ATTACHMENT C - PPQ.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EAP Counseling Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 60RRBH22R0007
- Issued by
- Railroad Retirement Board
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATTACHMENT A - T-83_District Office Addresses.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT B - EAP Quality Survey.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP SOL 60RRBH22R0007 EAP Services.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
60RRBH22R0007
EAP Services
ATTACHMENT C
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contractor: ________________________________ Reference Organization: ___________________ Name of Contact: _________________________ Date: ___________________________________
Please check the box with the applicable response for the questions below.
1. Direct applicability:
The RRB is considering this contractor to provide Employee Assistance Program (EAP) services (24/7 web enabled, phone based accessibility, on-site counseling for behavioral health, family, domestic, alcohol/drug use/dependency, health education, etc…). Did this contractor perform this specific type of service for your organization?
☐ Positively yes, the referenced contractor provided virtually identical services ☐ Basically yes, the referenced contractor provided generally similar services ☐ The referenced contractor provided slightly related services ☐ The referenced contractor provided fundamentally different services
Comments:
| 2. | Overall customer satisfaction: |
| Overall, how satisfied were you with the services this contractor provided? |
☐ Very satisfied with every aspect of the service ☐ Relatively satisfied ☐ Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied ☐ Relatively dissatisfied ☐ Services were unacceptable
Comments:
3. Key personnel:
Overall, how satisfied were you with the qualifications of the personnel provided to fulfill the requirements of the Contract?
☐ Very satisfied with the personnel provided ☐ Relatively satisfied ☐ Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied ☐ Relatively dissatisfied ☐ Services were unacceptable
4. Which of the following statements is most representative of the contractor’s ability to resolve issues/problems (major or minor) during the life of your EAP services (please select one):
☐ There were limited to no contractor issues during the life of the contract.
☐ There were contractor issues during the life of the contract; however, they were minor in nature and when addressed with the contractor, resolution was expedient and accurate.
☐ Issues were encountered. Resolution was adequately responsive with some lingering and/or minor inaccuracies in the contractor’s approach to resolving the issue.
☐ Significant issues were encountered. While generally resolved, resolution was unnecessarily delayed and inaccuracies or inefficiencies existed.
☐ Issues were encountered and the contractor either would not or could not remedy the matter.
Comments:
5. Taking the entire project into account, would you use this contractor again?
☐ Yes, definitely ☐ Yes, but with certain reservations ☐ Possibly ☐ Never
Comments:
6. Quality of items:
What was the quality of the services you received from this contractor?
☐ Of the highest quality/far exceeded my quality expectations/requirements ☐ Exceeded my quality expectations/requirements ☐ Met my quality expectations/requirements ☐ Below my expectations/requirements in terms of quality ☐ Regularly failed to meet my expectations/requirements in terms of quality Comments:
| 7. | To what extent did the contractor display initiative and adaptability in meeting |
| requirements? |
☐ The contractor exceeded my expectations in terms of displaying initiative and adaptability ☐ The contractor generally met my expectations in terms of displaying initiative and adaptability ☐ The contractor somewhat met my expectations in terms of displaying initiative and adaptability ☐ The contractor regularly failed to meet my expectations in terms of displaying initiative and adaptability
Comments:
8. Reliability and timeliness of performance:
Was the contractor reliable and timely in their delivery and performance of the services provided?
☐ Yes ☐ Mostly Yes. There were a few unavoidable delays. However, I was satisfied with the overall performance.
☐ There were more than an expected number of delays. The performance was overall acceptable, however, there were some issues in the contractor’s performance.
☐ No. There were an unacceptable number of delays and I could not rely on the contractor.
Comments:
| 9. | Business relations: | |
| Did the contractor cooperate with your organization on business and contract | administration issues? |
☐ Yes, in every situation ☐ Yes, in most situations ☐ There were more than an expected number of business/contract issues. Overall, the contractor was cooperative; however, the issues were more than expected and/or could not be resolved by the contractor.
☐ No. The contractor was uncooperative and/or unresponsive to business/contract matters.
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .