Attachment A-Past Performance Questionaire.pdf

PDF 107 KB Posted

Attached to
FBI Academy Quantico Lead Cleaning and Janitorial Services
Solicitation number
15F06723R0000050
Issued by

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for lead cleaning and janitorial services at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. The opportunity is a combined synopsis and solicitation seeking proposals from socio-economic small businesses for lead cleaning and janitorial support. Interested vendors must register to attend an optional site visit by March 28, 2023. Proposals are due by April 28, 2023. The contract will have a maximum period of five years and support lead cleaning of firing ranges and associated areas. Vendors must have a lead compliance plan and lead management safety plan meeting OSHA requirements. The North American Industry Classification System code is 562910 for remediation services and the small business size standard is $22 million. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is the contracting agency.

View the file

Other files

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

15F06723R0000050 Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 3.104

For Official Use Only

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The below-named contractor is being considered for award of a contract for Solicitation:

15F06723R0000050, Quantico Lead Cleaning.

A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments.

Please refer any questions to Dennis Alber at dgalber@fbi.gov and Andre Wilson at alwilson6@fbi.gov.

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

Contractor’s Name:_____________________________________________________________

Address:______________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number: ______________________ Point of Contact: _______________________

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION

Name: __________________________________ Title: _____________________________

Organization & Address: ________________________________________________________

Telephone: ___________________ Fax: ________________ Email: ____________________

C. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number/Title: __________________________________________________________

Period of Performance: _________________ Dollar Amount of Contract: _________________

Services Performed:

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

mailto:dgalber@fbi.gov mailto:alwilson6@fbi.gov

For Official Use Only

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

A ACCEPTABLE - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

UA UNACCEPTABLE – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE

Please use the above ratings to describe the contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. HISTORY COMPLETING EFFORTS INVOLVING DESIGN, CARPENTRY, ROAD

REPAIR, ROOFING, EXCAVATION, INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL,

HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING, PLUMBING, SHEET METAL,

PAINTING, DEMOLITION, CONCRETE MASONRY, AND WELDING.

(PRICE RANGE OF $2,000.00 THROUGH $750,000.00)

a. Contractor had professional and qualified management team A UA N/A

b. Contractor provided submittals timely A UA N/A

c. Contractor was able to complete project within budget A UA N/A

d. Contractor successfully completed construction as designed A UA N/A

e. Were Contractor change order/equitable adjustment requests reasonable

A UA N/A

f. Contractor’s overall quality of service A UA N/A

COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________

2. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

a. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.

A UA N/A

b. Contractor maintained appropriate staffing levels (number/ qualifications)

A UA N/A

For Official Use Only

COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________

3. QUALITY OF SERVICE AND WORKMANSHIP

a. Contractor maintained acceptable standards of workmanship A UA N/A

b. Contractor provided acceptable-quality materials A UA N/A

c. Contractor’s overall quality of service A UA N/A

4. TIMELINESS/ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULES

a. Contractor completed scheduled tasks within stated time frames

A UA N/A

b. Contractor was proactive in keeping you informed of schedule changes if they were going to occur

A UA N/A

c. Contractor responded to emergency requirements in a timely manner

A UA N/A

d. Overall contractor timeliness A UA N/A

COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________

5. QUALITY CONTROL

a. Contractor provided an adequate quality control plan A UA N/A

b. Contractor adhered to its quality control plan A UA N/A

c. Contractor’s quality control resulted in little/no work on your part to achieve acceptable service (i.e.-few failed inspections)

A UA N/A

c. Contractor effectively managed materials requirements (i.e., maintained adequate stock levels)

A UA N/A

d. Contractor effectively oversaw/managed subcontractors A UA N/A

e. Contractor’s overall management effectiveness A UA N/A

For Official Use Only

d. Contractor documented its quality control checks/corrective actions

A UA N/A

e. Contractor’s overall quality control A UA N/A

COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________

6. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

a. Contractor maintained a professional working relationship A UA N/A

b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in resolving customer complaints

A UA N/A

c. Contractor was flexible in responding to customer requirements

A UA N/A

d. Overall customer satisfaction A UA N/A

COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________

7. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL/LABOR/SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

a. Environmental requirements A UA N/A

b. Labor laws A UA N/A

c. Workplace safety A UA N/A

d. Overall compliance A UA N/A

8. OVERALL PAST PERFORMANCE RATING:

For Official Use Only

9. If a Government contract, did the contractor receive any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices? __________ If yes, please describe:

10. If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this contractor? Please explain response below.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .