Questionnaire is due to the Contracting Officer no later than the time and date specified in Attachment C Instructions to Offerors under Table 9-2, Proposal Due Date and Time.

Check CPARS definitions to ensure latest 42.1215

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .