Attachment_E_Cost_Proposal.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Business Process Mapping Services
- Solicitation number
- HRD126-HR-6463
- Issued by
- San Bernardino County, California
About this file
This is a cost proposal attachment for business process mapping services being procured by San Bernardino County, California. The proposal template requires vendors to provide detailed cost estimates across six primary service areas: review and validation of the County's Enterprise Value Chain and Oracle Fusion alignment (Level 0-1), sub-process development including ownership models and governance (Level 2), detailed swim-lane process flow development with methodology coaching (Level 3), methodology guidance and templates for task-level work instructions (Level 4), current-state documentation review and gap analysis (Current-State Documentation), and development of a comprehensive process governance framework. The project is structured in four sequential phases—Mobilization, Discovery, Development, and Closeout/Transition—with specific deliverables and acceptance criteria required for payment progression.
Proposers must submit pricing on an hourly rate basis with lump-sum pricing explicitly prohibited. The cost proposal consists of three reconciling sections: cost breakdown by process architecture level, cost breakdown by resource and rate (with separate hour allocations for mobilization, discovery, development, and closeout phases), and cost breakdown by project phase with corresponding payment milestones. Travel costs are subject to a not-to-exceed cap and must comply with GSA Federal per diem rates applicable to San Bernardino County, including economy-class airfare only, lodging, meals and incidentals, and ground transportation. All three cost sections must balance to a single grand total, and payments must be tied to deliverable acceptance milestones rather than calendar dates, with vendors required to specify the percentage of total contract value associated with each phase.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP 6463 - Amendment 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP 6463 - Business_Process_Mapping.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
A - Process Architecture Level
| ATTACHMENT E — COST PROPOSAL | |||||
| Section A: Cost Breakdown by Process Architecture Level | |||||
| Proposer Name: ________________________________________ | |||||
| Instructions: Enter estimated effort and cost for each process architecture level. Blue text on yellow cells indicates Proposer input fields. Lump-sum pricing will not be accepted. | |||||
| # | Process Architecture Level | Scope Description | Estimated Hours | Hourly Rate ($) | Total Cost ($) |
| 1 | Level 0–1 Review and Validation | Review and validate County-developed Enterprise Value Chain and End-to-End Process architecture for completeness, accuracy, and Oracle Fusion alignment | $0 | ||
| 2 | Level 2 Sub-Process Development | Lead and own development of Sub-Process decomposition including ownership models, variation frameworks, cross-departmental handoff design, and governance points | $0 | ||
| 3 | Level 3 Detailed Process Flow Development | Lead and own development of detailed swim-lane process flows including roles, decision points, system touchpoints, exception paths, and compliance controls; provide methodology coaching to County staff | $0 | ||
| 4 | Level 4 Methodology and Guidance | Provide methodology guidance, templates, and quality acceptance criteria for County-produced task-level work instructions | $0 | ||
| 5 | Current-State Documentation Review | Review and validate existing County As-Is process documentation for completeness; conduct gap analysis to inform To-Be design | $0 | ||
| 6 | Process Governance Framework | Develop process ownership model, variation approval authority, cross-departmental decision-making protocols, escalation pathways, and post-go-live lifecycle model | $0 | ||
| SUBTOTAL — PROFESSIONAL SERVICES | 0 | $0 | |||
| Travel Costs (Not-to-Exceed) | |||||
| GRAND TOTAL | $0 |
B - Resource and Rate
| ATTACHMENT E — COST PROPOSAL | ||||||||||
| Section B: Cost Breakdown by Resource and Rate | ||||||||||
| Proposer Name: ________________________________________ | ||||||||||
| Instructions: Identify each proposed resource by role. Add rows as needed. Blue text on yellow cells indicates Proposer input fields. | ||||||||||
| # | Resource Role/Title | Hourly Rate ($) | Mobilize | |||||||
| Hours | Discovery | |||||||||
| Hours | Development | |||||||||
| Hours | Closeout | |||||||||
| Hours | Total Hours | Total Cost ($) | ||||||||
| 1 | 0 | $0 | ||||||||
| 2 | 0 | $0 | ||||||||
| 3 | 0 | $0 | ||||||||
| 4 | 0 | $0 | ||||||||
| 5 | 0 | $0 | ||||||||
| 6 | 0 | $0 | ||||||||
| SUBTOTAL — PROFESSIONAL SERVICES | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | ||||
| TRAVEL COST DETAIL | ||||||||||
| Item | Detail | Not-to-Exceed ($) | ||||||||
| Estimated Number of Trips | ||||||||||
| Estimated Cost Per Trip | ||||||||||
| Airfare (economy class only) | ||||||||||
| Lodging Per Diem Rate | Per GSA Federal rates for San Bernardino County | |||||||||
| Meals & Incidentals Per Diem | Per GSA Federal rates for San Bernardino County | |||||||||
| Ground Transportation | ||||||||||
| TRAVEL NOT-TO-EXCEED TOTAL | $0 | |||||||||
| GRAND TOTAL (Services + Travel) | $0 |
C - Project Phase
| ATTACHMENT E — COST PROPOSAL | |||
| Section C: Cost Breakdown by Project Phase | |||
| Proposer Name: ________________________________________ | |||
| Instructions: Map costs to each project phase. Identify the deliverable acceptance criteria that trigger each payment. Costs shall be tied to milestones, not calendar dates. | |||
| Phase | Key Deliverables | Deliverable Acceptance Criteria | Estimated |
Duration
| (Weeks) | Estimated |
| Hours | Phase |
| Cost ($) | Payment |
(% of Total)
| Mobilization | Project plan, methodology playbook, process inventory, current-state review | |||||
| Discovery | Level 0–1 review and validation, Level 2 sub-process architecture, governance framework, variation framework | |||||
| Development | Level 3 detailed process flows, Level 4 methodology and templates, independent QA reviews | |||||
| Closeout / Transition | Final deliverable package, knowledge transfer completion, transition plan acceptance | |||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | $0 | 0% | ||
| PROPOSED PAYMENT SCHEDULE | ||||||
| Payment # | Milestone / Trigger | Deliverable(s) Required for Acceptance | Amount ($) | % of Total | ||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| TOTAL | $0 | 0% |
Legend
| ATTACHMENT E — LEGEND | ||
| How to Complete This Attachment | ||
| Blue text on yellow cells | Proposer input — enter your values here | |
| White cells with formulas | Auto-calculated — do not overwrite | |
| Green cells | Subtotal / Total rows — auto-calculated | |
| Sections: | ||
| Tab A | Cost by Process Architecture Level (Levels 0–4, Current-State Review, Governance) | |
| Tab B | Cost by Resource and Rate (staffing, rates, hours per phase, travel detail) | |
| Tab C | Cost by Project Phase (Mobilization, Discovery, Development, Closeout) with payment schedule | |
| Notes: | ||
| • | Lump-sum pricing will not be accepted. All three sections must be completed. | |
| • | Grand Total on all three tabs must reconcile. | |
| • | Costs shall be tied to deliverable acceptance milestones, not calendar dates. | |
| • | Travel costs shall not exceed the amount stated in Tab B. GSA Federal per diem rates apply. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .