Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
J045--811310 | Boiler Preventative Maintenance Services | Pittsburgh VA Healthcare System | SDVOSB-Set Aside | Amendment 3
Solicitation number
36C24425Q0529
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a boiler preventative maintenance services contract (Solicitation Number 36C24425Q0529) issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration. The solicitation is a Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside with NAICS Code 811310, seeking an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract for preventative maintenance and inspection services of boiler systems, specifically parallel position combustion control systems and fire tube boilers including Fireye components.

Key details include a solicitation close date of May 9th, 2025 at 3:00 PM, with question submissions accepted until April 30th, 2025 at 3:00 PM Eastern Time. Vendors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database to be eligible for award. The questionnaire provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing contractor performance across quality of services, timeliness of performance, and business relations, using an adjectival rating system ranging from Excellent to Unsatisfactory. The contract will be issued on a Standard Form 1449 and includes Service Contract Act Wage Determinations.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT C

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C24425Q0529

Boiler Preventative Maintenance

PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO ERIC CHRISTY, AT ERIC.CHRISTY@VA.GOV. SOLICITATION CLOSE DATE IS MAY 9TH, 2025 AT 3:00PM.:

I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Negotiated price or cost at award:

Current estimated contract dollar amount:

Describe service acquired:

II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:

Name:

Organization:

Phone Number:

Relation to Program:

(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, etc.)

Time On Contract:

III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under pars. III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance Adjectival Rating under par. III.F based on the attached Adjectival Rating Descriptions. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.

PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.

EXCELLENT
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

A. QUALITY OF SERVICES

1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), necessary equipment which is properly maintained, quality control for the performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.

2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’sspecific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing anyadministrative reports/documents required by your contract.

2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

C. BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correctnoncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous andresponsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff?

2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

D. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:

E. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

YES |_| NO |_|

If no, please explain:

F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .