ATTACHMENT D.pdf
PDF 564 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-P00100-00009535
- Issued by
- Lane County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Attachment D - Responsibility Inquiry for a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by Lane Community College in Oregon for Titan Bookstore Operation Management services. Lane Community College is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to provide bookstore services, including furnishing services, equipment, goods, and supplies necessary to manage and operate a professional bookstore to serve students and the community. The RFP covers a contract period with potential renewal options, but does not specify the exact term length. The Responsibility Inquiry form requires the proposer to provide information about their financial, material, equipment, facility, and personnel resources and expertise, as well as their performance on past contracts, any legal or criminal issues, and financial standing. The proposer must certify the accuracy of the information provided.
The RFP is for a state and local contract opportunity in Oregon, specifically within Lane County and the City of Eugene. The total contract value is not specified. Pricing terms, funding sources, and any set-aside requirements are not detailed in this document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| C2019272_OBDF Loan Referral RFP_Addendum 1.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT F.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT A.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT G.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT C.pdf | ||
| Titan Book Store -RFP-23-24-06.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT E (1).pdf | ||
| Center building floor 1.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT B.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TITAN COURT BOOKSTORE MANAGEMENT ATT D
ATTACHMENT D
RESPONSIBILITY INQUIRY
The College will determine responsibility of a Proposer prior to award and execution of a Contract Agreement. In addition to this form, the College may notify the Proposer of other documentation required, which may include but is not limited to recent profit-and-loss history, current balance statements and cash flow information, assets-to-liabilities ratio, including number and amount of secured versus unsecured creditor claims, availability of short and long-term financing, bonding capacity, insurability, credit information, materials and equipment, facility capabilities, personnel information, record of performance under previous contracts, etc. Failure to promptly provide requested information or clearly demonstrate responsibility may result in an College finding of non-responsibility and rejection.
1. Does the Proposer have available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of the Proposer to meet all contractual responsibilities? YES / NO .
2. Within the last five years, how many contracts of a similar nature has the Proposer completed that, to the extent that the costs associated with and time available to perform the contract remained within Proposer′s control, Proposer stayed within the time and budget allotted, and there were no contract claims by any party? Number: ____
How many contracts did not meet those standards? Number: ____ If any, please explain.
Response:
3. Within the last three years has the Proposer (incl. a partner or shareholder owning 10% or more of Proposer’s firm) or a major subcontractor (receiving 10% or more of a total contract amount) been criminally or civilly charged, indicted or convicted in connection with:
• obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract,
• violation of federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of bids or Proposals, or
• embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property? YES / NO .
If "YES," indicate the jurisdiction, date of indictment, charge or judgment, and names and summary of charges in the response field below.
Response:
4. Within the last three years, has the Proposer had:
• any contracts terminated for default by any government agency, or• any lawsuits filed against it by creditors or involving contract disputes? YES / NO .
If "YES," please explain. (With regard to judgments, include jurisdiction and date of final judgment or dismissal.)
Response:
5. Does the Proposer have any outstanding or pending judgments against it? YES / NO .
Is the Proposer experiencing financial distress or having difficulty securing financing? YES / NO .
TITAN COURT BOOKSTORE MANAGEMENT ATT D Does the Proposer have sufficient cash flow to fund day-to-day operations throughout the proposed contract period? YES / NO
If "YES” on the first question or second question, or “NO” on the third question, please provide additional details.
Response:
6. Within the last three years, has the Proposer filed a bankruptcy action, filed for reorganization, made a general assignment of assets for the benefit of creditors, or had an action for insolvency instituted against it? YES / NO .
If "YES," indicate the filing dates, jurisdictions, type of action, ultimate resolution, and dates of judgment or dismissal, if applicable.
Response:
7. Does the Proposer have all required licenses, insurance and/or registrations, if any, and is Proposer legally authorized to do business in the State of Oregon? YES /NO .
If "NO," please explain.
Response:
8. Pay Equity Certificate. This certificate is required if the Proposer employs 50 or more full-time workers and the prospective contract price is estimated to exceed $500,000. [This requirement does not apply to architectural, engineering, photogrammetric mapping, transportation planning or land surveying and related services contracts.] Does a current authorized representative of the Proposer possess an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Department of Administrative Services? YES / NO / N/A . [If the certificate was provided with the Bid or Proposal submitted for a solicitation related to the prospective contract, then it is not necessary to resubmit it. Just indicate “see Bid” or “see Proposal” in the response field. Otherwise, if applicable, submit a copy of the certificate with this form.]
Response:
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
By signature below, the undersigned Authorized Representative on behalf of the Proposer certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that the responses provided on this form are complete, accurate, and not misleading.
Proposer Name: RFP:
Project Name:
Authorized Signature Date
Print Name Title
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .