Attachment C-Evaluation Criteria-Regulated Medical Waste and Sharps Removal Services.pdf
PDF 110 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24723Q0052
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24723Q0052_3.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24723Q0052_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D-Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment F-Clauses.pdf | ||
| 36C24723Q0052_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A-Regulated Medical Waste _ Sharps Removal-PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment E-Price _ Cost Schedule.pdf | ||
| Attachment B-QASP Regulated Medical Waste _ Sharps Removal.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECHNICAL EVALUATION
SOLICITATION NO:
SERVICES REQUIRED: Regulated Medical Waste & Sharps Disposal for Birmingham VAMC.
CONTRACTOR: __________________________________________________________________
Award shall be based on Best Value. Award will be made based on best overall proposal considering
Technical Approach, Management Plan, and Past Performance. Non-price factors are all evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. To be considered technically acceptable all offerors must receive a satisfactory rating for all factors.
EVALUATION FACTORS RESULTS (ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE)
Technical Approach / Supplier Capability: Have the capability to provide the requested services to Birmingham VA Healthcare System in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW).
a. Offeror must provide business licenses with the proposal.
b. Offeror must provide business insurance with the proposal.
c. Offer must be in business for five or more years.
d. Offeror must provide capabilities statement specifying the ability to provide the requested services to the Birmingham
VA Healthcare System in accordance with the Statement of
Work (SOW).
Management/Quality Control Approach/ Contractor Provided, on-site adequate containers to meet the government needs.
a. Offer must provide a Department of Transportation number for transport of general waste.
b. Offer must submit a Management Plan addressing the process of how waste will be transported and disposed including contingency plans if normal process is disrupted.
Experience/Past Performance: Offeror shall possess at least five (5) years of documented experience providing the services outlined in the statement of work. Offerors shall provide at least three (3) references and two (2) evaluations showing they successfully completed contracts that demonstrate previous work experience in providing regulated medical waste disposal services at a medical facility.
COMMENTS:_________________________________________________________________________
OVERALL RATING:_________________________________
Basis of Award
Project: Birmingham VA Medical Center, 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, AL 35233.
Award shall be based on Best Value. Award will be made based on best overall proposal considering
Technical, Management Plan, and Past Performance. Non-price factors are all evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. To be considered technically acceptable all offerors must receive a satisfactory rating for all factors.
**ALL factors must be rated ACCEPTABLE to be considered for award.
Non-Cost/Price Factors
Each factor will be scored as Acceptable or Unacceptable as defined below. Each proposal will be evaluated against the SOW and the stated evaluation criteria. Each proposal is evaluated using the same standards "Best Value based on the best overall proposal Evaluation Standards.
Acceptable
ALL of the minimum acceptable criteria are clearly met by the proposal. The offeror's proposal meets the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW. NOTE: Once the proposals have been determined to be "technically acceptable," award will based on Best Value.
Unacceptable
Not all of the minimum acceptable criteria are met by the proposal. An unacceptable proposal contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal fails to meet specified minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the SOW.
The following table will be used for each proposal received to score each “Best Value” factor as to whether it is Acceptable or Unacceptable.
Non-Cost/Price Factors Offerer Technically acceptable
Technical Approach __________________________________________________________
Management/Quality Control Approach ___________________________________________
Relevant Experience/Past Performance ____________________________________________
DATE COMPLETED__________________________________________________________________
EVALUATOR :_______________________________________________________________________
PRINT SIGNATURE
TITLE:______________________________________________________________________________
PRINT PH#
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .