ATTACHMENT D - Past Performance Questionaire - Unarmed Uniformed Security Services - Jacksonville National Cemetery.pdf

PDF 126 KB Posted

Attached to
R430--Jacksonville NC | Unarmed/Uniformed Security Patrol Services | April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022 w/(4) 1-Year Options through March 31, 2026
Solicitation number
36C78621Q0116
Issued by

About this file

This document is a combined synopsis and solicitation for unarmed uniformed security services at the Jacksonville National Cemetery. The solicitation seeks quotations for security and patrol services from April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022 with four one-year option periods through March 31, 2026. The solicitation is issued as a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. Quotations are due by March 19, 2021. The Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration will evaluate quotations based on price, past performance, socio-economic status, and quality control plan to select the vendor providing the best value. Required services include security and patrols in accordance with the attached statement of work.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT D: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO.: 36C78621Q0116 for Unarmed/Uniformed Security and Patrol Services for the Jacksonville National Cemetery.

NOTE TO EVALUATORS: Upon completion, please email this confidential Questionnaire directly to Ms. Tené Becknell, Contracting Officer, National Cemetery Administration ONLY at tene.becknell@va.gov.

**Please be sure to reference the above-mentioned Solicitation Number and Title in the Subject line of your email when submitting.

Thank you for your time and input.

DATE OF EVALUATION: _____________

NAME OF COMPANY YOU ARE PROVIDING THIS PAST PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION FOR: ________________________________

YOUR NAME: __________________________________

YOUR COMPANY OR AGENCY NAME: _____________________________________

TYPE OF SERVICES PROVIDED: ___________________________________________

CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________________________________

CONTRACT PERIOD OR LENGTH OF TIME SERVICES PERFORMED: _______________

CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT: ____________________________________

For the following questions, please circle the number on the scale from 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance on the contract referenced above.

Please provide a written explanation below for scores of 1 or 5.

1 - unacceptable performance

2 - marginally acceptable

3 - fully acceptable or Good

4 - Very Good, with very few incidents

5 - Superior performance.

mailto:tene.becknell@va.gov

1.) On a scale of 1 to 5, score the company’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions and the technical requirements of the contract (please provide a written explanation below for scores of 1 or 5):

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Comments:

2.) On a scale of 1 to 5, score how well the company demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior in resolving customer requests and or complaints (please provide a written explanation below for scores of 1 or 5):

3.) On a scale of 1 to 5, rate how flexible the Contractor was in satisfying the requirements of the customer (please provide a written explanation below for scores of 1 or 5):

4.) On a scale of 1 to 5, score how well this company met response times in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract (please provide a written explanation below for scores of 1 or 5):

5.) On a scale of 1 to 5, score how the company performed with the proper and timely submission of invoice as well as accuracy of those invoice in reflecting correct charges (please provide a written explanation below for scores of 1 or 5).

6.) Rate the company’s overall performance (please provide a written explanation below for scores of 1 or 5):

7.) Would you award a contract to this company again?

Yes:

No:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .