Attachment E - Past Performace Questionaires.pdf

March 2016 Version

Federal Protective Service

Western Consolidated Contracting Group

400 15 th

St. SW

Auburn, WA 98001

ATTACHMENT E

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE:

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal

Protective Service is considering this Contractor for the installation of a Video Surveillance System (VSS) in Las

Vegas, NV. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten or typed responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire.

More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, PLEASE EMAIL to Dolor E. Alegrado at Dolor.E.Alegrado@fps.dhs.gov f you have any questions, please submit in writing to this email address. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE (TO DATE):

NAME:

TITLE:

COMPANY:

TELEPHONE:

EMAIL:

mailto:Dolor.E.Alegrado@fps.dhs.gov

3. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control over the entirety of the installation. How effective was the

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS:

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we may determine any similarities to this contract:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of professionalism and attentiveness.

Comments:

2. Discuss the Contractor’s overall level of customer service and responsiveness.

Comments:

3. Contractor in identifying and resolving problems—was the Contractor proactive or reactionary?

Comments:

4. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to provide sufficient supervision/staffing to ensure effective and successful performance.

Comments:

5. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to them by owner and tenant representatives?

6. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project.

Comments:

7. Please describe any special, unique and/or complex requirements of the project, and how well the

Contractor was able to handle those complex requirements.

Comments:

8. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

9. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.

b. Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.

c. Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.