Attachment D - Reference Check Form~9.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-69000-00011367
- Issued by
- Multnomah County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form for the RFP - S-69000-00011367 - Lower Umatilla Basin Groundwater Management Area Project. It is a form to be completed by the offeror, providing contact information for a reference entity and instructions for the reference to rate the offeror's overall quality of services, delivery of service, and responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests on a scale of 0-10. The form does not provide any additional details about the project scope, timeline, or contract terms.
The document does not contain information about the products or services requested, project overview, item quantities, response dates, due dates, site visits, bidder's meetings and conferences, award dates, contract term and renewal options, pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements and sources, or any other salient information about the contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Notice of Intent to Award Mikes Fence Co.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment C - Proposer Information and Certification Sheet~10.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP S-69000-00011367~1.pdf | ||
| Attachment F - COBID Certification_Outreach Plan~9.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B - Disclosure Exemption Affidavit~12.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A - Sample Services Contract~9.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment G - Responsibility Inquiry~9.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP – S-69000-00011367 – Lower Umatilla Basin Groundwater Management Area Project Attachment D
ATTACHMENT D — REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Offeror Name:
Reference Entity:
Reference Contact Name:
Contact Telephone Number:
Contact Email Address:
Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied
1. How would you rate the Offeror’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Offeror?
Score:
Comments
2. How would you rate the Offeror’s delivery of service?
Score:
Comments
3. How would you rate the Offeror’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score:
Comments
DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – August 16, 2021 Page 1 of 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .