Attachment D.2 - Past Performance Survey.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NTX Fort Worth MRI Storage Solution Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25725Q0703
About this file
Attachment D.2 is a Past Performance Survey document related to a storage services solicitation for an MRI system by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 17. The survey appears designed to collect detailed information about a vendor's prior performance history, likely to help evaluate their capability to provide MRI storage solutions for the Fort Worth facility. While the specific survey questions are not visible in the provided file excerpt, past performance surveys typically request comprehensive details about previous contract execution, including project scope, client satisfaction, contract value, performance metrics, and references that demonstrate the vendor's technical competence and reliability in delivering similar storage infrastructure services.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 36C25725Q0703 0003.pdf | ||
| 36C25725Q0703 0001 Amendment.pdf | ||
| 36C25725Q0703.pdf | ||
| Attachment D.1 - Wage Determination 2015-5231 Rev. 29.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
36C25725Q0703 – MRI Cryo Storage
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor's Name:
Contractor’s Address:
Contract #:
Contract Dollar Value:
COR/POC:
COR/POC Ph #:
Contracting Officer:
Contracting Officer’s Ph #:
B. SERVICES PERFORMED:
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor's performance or situation.
1 - Unsatisfactory. Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
2 - Marginal. Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
3 - None. No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
4 - Satisfactory. Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
5 - Very Good. Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
6 - Exceptional. Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly efficient manner.
E. DIRECTIONS
Please provide comments for all questions in which an Unsatisfactory or Marginal rating is given and as appropriate for all other answers. Space for your comments is provided in each area. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets to the end of the questionnaire and reference the respective question.
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DELEGATED COR or POC
The contractor:
1. Provided experienced/qualified personnel to perform services.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A
Remarks______________________________________________________________________
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. Also provide coverage with qualified personnel during periods of leave or absence .
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A
Remarks_____________________________________________________________________
3. Met established schedules.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A
Remarks______________________________________________________________________
4. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A
Remarks______________________________________________________________________
5. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A Remarks_____________________________________________________________________
6. Performed work that met or exceeded acceptable levels.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A
Remarks_____________________________________________________________________
7. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A
Remarks______________________________________________________________________
8. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A
Remarks______________________________________________________________________
9. Would you recommend award of another contract to this contractor? Yes No
Remarks_____________________________________________________________________
| _________________________________ | ____________ | |
| Signature of COR/POC | date |
Return surveys to Romya Turner at Romya.turner@va.gov or Shannon Hodgson at Shannon.hodgson@va.gov no later than 10:00AM CST July 14, 2025.
Past Performance Form version 1.1 p. 1 of 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .