Attachment D - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24424Q0823
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity, Solicitation Number 36C24424Q0823 for Coatesville VA ALS/BLS/WC Transportation Service. The questionnaire is to be completed by an evaluator and covers the contractor's past and present performance in areas such as quality of services, timeliness, and business relations. The evaluator must provide narrative comments and adjectival ratings for each performance element, as well as an overall past/present performance rating. The solicitation is a small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 621910 and a closing date of October 22, 2024. The contract will be a five-year indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) awarded to a single firm-fixed price contractor.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24424Q0823_3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D - Past Performance Questionnaire_updated.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24424Q0823_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24424Q0823_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24424Q0823 - Coatesville VAMC WC_ALS_BLS Ambulance Trans Service.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B - QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24424Q0823.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment E - WD 2015-5791_Rev 26_Date 07-22-2024_ Bucks_Chester_Montgomery Counties.pdf | ||
| Attachment E - WD 2015-4233_Rev 30_Date 07-22-2024_ Delaware_Philadelphia Counties.pdf | ||
| Attachment C - Price Schedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A - PWS Ambulance_WC Van.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment D
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C24424Q0823
Coatesville VAMC, Coatesville, PA
THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EVALUATOR. PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO CYNTHIA LAEMMERHIRT, CYNTHIA.LAEMMERHIRT@VA.GOV. SOLICITATION CLOSE DATE IS OCT 22, 2024 AT 11:00AM.:
I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
Negotiated price or cost at award:
Current estimated contract dollar amount:
Describe service acquired:
II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Name:
Organization:
Phone Number:
(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, other, etc.)
Time on Contract:
III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under Paragraphs III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance adjectival rating under par. III.F based on the Adjectival Rating Descriptions below. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.
PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.
| EXCELLENT |
| GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
Performance meets contractual requirements with most exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
A. QUALITY OF SERVICES
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), necessary equipment which is properly maintained, quality control for performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.
2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory
| B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: | ||
| 1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’s | specific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing any | administrative reports/documents required by your contract. |
2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
C. BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous and responsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff?
2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
D. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:
E. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?
YES |_| NO |_|
If no, please explain:
F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
Additional Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Name/Signature Date
Title
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .