Attachment E - PESF - RFQ-2026-002-OA.pdf

PDF 683 KB Posted

Attached to
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING SERVICES State and local contract opportunity
Solicitation number
RFP-14630
Issued by
Broward County, Fruitville CDP, Florida

About this file

This is a Performance Evaluation Survey Form (Attachment E) for Request for Quotation RFQ-2026-002-OA issued by Broward College in Florida for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineering Services. The form is designed to be completed by organizations that have previously worked with prospective respondents to this RFQ, serving as a reference evaluation tool. References must be submitted in PDF format to Orlando Aponte at oaponte@broward.edu by 2:30 p.m. ET on Wednesday, March 18, 2026. The contract seeks to provide full professional services for MEP engineering on an as-needed continuing contract basis across Broward College's campuses, centers, and facilities, with individual scopes of work to be identified per project and assigned by the College.

The Performance Evaluation Survey Form uses a 0-5 rating scale to assess prospective contractors across ten evaluation criteria: quality of service/project/product, personnel performance and workmanship, timeliness and responsiveness, overall performance, customer service, ability to meet deadlines/milestones/budget, technical expertise and equipment capability, yearly contract management (if applicable), staff interaction, and likelihood of future engagement. Respondents are required to provide detailed information about the reference company, dates of service, and dollar amounts of previous contracts, along with written comments. The form emphasizes the College's focus on selecting contractors with demonstrated experience meeting specifications, managing budgets and schedules, and delivering services that occasionally or consistently exceed expectations.

View the file

Other files for this state and local contract opportunity

Other files attached to MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING ENGINEERING SERVICES, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFQ-2026-002-OA - MFMP Solicitation Document.pdf PDF
Attachment F - FFPA - RFQ-2026-002-OA.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFQ-2026-002-OA – MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING

ENGINEERING SERVICES

ATTACHMENT E - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY FORM

Please email this form to Orlando Aponte at oaponte@broward.edu once completed in PDF format prior to 2:30 p.m. ET on Wednesday, March 18, 2026

This form is to be completed by the organization providing the reference only.

Name of Company (Respondent to this RFQ) on which reference is being provided:

Company providing reference:

Address of company providing reference:

Name/title of person providing reference:

Phone number of person providing reference:

Email address of person providing reference:

Date(s) of Service:

Annual Aggregate Dollar Amount and/or Dollar Amount of Service

Please evaluate and rate the performance of the company noted above (the Proposer to this RFQ), using the following ratings scale:

0 = Do Not Hire (our company would not hire them again) 1 = Poor (does not meet minimum standards) 2 = Fair (barely meets minimum standards) 3 = Average (meets minimum standards) 4 = Good (meets defined minimum requirements and occasionally exceeds your expectations) 5 = Excellent or Outstanding (always exceed your expectations)

Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE/PROJECT/PRODUCT: Did they perform service and provide project/product as specified and/or as proposed? Please rate.

2. PERSONNEL: Regarding the performance and workmanship of company personnel. Please rate.

3. TIMELINESS/RESPONSIVENESS: Was the company’s timeliness and responsiveness satisfactory to your entity’s needs? Please rate.

4. OVERALL PERFORMANCE: Was company willing to and/or did they go above and beyond project requirements, i.e., within reason, without altering specification? Please rate.

5. CUSTOMER SERVICE: If problems were caused or encountered, were they addressed and resolved promptly? Please rate customer service.

6. DEADLINES/MILESTONES/BUDGET: Was the company able to meet service delivery schedule and/or perform service to meet established deadlines/milestones/budget? Please rate.

7. ABILITY TO PERFORM: Did the company have technical expertise, facilities, and equipment to perform as specified? Please rate.

8. YEARLY CONTRACTS: If performing a yearly term contract, was the company able to adequately manage for the duration? Please rate yearly contract performance.

9. INTERACTION: Did their company representative work well with your entity’s staff in providing these services or in performing yearly continuing contract? Please rate.

10. FUTURE PROJECTS: Most importantly, would you use this firm again? Yes? No?

Comments?

COMMENTS: Are there any additional comments you would like to add?

mailto:oaponte@broward.edu

Name of Company Proposer to this RFP on which reference is being provided:
Company providing reference:
Address of company providing reference:
Name of person providing reference:
Phone number of person providing reference:
Email address of person providing reference:
Dates of Service:
Annual Aggregate Dollar Amount andor Dollar Amount of Service:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column1 QUALITY OF SERVICEPROJECTPRODUCT Did they perform service and provide projectproduct as specified andor as proposed Please rate:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column2 PERSONNEL Regarding the performance and workmanship of company personnel Please rate:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column3 TIMELINESSRESPONSIVENESS Was the companys timeliness and responsiveness satisfactory to your entitys needs Please rate:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column4 OVERALL PERFORMANCE Was company willing to andor did they go above and beyond project requirements ie within reason without altering specification Please rate:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column5 CUSTOMER SERVICE If problems were caused or encountered were they addressed and resolved promptly Please rate customer service:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column6 DEADLINESMILESTONESBUDGET Was the company able to meet service delivery schedule andor perform service to meet established deadlinesmilestonesbudget Please rate:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column7 ABILITY TO PERFORM Did the company have technical expertise facilities and equipment to perform as specified Please rate:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column8 YEARLY CONTRACTS If performing a yearly term contract was the company able to adequately manage for the duration Please rate yearly contract performance:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column9 INTERACTION Did their company representative work well with your entitys staff in providing these services or in performing yearly continuing contract Please rate:
Insert YOUR RATINGS in this column10 FUTURE PROJECTS Most importantly would you use this firm again Yes No Comments:
COMMENTS Are there any additional comments you would like to add 1:
COMMENTS Are there any additional comments you would like to add 2:
COMMENTS Are there any additional comments you would like to add 3:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .