Attachment D-7 Past Performance Questionnaire - RFQ 36C24824Q0603.pdf

PDF 217 KB Posted

Attached to
Amendment 0001 - Off-site Cancer Registry Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24824Q0603
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 8

About this file

This solicitation requests offers for off-site cancer registry services. The Department of Veterans Affairs, VISN 08, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center requires catch-up and maintenance of an accurate cancer registry database in compliance with Commission on Cancer standards and VA requirements. Services shall be provided virtually and off-site by certified tumor registrars or oncology data specialists with a minimum of three years experience. The base period of performance is one year from May 2024 to April 2025, with four optional one-year extensions. Offers are due by March 11, 2024 and must meet SDVOSB set-aside requirements. The place of performance is the contractor's facility for the benefit of the Malcom Randall VAMC in Gainesville, Florida.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Off-site Cancer Registry Services

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)

Network Contracting Office - 8

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by Raimundo Rivera, the VA Contract Specialist to assist with establishing the performance history for the Company (Quoter) named below for which this Past Performance Questionnaire is being completed. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed past performance questionnaire directly to raimundo.rivera@va.gov. If there is not enough space provided, please attach additional information/pages to this questionnaire. Please return the past performance questionnaire on or before 3/18/2024 directly to raimundo.rivera@va.gov.

1. Name of Contractor: Contract #

Title/Description of Services: _____________________________ Location of performance: _________

Based upon the definitions below, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance. Your assessment should consider the quoter’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements. Please include the period of performance (POP) and contract value:

POP: ___________________________________ Total contract value ($): _________________________

2. Brief description of scope of work performed by Company (Quoter): ________________________________

3. Any terminations for cause or default? Circle YES or NO

If yes, brief explanation: ________________________________________________________________

4. Any contract discrepancy reports filed? Circle YES or NO

If yes, brief explanation: ________________________________________________________________

Point of Contact/Contracting Officer’s Representative:

Name: _______________________

Title: ________________________ Telephone Number: ____________ Email address: _____________

5. Please answer the following questions pertaining to the relevancy of the services provided to you as compared to the description in paragraph 2.

Question 1: Did the contractor provide Certified Tumor Registrars (CTR) / Oncology Data Specialists (ODS) that were certified by the National Cancer Registrars Association to perform Cancer Registry Services? Yes or No

If no, brief explanation: _______________________________________________________

Question 2: Did the contractor provide Cancer Registry Services consisting of any of the following:

Case Abstracting, Follow-ups, Case Findings, Consultation? Yes or No

If yes, what types of services? __________________________________________________

Question 3: Was the contractor able to successfully meet the staffing needs of the contract without interruption of services due to a shortage of contractor assigned Certified CTR/ODS personnel? Yes or No

If no, brief explanation: ________________________________________________________

RFQ 36C24824Q0603

mailto:raimundo.rivera@va.gov mailto:raimundo.rivera@va.gov

Assessment Definition

Completed scheduled services in a timely manner per the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

O A S U

Compliance with contractual Terms and Conditions. O A S U

Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified k e y personnel during the contract period.

O A S U

Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

O A S U

Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to the quoter’s quality control procedures.

O A S U

Exhibited knowledge of and compliance with Government (or other) regulations and industry standards.

O A S U

How effective was the quoter in responding to urgent requests in a timely manner per the Performance Work Statement (PWS)?

O A S U

To what extent was the quoter able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from procurement or technical staff.

O A S U

Provides timely and accurate documents, records, and invoices as required by the contract.

O A S U

Would you award similar contracts to this quoter? Please provide explanation for your response in the additional comments section.

YES NO

Rate the Quoter’s OVERALL quality of performance under the contract performed.

O A S U

EXPLANATION OF OVERALL QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE RATING GIVEN:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (as required): ________________________________________________

Name of Assessor: __________________ Signature: __________________ Date: __________

Position Title: Phone:

Company/Agency: ______________________________ Email: _____________________

The Quoter’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions were taken by the quoter.

Outstanding (O)

Above Average (A) The Quoter’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the quoter were effective.

Satisfactory (S) The Quoter’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the quoter were satisfactory.

Unacceptable (U) Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the quoter has yet to identify corrective actions or the quoter’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

RFQ 36C24824Q0603

EVALUATION: Please rate the quoter using the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. Rate by placing an (X) in the appropriate rating box.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .