ATTACHMENT B-Past Performance Questionaire.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
ID/IQ for Regulatory Consultant, Non-Personal Services
Solicitation number
W911QY20R0007
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract to provide regulatory consulting services on a non-personal basis to the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command. The contractor will be expected to provide senior regulatory experts to consult on projects involving FDA regulations, quality auditing, FDA package submissions, and other related task areas. Responses are due no later than the time specified in the notice and shall be submitted electronically to the email address provided, with a courtesy copy to a second email address. Questions are due by 30 November 2020 and shall be sent to the primary point of contact with a courtesy copy to a second individual. The requirement is being solicited using full and open competition, with both small and other than small businesses eligible to respond. The associated NAICS code is 541714 with a small business size standard of 1,000 employees.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT B: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________

POC:________________________Title:________________________
(Name)(E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

____________________________________________________________________________________ (Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

1. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

1. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

1. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Good

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

1. Effectiveness of Management (manage the overall contract effectively and efficiently)

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

1. Contractor’s overall ability to manage Subcontractors

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

1. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

1. Contractor’s responsiveness to contract requirements and changes

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

1. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

1. (Transition) Contractor’s overall ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel?

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

1. (Transition) Contractor’s ability to hire fully qualified labor?

□ Outstanding (90-100%)

□ Good (80-90%)

□ Acceptable (70-80%)

□ Marginal (60-70%)

□ Unsatisfactory (50-60%)

Comments:

1. (Transition/Fill Rates) Contractor’s ability to hire (in days)?

□ Outstanding (7-14 days)

□ Good (14-21 days)

□ Acceptable (21-28 days)

□ Marginal (29-36 days)

□ Unsatisfactory (37-45 days)

Comments:

1. Given the choice, would you award the same effort to this Contractor again?

□ YES

□ NO

Comments:

1. General Comments. Provide and other relevant information.

1. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company? If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

1. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

_____________________________________________________
SignatureDate

Typed or Printed Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .