ATTACHMENT C - PPQ.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
EAP Counseling Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
60RRBH22R0007
Issued by
Railroad Retirement Board

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to EAP Counseling Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
ATTACHMENT A - T-83_District Office Addresses.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT B - EAP Quality Survey.docx DOCX document
RFP SOL 60RRBH22R0007 EAP Services.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

60RRBH22R0007

EAP Services

ATTACHMENT C

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Contractor: ________________________________ Reference Organization: ___________________ Name of Contact: _________________________ Date: ___________________________________

Please check the box with the applicable response for the questions below.

1. Direct applicability:

The RRB is considering this contractor to provide Employee Assistance Program (EAP) services (24/7 web enabled, phone based accessibility, on-site counseling for behavioral health, family, domestic, alcohol/drug use/dependency, health education, etc…). Did this contractor perform this specific type of service for your organization?

☐ Positively yes, the referenced contractor provided virtually identical services ☐ Basically yes, the referenced contractor provided generally similar services ☐ The referenced contractor provided slightly related services ☐ The referenced contractor provided fundamentally different services

Comments:

2.Overall customer satisfaction:
Overall, how satisfied were you with the services this contractor provided?

☐ Very satisfied with every aspect of the service ☐ Relatively satisfied ☐ Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied ☐ Relatively dissatisfied ☐ Services were unacceptable

Comments:

3. Key personnel:

Overall, how satisfied were you with the qualifications of the personnel provided to fulfill the requirements of the Contract?

☐ Very satisfied with the personnel provided ☐ Relatively satisfied ☐ Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied ☐ Relatively dissatisfied ☐ Services were unacceptable

4. Which of the following statements is most representative of the contractor’s ability to resolve issues/problems (major or minor) during the life of your EAP services (please select one):

☐ There were limited to no contractor issues during the life of the contract.

☐ There were contractor issues during the life of the contract; however, they were minor in nature and when addressed with the contractor, resolution was expedient and accurate.

☐ Issues were encountered. Resolution was adequately responsive with some lingering and/or minor inaccuracies in the contractor’s approach to resolving the issue.

☐ Significant issues were encountered. While generally resolved, resolution was unnecessarily delayed and inaccuracies or inefficiencies existed.

☐ Issues were encountered and the contractor either would not or could not remedy the matter.

Comments:

5. Taking the entire project into account, would you use this contractor again?

☐ Yes, definitely ☐ Yes, but with certain reservations ☐ Possibly ☐ Never

Comments:

6. Quality of items:

What was the quality of the services you received from this contractor?

☐ Of the highest quality/far exceeded my quality expectations/requirements ☐ Exceeded my quality expectations/requirements ☐ Met my quality expectations/requirements ☐ Below my expectations/requirements in terms of quality ☐ Regularly failed to meet my expectations/requirements in terms of quality Comments:

7.To what extent did the contractor display initiative and adaptability in meeting
requirements?

☐ The contractor exceeded my expectations in terms of displaying initiative and adaptability ☐ The contractor generally met my expectations in terms of displaying initiative and adaptability ☐ The contractor somewhat met my expectations in terms of displaying initiative and adaptability ☐ The contractor regularly failed to meet my expectations in terms of displaying initiative and adaptability

Comments:

8. Reliability and timeliness of performance:

Was the contractor reliable and timely in their delivery and performance of the services provided?

☐ Yes ☐ Mostly Yes. There were a few unavoidable delays. However, I was satisfied with the overall performance.

☐ There were more than an expected number of delays. The performance was overall acceptable, however, there were some issues in the contractor’s performance.

☐ No. There were an unacceptable number of delays and I could not rely on the contractor.

Comments:

9.Business relations:
Did the contractor cooperate with your organization on business and contractadministration issues?

☐ Yes, in every situation ☐ Yes, in most situations ☐ There were more than an expected number of business/contract issues. Overall, the contractor was cooperative; however, the issues were more than expected and/or could not be resolved by the contractor.

☐ No. The contractor was uncooperative and/or unresponsive to business/contract matters.

Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .