Attachment D_Reference Checks.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-66000-00015434
- Issued by
- Oregon
About this file
This is a Reference Check Form attachment for a Request for Proposals issued by the State of Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) for Wetlands Technical Assistance Services, OregonBuys Bid # S-66000-00015434. The form is designed to gather information from client references regarding a proposer's previous performance on similar projects completed within the last five years. Proposers are required to provide at least three references from current or former client firms that can verify the quality of work related to wetlands-related services. The form requests references to provide detailed responses regarding the type of services engaged, quality of customer service, overall satisfaction with the business relationship, problem resolution methods, likelihood of future engagement, satisfaction with specific service aspects, adherence to proposed timelines, and cost performance relative to initial proposals.
The Reference Check Form serves as an evaluation tool for the Agency to assess proposer qualifications and verify compliance with solicitation requirements. The Agency reserves the right to contact submitted references or pursue additional references not provided by the proposer to obtain verification information, break tie scores among competing proposals, or clarify any information necessary for evaluation purposes. This structured reference verification process supports the Agency's assessment of each proposer's demonstrated ability to deliver wetlands technical assistance services effectively to local jurisdictions seeking to increase their capacity for grant or procurement administration.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment A_Sample_Price_Agreement_for_Services_DOJ_Approved.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment G_Responsibility Inquiry.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment F_Cert Disadvantaged Outreach.docx | DOCX document | |
| S-66000-00015434_Evaluation_Summary.pdf | ||
| Intent to Award Notice~4.pdf | ||
| Attachment E_Price Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Wetlands_Technical_Assistance_Services_RFP_DOJ_approved~1.pdf | ||
| Attachment B_Disclosure Exemption.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment C_Proposer Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| Wetlands Technical Assistance Services Pre-Proposal Conference-20251203_090513-Meeting Recording.mp4 | MP4 file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
OregonBuys Bid # S-66000-00015434 | Wetlands Technical Assistance Services Attachment D
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
[Delete instructions in brackets: Provide at least 3 references from current or former client firms for similar projects performed for any clients within the last 5 years. References must verify the quality of previous, related Work.
Agency may check to determine if references provided support Proposer’s ability to comply with the requirements of this solicitation. Agency may use references to obtain additional information, break tie scores, or verify any information needed. Agency may contact any reference (submitted or not) to verify Proposer’s qualifications.]
| Proposer Name: | __________________________________________ |
| Reference Entity: | __________________________________________ |
| Reference Contact Name: | __________________________________________ |
| Contact Telephone Number: | __________________________________________ |
| Contact Email Address: | __________________________________________ |
Please respond to the following questions:
1. For what type of services did you engage Proposer?
Describe the services listed in response to question 1.
Describe Proposer’s customer service.
Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Proposer.
Describe Proposer’s methods for problem resolution.
How likely would you be to use Proposer’s services again?
With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s services are you the most satisfied?
With which aspect(s) of Proposer’s services are you the least satisfied?
How well did Proposer stay within the proposed timeline?
How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?
| Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 | Page 1 of 2 |
| DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016 | Page 2 of 2 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .