Attachment B Past Performance Questionnaire 2022 03 24.docx

General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service Region 1

Request for Proposal Attachment: Offeror’s Past Performance Questionnaire for GSA North Troy Port Hardening, North Troy Vt

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY, SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (FAR 3.104)

INSTRUCTIONS: The offeror must complete Section 1, 2, and 3 on this form, contact their clients, forward this form to the client point of contact, and request the client reference complete Section 4 and the past performance questionnaire (pages 3 – 4). Client references should refer to page 5 to mark the technical complexity of work in Section 4. Any requested explanations in Sections 1 – 4 must be limited to no more than 500 characters (with spaces) unless otherwise specified. The past performance evaluation will include the past performance of the offerors the prime contractor on similar projects (refer to solicitation for definition of similar project).

SECTION 1: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

Email Address:

Unique Entity Identifier Number (e.g. DUNS):

SECTION 2: CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract No.:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Project Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences (limited to 500 characters):

Original Contract Price:

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications):

Explain Differences (limited to 500 characters):

Provide a brief description of the project to support the extent to which the submitted example of past performance meets the definition of Similar Project (see solicitation). The project description is limited to no more than 500 words (may attach as a separate page).

Project: North Troy Port Hardening

1 | P a g e

SECTION 3: CLIENT INFORMATION

Reference Name and Title:

Reference Phone Number:

Reference Email Address:

SECTION 4: PROJECT DETAILS

Technical Complexity of Work (Refer to page 5 to verify the indicated technical complexity of work):

High Medium Low

Describe how the referenced project adhered to the baseline schedule. Describe any reasons for schedule deviations in the offeror’s past performance sample project(s) and what the team did in order to meet the schedule. Were there any change orders either customer driven or contractor driven and how was any impact solidified in the schedule?

Describe any reasons for deviation from the original proposed price. Identify any measures that either saved the project money or resulted in cost overruns. For instance, these metrics may be in the numbers of RFI’s adverted, change orders averted, value engineering employed, and or cost/claim items.

Does the project use a design-build delivery method? Yes No Did the offeror perform work as the prime contractor? Yes No

4 | P a g e

INSTRUCTIONS: Clients should complete past performance questionnaire (PPQ) (pages 3 and 4 of this attachment) and review Offeror’s Relevant Experience Attachment (to ensure contractor completed information is correct). Clients are also requested to complete Section 4 on page 2. The PPQ should be returned to the offeror to be submitted in response to GSA Solicitation No. 47PB0022R0033 and the indicated client reference should sign the PPQ. If requested by the offeror, then the client may submit the completed PPQ directly to Sebastian.asaro@gsa.gov).

INSTRUCTIONS: Please mark the adjective rating which best reflects your evaluation of the contractor’s performance. The client may attach pages or increase the row height to any fields that request a written response if the box does not provide sufficient space. Refer to page 6 for the definitions of adjectival ratings. Narrative responses for each rating factor (quality, schedule/timeliness of performance, management, customer satisfaction, and general) are limited to 24,000 characters. If additional space is necessary, the blocks for explanations may be expanded or page(s) may be attached to the PPQ.

The overall perceived quality of the services and product.

Effectiveness of identification of issues in quality of work and correction of deficient work.

Effectiveness of independent technical reviews and ability to address and review comments.

Ability to develop a design within stated specifications, requirements, and the scope of work and deliver a final product in accordance with the plans and drawings.

Note: If applicable, provide an explanation of resolution measures. Describe any evident measures attributed to the quality rating.

Compliance with delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones, including the completion of punch list items.

Timeliness responding to questions, comments, and requests for changes as well as incorporation of comments into the development of final product.

Timeliness in completion of administrative activities such as invoices, security clearances, furnishing of any O&M manuals, an

Note: Describe transparency of project schedule and any other processes or tools utilized to ensure timeliness of overall project delivery. Describe any issues in timeliness and whether the contractor adequately implemented corrective action to maintain or improve the schedule.

Effectiveness of management and coordination of activities to ensure incorporation of input from all stakeholders and produce a solution aligned with requirements, scope, and specifications.

Effectiveness in the management solution with overall constructability1.

Effectiveness of business relationship with the design firm

Effectiveness of quality control/quality assurance processes to produce a product of stated quality or better while successfully controlling costs/price.

Note: Describe efforts taken by contractor to manage the overall quality of the product. Describe how contractor’s efforts to integrate and coordinate activities contributed to achievement of project goals and objectives.

Provide a rating of the overall customer satisfaction with the project.

GENERAL PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

Would you hire or work with this firm again? Yes No

Were liquidated damages assessed? Yes No

Provide any additional remarks with specific events or actions to justify whether or not the firm would (or would not) be recommended.

1 “Constructability” means “…the effective and timely integration of construction knowledge into the conceptual planning, design, construction, and field operations of a project to achieve the overall project objectives in the best possible time and accuracy at the most cost-effective levels.” (Source: Construction Management Institute, Constructability (Best Practice) RT003-Topic Summary)

INFORMATION: Use the following to describe or verify the technical complexity of the project.

commercial services (such as grounds keeping)

design and construction services for repairs and alterations to real property financial support services

5 | P a g e

INFORMATION: Use the following adjective ratings and definitions in your evaluation of the Contractor’s performance.

6 | P a g e