Attachment D-Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- OMAO/Occupational Health Support Services
- Solicitation number
- 1305M224Q0073
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to Solicitation 1305M224Q0073 for OMAO/Occupational Health Support Services. The Questionnaire assesses the contractor's past performance in four key areas: quality of service, schedule, cost control, and management. Raters are asked to provide an adjectival rating (exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory) and comments for each area.
The completed questionnaire is to be submitted to Amy McLiverty at amy.l.mcliverty@noaa.gov by May 10, 2024, 12:00 PM EST. This Questionnaire is part of the source selection information for the solicitation, which is being issued by the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for OMAO/Occupational Health Support Services. No other details about the solicitation requirements or scope of work are provided in this document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment B-Schedule of Items and Prices_Amend0005.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment A-SOW_Amend0005.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4-QASP.pdf | ||
| SOW_Attachment 4-Audiology Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0005.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers_Amend0005.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SOW_Attachment 5 Respirator Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0004.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment C- Past Performance Information Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment A-Statement of Work-Occupational Health Services.pdf | ||
| Sol_1305M224Q0073.pdf | ||
| Attachment B-Schedule of Items and Prices.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT D:
PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION 1305M224Q0073
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR BEING REVIEWED:
PERSON COMPLETING
QUESTIONNAIRE:
REFERENCE CONTRACT #:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION:
Send Completed Questionnaire to Amy McLiverty at amy.l.mcliverty@noaa.gov no later than May 10, 2024, 12:00 PM EST.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
mailto:amy.l.mcliverty@noaa.gov
Source Selection Information
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________
Rater’s Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .