Attachment B Past Performance Questionnaire CMS Next Generation SOL 959P0025Q0017.pdf
PDF 128 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Client Management System (CMS) Next Generation
- Solicitation number
- 959P0025Q0017
- Issued by
-
Pretrial Services Agency
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by the Pretrial Services Agency, designed to evaluate a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions. The form provides a comprehensive assessment framework with response codes ranging from Exceptional (EX) to Unsatisfactory (US), covering key performance areas such as quality of products/services, overall performance, schedule adherence, technical requirements, cost control, subcontracting success, and customer satisfaction. The evaluator is asked to rate the contractor's performance in routine and unexpected situations, and provide insights into the contractor's weak and strong points, as well as the likelihood of awarding future contracts. The document is marked as Source Selection Sensitive Information and is to be protected accordingly, highlighting its importance in the federal contract selection process.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT B
Past Performance Questionnaire
ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Pretrial Services Agency 633 Indiana Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR
1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS 3. CONTRACT NO.:
CONTRACT DATE:
4. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
4. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE:
5. COMPLETION DATE:
6. CONTRACT VALUE $
2. PROJECT NAME: 7. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:
Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
9. NAME AND ADDRESS OF EVALUATING ORGANIZATION:
EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other)
EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor:
EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal
US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed
Quality of Products and Services- Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Overall Performance- Assess the Contractor’s overall performance for the project.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).
EX VG S MG US N/O
Technical Requirements- Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Cost Control- Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Subcontracting- Assess the Contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in
UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this Contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.
EX VG S MG US N/O
List Contractor’s Weak Points:
List Contractor’s Strong Points:
List any other projects this Contractor has completed for you:
If an award fee contract, what was the average award fee % earned?
| ATTACHMENT C |
| Past Performance Questionnaire |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .