Attachment 9 asbestos lead Survey Report Bedford Bldg 80_2-15-11 Final.pdf

PDF 6 MB Posted Mar 29, 2023

Attached to: C1DA--518-22-101 ADA-Barrier Free Restrooms - Phase I AE Design
Solicitation number: 36C24123R0110
Issued by: Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 1

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
36C24123R0110.docx	DOCX document	Mar 29, 2023
Attachment 8 asbestos lead Survey Report Bedford Bldg 62_2-15-11 Final.pdf	PDF	Mar 29, 2023
Attachments 10-14 - Drawings.pdf	PDF	Mar 29, 2023
SOW 518-22-101 Barrier Free Restrooms wo attachments.pdf	PDF	Mar 29, 2023

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

VOLUME II

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL &

LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

SURVEY REPORT

BUILDING 80

VISN 1

Bedford VA Medical Center

200 Springs Road Bedford, Massachusetts

Project No. 2009023.008

February 15, 2011

5 Alfred Circle Bedford, MA 01730-2318

Telephone: (781) 275-6050 Toll Free: (800) 877-6050 Facsimile: (781) 275-5651 info@mabbett.com www.mabbett.com

VHABEDSanfoM Text Box Attachment 9

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead Containing Paint (LCP) Building Survey Report was prepared for the Veterans Affairs (VA) New England Healthcare System (VISN 1) in accordance with an established scope of work as defined in Contract Number VA241-P-1653. The information presented herein is based on the facts and information conveyed to or received by Mabbett & Associates, Inc. (M&A) during the preparation of this report. If any of the information provided to M&A that was used in preparing this report is incorrect, incomplete, or subject to change, M&A would wish to alter its opinion(s) accordingly. In addition, the professional opinions and information contained in this report are based solely on the requirements of the applicable regulations and technical data as known to M&A as of the date of this report and considered applicable to this report.

This individual building report within Volume II, which contains building specific lead and asbestos findings, is part of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report consisting of the following volumes:

Volume I - General

Chapter 1 - Introduction and Executive Summary Chapter 2 - Asbestos Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Plan Chapter 3 - Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Survey Tables Chapter 4 - Lead Containing Paint Survey Tables

Volume II – Individual Building Reports

Individual Building Reports Chapters including:

Cover page with building number Building narrative summary Floor plans Relevant asbestos findings for the building Relevant lead containing paint findings for the building Relevant photos

Volume III – Appendices and Supporting Data

Appendix A - Asbestos Laboratory Analysis Reports and Laboratory Certifications Appendix B - Inspector Field Data Sheets/Chains-of-Custody Appendix C - Personnel Certifications & Licenses Appendix D - XRF Performance Characteristics/Calibration Records Appendix E - Lead Laboratory Analysis Reports and Laboratory Certifications (If Applicable)

Volume IV – HUD Residential LBP Reports (If Applicable)

This report was prepared by the following Mabbett & Associates, Inc. personnel:

Michael F. Delaney Project Manager Massachusetts Asbestos Inspector AI031436 Massachusetts Management Planner AP000048

This report has been reviewed and approved by:

MABBETT & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Robert K. McKinley, MPH, CIH, LIH Director of Industrial Hygiene Services Massachusetts Asbestos Inspector AI000314

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Description Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Sampling Methodology

3.2 Analytical Methodology

3.3 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Findings

4.0 LEAD SCREENING SURVEY

4.1 Screening Survey Methodology

4.2 Summary of Lead Screening Survey Findings

5.0 LIMITATIONS

6.0 CLOSING REMARKS

6.1 Asbestos

6.2 Lead Containing Paint

Tables Table 1 – Specific Inaccessible Areas Table 2 – Summary of Positive ACM Samples Table 3 – Summary of XRF Measurements Above VISN 1 Threshold of >0.1 mg/cm2 Table 4 – Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results...... Appendix A Table 5 – Summary of XRF Measurements............................................................... Appendix B

Figures Figure 1 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 80, Basement Figure 2 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 80, Floor 1 Figure 3 – Lead Screening Survey Summary Plan - Building 80, Basement Figure 4 – Lead Screening Survey Summary Plan - Building 80, Floor 1

Appendices Appendix A – Table 4, Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results Appendix B – Table 5, Summary of XRF Measurements Appendix C – Representative Photographs of ACM Appendix D – Representative Photographs of Non-Intact Lead Containing Paint

1.0 INTRODUCTION & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Mabbett and Associates, Inc. (M&A), with Covino Environmental Associates, Inc. (Covino) as sub-contractors, performed surveys for suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACM) and screenings of suspect lead containing paint (LCP) surfaces utilizing an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzer. Surveys were performed of selected buildings at the VA Medical Center (VAMC) located at 200 Springs Road, Bedford, MA, under Contract VA241-P-1653. A complete list of buildings surveyed is in Volume I of this report. Site survey work was performed in July, 2010, by appropriately credentialed personnel as required. Collected suspect ACM samples were submitted to a certified analytical laboratory for asbestos analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) using positive stop methodology and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) where indicated. When necessary, paint chip samples were collected and submitted to a certified analytical laboratory for lead content analysis using atomic absorption spectroscopy. The survey effort involved the collection or screening of the following samples, resulting in the following conclusions:

100 bulk samples for suspect ACM were collected in this building.

Based on laboratory analysis of suspect ACM, 15 of the collected samples contained asbestos greater than or equal to 1%.

72 XRF analyzer screening measurements of building surfaces were taken in this building.

Based on XRF screening measurements, 19 of the XRF measurements revealed concentrations of lead in paint that exceeded 0.1 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2).

This building report consists of a summary of findings, floor plans that indicate positive sample locations, detailed analytical findings for the specific surveyed building materials, and photos of identified ACM and LCP, greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 and in an other than intact condition.

Laboratory certificates of analysis and field data sheets for this building report are available in Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

According to information provided by the VAMC Office of Facilities Management and observations made by the M&A team at the time of the survey, Building 80 was a two-story CWT/FMS/A&MM building built in 1960 and occupied approximately 22,955 square feet.

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Sampling Methodology

A visual screening inspection was conducted to identify locations of suspect ACM throughout the building by state licensed asbestos inspectors. Only areas that were accessible during the field work phase were inspected. Every effort was made during the initial field survey work to access areas as necessary to complete the survey; however, areas that remained inaccessible to the survey team are indicated in Table 1 below.

Table 1 – Specific Inaccessible Areas Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Building Floor Room

No.

Reason Area Was Inaccessible and Survey

Impacts, If Applicable

There were no inaccessible areas identified during this survey.

Other general areas that were inaccessible or where the survey was limited to visual observation only are identified below:

• Within walls • Within fire doors

• Enclosed pipe/duct chases • Inside mechanical equipment/ductwork

• Above fixed drywall or plaster ceilings

Due to these access restrictions, ACM surveys should be performed prior to any proposed renovations or maintenance involving inaccessible areas.

Bulk samples were collected of suspect ACM in accordance with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and VISN 1 approved M&A VISN 1 Survey Program Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Roofing materials were not sampled unless otherwise indicated in order to maintain applicable warranties. Bulk suspect ACM sampling was conducted according to the following sampling plan:

(a) Surfacing material:

(1) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is 1,000 ft2 or less.

(2) At least five bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 ft2 but less than or equal to 5,000 ft2.

(3) At least seven bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 5,000 ft2.

(b) Thermal system insulation:

(1) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area of thermal system insulation.

(2) At least one bulk sample shall be collected from each homogeneous area of patched area of thermal system insulation.

(3) Sufficient samples shall be collected from elbows and fittings to determine if it contains

ACM.

(4) Bulk samples shall not be collected from any homogeneous area where the state licensed asbestos inspector determined that the thermal system insulation is fiberglass, foam glass, rubber, or other non-ACM.

(1) At least one bulk sample shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is less than 100 ft2.

(2) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 100 ft2.

3.2 Analytical Methodology

The collected bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody procedures to ProScience Analytical Services, Inc. (ProScience) of Woburn, MA for polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis of bulk materials using EPA Method 600/R-93/116. When required, sample results that revealed trace concentrations (greater than 0% but less than or equal to 1%) of asbestos by PLM were analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. ProScience is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Lab Code 200090-0). Duplicate bulk samples were submitted for PLM analysis to Covino. Covino is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Lab Code 101781-0). A summary table containing the duplicate bulk sample results is provided in Volume I, Chapter 1, Table 4. Copies of the laboratory accreditations are included in Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

All bulk sample results are summarized in Table 4 – Summary of ACM Building Survey Results.

The EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Occupational Safety (DOS) defines any material that contains greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos as being an ACM. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) defines any material that contains equal to or greater than one percent (≥1%) asbestos as being an ACM. As such, the analytical laboratory identified bulk samples as positive for asbestos that met the regulatory criteria of equal to or greater than one percent (≥1%) asbestos.

3.3 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Findings

3.3.1 Data Tables, Laboratory Results, and Field Notes

Collected bulk samples confirmed by the analytical laboratory to contain ≥1% asbestos are listed in Table 2 - Summary of Positive ACM Samples. Samples analyzed by PLM containing trace levels of asbestos, defined as greater than 0% but less than 1%, are listed in Table 4 with the TEM analysis results. Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report includes copies of the laboratory certificates of analysis (including duplicate samples) and Inspector Data Sheets.

Table 2 - Summary of Positive ACM Samples Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Estimated Quantity Sample

No.

Sample

Location

ACM

Location Description of

Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Amount Units

Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

01A Hallway 01B B6 01C B6

Rooms B6, B007F and

Corridor

9"x9" Brown Floor Tile

5% Chrysotile

830 SF Good 4

06A Hallway 06B B4 06C Hallway

Throughout Basement

Duct Mastic 8%

Chrysotile 5,000 SF Damaged 3

08A B13 08B B20 08C B20

Rooms B13 and

B20

12"x12" Tan Floor Tile

10% Chrysotile

80 SF Good 4

10C B14 Throughout Basement

Brown Sheet Flooring

3% Chrysotile

900 SF Good 4

12A 12B 12C

B1 Mechanical Room B1

Duct Insulation 50%

Chrysotile, 10% Amosite

700 SF Damaged 1

13A Hallway 13B 123 13C 130

Throughout 1st Floor

12"x12" Off White Floor

Tile

3% Chrysotile

9,500 SF Good 4

18A 131 18B 131 18C 109

Throughout Building

Pipe Fitting Insulation

30% Chrysotile

150 EA Damaged 2

19 122 Kitchen Black Sink

Undercoating 3%

Chrysotile 1 EA Good 4

20A 20B 20C

Room 102

- Office 12"x12" Gray

Floor Tile 2%

Chrysotile 150 SF Good 4

23A 23B 23C

B1B Room B1B

- Bathroom

12"x12" Beige Speckled Floor

Tile Mastic

2% Chrysotile

45 SF Good 4

28A 28B 28C

B1A Room B1A

- Bathroom

Residual Black Mastic

3% Chrysotile

65 SF Good 4

29A 29B 29C

Exterior Exterior Window Glazing

2% Chrysotile

1,025 LF Damaged 3

30A 30B 30C

Exterior Exterior Window Caulking

3% Chrysotile

840 LF Damaged 3

31A 31B 31C

Exterior Exterior Door Caulking 5%

Chrysotile 250 LF Damaged 3

Table 2 - Summary of Positive ACM Samples Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Estimated Quantity Sample

No.

Sample

Location

ACM

Location Description of

Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Amount Units

Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

34A 34B 34C

Exterior Exterior Expansion

Joint Caulking 5%

Chrysotile 30 LF Damaged 4

NA NA

Bathrooms B1A & B1B

Pipe Insulation Identified in

Previous Survey

Confirmed

NA 40 LF Good 4

Footnotes: SF - Square Feet 1 - Analyzed by TEM LF - Linear Feet EA - Each CF - Cubic Feet

* The VISN 1 risk hazard assessment scale 1 – 4 is a relative indicator of the risk and need for response/remediation. (1) represents the highest priority (e.g. removal or encapsulation) whereas a (4) represents the lowest priority (monitor as part of 6 month O&M program). The rating assigned by an Asbestos Management Planner, takes into account: condition, friable vs. non-friable, accessibility, occupancy (e.g. continuous, intermittent or occasional and patients/staff/visitors), potential for air erosion, potential for vibration damage, potential for disturbance/damage (e.g. exposed and in an accessible location), and potential for water damage.

3.3.2 Photographs

Representative photographs of identified ACM are provided in Appendix C of this report.

3.3.3 CADD Drawings

The location of each collected bulk sample and its abridged sample ID is shown on the CADD drawings in the Figures Section of this report. The sample ID on the drawings has been abridged (by excluding the individual room number from the full sample ID) for aesthetic purposes. Each positive ACM sample location is colored red and marked with an asterisk (*), while stop positives are marked with two asterisks (**). Collected bulk samples that were not positive are identified solely by the abridged sample ID. Building areas containing ACM have been indicated with hatching to identify the location of the identified ACM.

4.0 LEAD SCREENING SURVEY

4.1 Screening Survey Methodology

M&A completed a Lead Containing Paint Risk Analysis in accordance with the SOP and determined that a LCP screening survey was warranted in this building. The LCP screening survey was performed by trained lead inspectors/screeners meeting the qualifications outlined in

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 6 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 80_2-15-11 FINAL.doc the SOP. The screening survey measured lead concentrations in accessible building surfaces by using a Niton XLp 303A XRF (serial number 18580). The XRF instrument was calibrated at the frequency specified in the SOP.

4.2 Summary of Lead Screening Survey Findings

4.2.1 Data Tables

As specified by VISN 1, a description of XRF-screened painted interior and exterior building components containing lead at concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/cm2 have been included in Table 3 below:

Table 3 - Summary of Positive XRF Measurements

Reading No.

Floor Location Substrate and Component

Side Condition Color Results

(mg/cm2)

2921 First 121 Metal Window

Casing East Intact White 0.14

2943 First Stairwell Metal Handrail North Intact White 4.9 2945 First Stairwell Metal Riser West Intact Gray 3.6 2946 First Stairwell Metal Stringer North Intact White 8.7

2957 Basement Exterior Metal Window

Casing West Intact Beige 0.22

2960 Basement Exterior Wood Door West Intact Red 3.4

2961 Basement Exterior Wood Door Casing West Intact Beige 0.6

2962 Basement Exterior Metal Lintel West Intact Beige 6.6

2965 Basement Exterior Metal Corner

Guard West Intact Yellow 6.4

2966 Basement Exterior Metal Window

Casing North Intact Beige 0.21

2967 Basement Exterior Metal Window

Sash North Intact Beige 0.4

2968 Basement Exterior Metal Window Sill North Intact Beige 0.4

2969 Basement Exterior Metal Lintel North Intact Beige 6.4

2970 Basement Exterior Metal Window

Casing East Intact Beige 0.3

2971 Basement Exterior Metal Window

Sash East Intact Beige 0.5

2972 Basement Exterior Metal Window Sill East Intact Beige 0.3

2973 First Exterior Metal Dock Edge South Intact Yellow 9.3 2974 First Exterior Metal Handrail South Intact Brown 4.6 2976 First Exterior Metal Guard Rail South Intact Yellow 2.4

In addition, XRF measurements collected during the screening survey of interior and exterior building components are included in Table 5 – Summary of XRF Measurements. Table 5 includes a description of each screened surface and resulting XRF-measured lead concentration.

4.2.2 Photographs

Representative photographs of building materials greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 and where in other than intact condition (e.g. fair, peeling, cracking) are provided in Appendix D of this report.

4.2.3 CADD Drawings

Based on the results of the lead screening survey, a table of LCP components identified with > 0.1 mg/cm2 lead content was developed. This table is presented on the CADD drawings for use by the VAMC for exposure assessments and preliminary renovation planning. Based on the results of the survey, these components identified in the CADD table and on the plan should be assumed to be LCP unless otherwise determined.

5.0 LIMITATIONS

This survey report is the result of a diligent search of the building for ACM and LCP. Only accessible areas were included in this survey. Although a comprehensive inspection was performed, M&A does not claim to have identified all of the ACM and LCP that could be present in the facility (for example, materials potentially located within aforementioned inaccessible areas discussed in Section 3.1). M&A’s survey was performed with limitations inherent to visual inspections. M&A has conducted this assessment with reasonable care and has performed this project within generally accepted industry standards. There can be no assurances, and M&A makes no assurances, that the information, research, and technology used to prepare this report may not change in the future, thus affecting the results reported herein.

6.0 CLOSING REMARKS

Prior to initiating plans for maintenance, renovation or demolition activities, the VAMC should review the asbestos and lead survey results to determine whether any of the materials identified as ACM or LCP will be disturbed by proposed work activities.

6.1 Asbestos

The purpose of the ACM survey was to identify ACM in the building within the limitations of the survey for worker protection purposes and future renovation or demolition planning purposes. In regards to asbestos, any suspect material encountered during renovation/demolition that is not identified in this report as being non-ACM should be assumed to be ACM unless laboratory analytical data for bulk samples prove otherwise. Suspect ACM that may be present within the walls, above inaccessible hard ceilings, or in other inaccessible locations, and that accordingly was not inspected should be assumed to contain asbestos if discovered until otherwise verified, as previously described. If ACM must be disturbed, the ACM must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor and be performed in accordance with applicable regulations. If proposed work activities will not disturb intact ACM, continuous monitoring of ACM should be conducted throughout work activities to ensure the ACM remains in an intact condition.

Additionally, prior to commencing work activities, personnel involved with the work activities should be made aware of the location of ACM, within the building in which they will be working. Additional information regarding asbestos management and the Operations & Maintenance (O&M) program is outlined in the VAMC campus wide Asbestos O&M Management Plan available in Volume I of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

6.2 Lead Containing Paint

The purpose of the LCP screening survey was to identify patterns of LCP. For the purpose of this LCP screening survey, representative interior and exterior building components were tested. The regulations addressing LCP in non-residential buildings are focused on protecting workers involved with paint disturbing activities and related waste disposal activities.

Worker protection is regulated by OSHA regulations as well as applicable state regulations. These regulations involve air monitoring of workers to determine exposure levels when disturbing paint containing measurable lead. A LCP determination cannot determine a safe level of lead, but is intended to provide guidance as to the locations of where LCP is present. VA employees and contractors may use this information to better determine exposures of workers to airborne lead by understanding the different concentrations of lead paint on representative components and surfaces. Worker exposure controls can then be implemented and air monitoring can then be performed during activities that disturb paint on representative surfaces.

A concentration of lead greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 exceeds HUD residential standards and is an indicator of risk. OSHA does not specify a safe concentration of LCP. However, for the purposes of this LCP screening survey a lead concentration greater than 0.1 mg/cm2 has been utilized as a threshold established by VISN 1 for areas where possible worker exposures may occur.

Figures

Appendix A

Table 4 Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results

Amount Units

01A Hallway Rooms B6, B007F and Corridor

9"x9" Brown Floor Tile

5% Chrysotile 830 SF Good 4

01B B6 Rooms B6, B007F and Corridor

9"x9" Brown Floor Tile

01C B6 Rooms B6, B007F and Corridor

9"x9" Brown Floor Tile

02A Hallway - 9"x9" Brown Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

02B B6 - 9"x9" Brown Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

02C B6 - 9"x9" Brown Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

03A Hallway - Carpet Mastic NAD - - - - 03B B6 - Carpet Mastic NAD - - - - 03C 123 - Carpet Mastic NAD - - - - 04A Hallway - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - - 04B B4A - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - - 04C 123 - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - -

05A Hallway - 2'x2' Textured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

05B B20 - 2'x2' Textured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

05C B20 - 2'x2' Textured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

06A Hallway Throughout Basement

Duct Mastic 8% Chrysotile 5,000 SF Damaged 3

06B B4 Throughout Basement

Duct Mastic

06C Hallway Throughout Basement

Duct Mastic

07A B4 - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

07B B20 - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

07C B007B - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

Table 4 - Summary of ACM Building Survey Results Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Stop Positive See 01A

Stop Positive See 06A

Sample No.

Sample Location

ACM

Location

Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Estimated Quantity

Stop Positive See 01A

Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

February 2011 Appendix A, Table 4 - Survey Report Bedford Building 80

Table 4 - Summary of ACM Building Survey Results Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Sample No.

Sample Location

ACM

Location

Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Estimated Quantity Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

08A B13 Rooms B13 and B20 12"x12" Tan Floor

Tile 10% Chrysotile 80 SF Good 4

08B B20 Rooms B13 and B20 12"x12" Tan Floor

Tile

08C B20 Rooms B13 and B20 12"x12" Tan Floor

Tile

09A B13 - 12"x12" Tan Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

09B B20 - 12"x12" Tan Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

09C B20 - 12"x12" Tan Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

10A B8A - Brown Sheet Flooring NAD - - - - 10B B4 - Brown Sheet Flooring NAD - - - -

10C B14 Throughout Basement

Brown Sheet Flooring

3% Chrysotile 900 SF Good 4

11A B8A - Brown Sheet Flooring

Mastic

NAD - - - -

11B B4 - Brown Sheet Flooring

Mastic

NAD - - - -

11C B14 - Brown Sheet Flooring

Mastic

NAD - - - -

12A B1 Throughout Basement

Duct Insulation 50% Chrysotile, 10% Amosite 700 SF Damaged 1

12B B1 Throughout Basement

Duct Insulation

12C B1 Throughout Basement

Duct Insulation

13A Hallway Throughout

1st Floor 12"x12" Off White

Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile 9,500 SF Good 4

13B 123 Throughout

1st Floor 12"x12" Off White

Floor Tile

13C 130 Throughout

1st Floor 12"x12" Off White

Floor Tile

14A Hallway - 12"x12" Off White Floor Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

14B 123 - 12"x12" Off White Floor Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

14C 130 - 12"x12" Off White Floor Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

Stop Positive See 08A

Stop Positive See 12A

Stop Positive See 13A

Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Sample No.

Sample Location

ACM

Location

Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Estimated Quantity Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

15A 131 - 6" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - - 15B 131 - 6" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - - 15C 131 - 6" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - -

16A Hallway - Plaster Above 1'x1'

Ceiling Tile

NAD - - - -

16B Hallway - Plaster Above 1'x1'

Ceiling Tile

NAD - - - -

16C Hallway - Plaster Above 1'x1'

Ceiling Tile

NAD - - - -

17A 131 - 1'x1' Ceiling Tile NAD - - - - 17B 118 - 1'x1' Ceiling Tile NAD - - - - 17C 132 - 1'x1' Ceiling Tile NAD - - - -

18A 131 Throughout

Building Pipe Fitting Insulation

30% Chrysotile 150 EA Damaged 2

18B 131 Throughout

Building Pipe Fitting Insulation

18C 109 Throughout

Building Pipe Fitting Insulation

19 122 Kitchen Black Sink

Undercoating 3% Chrysotile 1 EA Good 4

20A 102 Room 102 -

Office 12"x12" Gray Floor

Tile 2% Chrysotile 150 SF Good 4

20B 102 Room 102 -

Office 12"x12" Gray Floor

Tile

20C 102 Room 102 -

Office 12"x12" Gray Floor

Tile

21A 102 - 12"x12" Gray Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

21B 102 - 12"x12" Gray Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

21C 102 - 12"x12" Gray Floor

Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

22A B1B - 12"x12" Beige

Speckled Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

22B B1B - 12"x12" Beige

Speckled Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

22C B1B - 12"x12" Beige

Speckled Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

Stop Positive See 18A

Stop Positive See 20A

Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Sample No.

Sample Location

ACM

Location

Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Estimated Quantity Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

23A B1B Room B1B - Bathroom

12"x12" Beige Speckled Floor Tile

Mastic 2% Chrysotile 45 SF Good 4

23B B1B Room B1B - Bathroom

12"x12" Beige Speckled Floor Tile

Mastic

23C B1B Room B1B - Bathroom

12"x12" Beige Speckled Floor Tile

Mastic

24A B003 - Spray Applied Fireproofing

NAD - - - -

24B B003 - Spray Applied Fireproofing

NAD - - - -

24C B003 - Spray Applied Fireproofing

NAD - - - -

25A B002 - Tank Insulation NAD - - - - 25B B002 - Tank Insulation NAD - - - - 25C B002 - Tank Insulation NAD - - - - 26A Hallway - Drywall NAD - - - - 26B Hallway - Drywall NAD - - - - 26C Hallway - Drywall NAD - - - - 27A Hallway - Joint Compound NAD - - - - 27B Hallway - Joint Compound NAD - - - - 27C Hallway - Joint Compound NAD - - - -

28A B1A Room B1A - Bathroom

Residual Black Mastic

3% Chrysotile 65 SF Good 4

28B B1A Room B1A - Bathroom

Residual Black Mastic

28C B1A Room B1A - Bathroom

Residual Black Mastic

29A Exterior Exterior Window Glazing 2% Chrysotile 1,025 LF Damaged 3

29B Exterior Exterior Window Glazing

29C Exterior Exterior Window Glazing

30A Exterior Exterior Window Caulking 3% Chrysotile 840 LF Damaged 3

30B Exterior Exterior Window Caulking

30C Exterior Exterior Window Caulking

31A Exterior Exterior Door Caulking 5% Chrysotile 250 LF Damaged 3

31B Exterior Exterior Door Caulking

31C Exterior Exterior Door Caulking

Stop Positive See 30A

Stop Positive See 23A

Stop Positive See 28A

Stop Positive See 29A

Stop Positive See 30A

Stop Positive See 31A

Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Sample No.

Sample Location

ACM

Location

Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Estimated Quantity Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

32A Exterior - Residual Overhead

Door Caulking

NAD - - - -

32B Exterior - Residual Overhead

Door Caulking

NAD - - - -

32C Exterior - Residual Overhead

Door Caulking

NAD - - - -

33A Exterior - A/C Caulking NAD - - - - 33B Exterior - A/C Caulking NAD - - - - 33C Exterior - A/C Caulking NAD - - - -

34A Exterior Exterior Expansion Joint

Caulking 5% Chrysotile 30 LF Damaged 3

34B Exterior Exterior Expansion Joint

Caulking

34C Exterior Exterior Expansion Joint

Caulking

1 - Analyzed by TEM TR - Trace SF - Square Feet LF - Linear Feet EA - Each CF - Cubic Feet

NAD - No Asbestos Detected (PLM) ND - None Detected (TEM)

* - The VISN 1 hazard assessment scale 1 – 4 is a relative indicator of the risk and need for response/remediation. (1) represents the highest priority (e.g. removal or encapsulation) whereas a (4) represents the lowest priority (monitor as part of 6 month O&M program). The rating, assigned by an Asbestos Management Planner, takes into account the following criteria:

condition, friable vs. non-friable, accessibility, occupancy (e.g. continuous, intermittent or occasional, patients/staff/visitors), potential for air erosion, potential for vibration damage, potential for disturbance/damage (e.g. exposed and in an accessible location), and potential for water damage.

Footnotes:

Stop Positive See 34A

Appendix B

Table 5 Summary of XRF Measurements

2919 First 121 Block Wall (Exterior) East Intact White 0 2920 First 121 Block Column East Intact White 0 2921 First 121 Metal Window Casing East Intact White 0.14 2922 First 121 Metal Swinging Screen East Intact White 0 2923 First 121 Metal Door West Intact Gray 0 2924 First 121 Metal Door Casing West Intact Gray 0 2925 First Corridor Metal Door Casing West Intact Gray 0 2926 First Corridor Metal Door West Intact Gray 0 2927 First Corridor Metal Lintel West Intact Gray 0 2928 First Corridor Metal Lintel West Intact White 0 2929 First Corridor Metal Door West Intact Gray 0 2930 First Corridor Metal Door Casing West Intact Gray 0 2931 First Corridor Metal Window Casing West Intact White 0 2932 First Corridor Metal Swinging Screen West Intact White 0 2933 First Corridor Block Wall (Exterior) West Intact White 0 2934 First Corridor Block Column West Intact White 0 2935 First 104 Block Column East Intact Beige 0 2936 First 104 Block Wall (Exterior) East Intact Beige 0 2937 First 104 Metal Window Casing East Intact Beige 0 2938 First 104 Metal Swinging Screen East Intact Beige 0 2939 First 104 Wood Door Casing South Intact Gray 0 2940 First Stairwell Metal Door Casing South Intact Gray 0 2941 First Stairwell Metal Door South Intact Gray 0 2942 First Stairwell Concrete Floor North Intact Gray 0 2943 First Stairwell Metal Handrail North Intact White 4.9 2944 First Stairwell Concrete Tread West Intact Gray 0 2945 First Stairwell Metal Riser West Intact Gray 3.6 2946 First Stairwell Metal Stringer North Intact White 8.7 2947 Basement B6 Block Wall (Exterior) South Intact Beige 0 2948 Basement B6 Block Wall (Interior) East Intact Beige 0 2949 Basement B6 Block Column South Intact Beige 0 2950 Basement B6 Metal Swinging Screen South Intact Beige 0 2951 Basement B6 Metal Door Casing South Intact Beige 0 2952 Basement B6 Metal Door Casing North Intact Gray 0 2953 Basement B6 Wood Door North Intact Gray 0 2954 Basement Exterior Metal Door West Intact Red 0 2955 Basement Exterior Metal Door Casing West Intact Beige 0 2956 Basement Exterior Metal Lintel West Intact Beige 0 2957 Basement Exterior Metal Window Casing West Intact Beige 0.22 2958 Basement Exterior Metal Window Sash West Intact Beige 0 2959 Basement Exterior Metal Window Sill West Intact Beige 0 2960 Basement Exterior Wood Door West Intact Red 3.4 2961 Basement Exterior Wood Door Casing West Intact Beige 0.6 2962 Basement Exterior Metal Lintel West Intact Beige 6.6 2963 Basement Exterior Concrete Tread West Intact Yellow 0.06 2964 Basement Exterior Metal Threshold West Intact Gray 0 2965 Basement Exterior Metal Corner Guard West Intact Yellow 6.4 2966 Basement Exterior Metal Window Casing North Intact Beige 0.21 2967 Basement Exterior Metal Window Sash North Intact Beige 0.4 2968 Basement Exterior Metal Window Sill North Intact Beige 0.4

Table 5 - Summary of XRF Measurements Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 80

Color Results

(mg/cm2) Reading

No.

Floor Location

Substrate and Component

Side Condition

Appendix B, Table 5 - Survey Report Bedford Building 80

Table 5 - Summary of XRF Measurements

Color Results

(mg/cm2) Reading

No.

Floor Location

Substrate and Component

Side Condition

2969 Basement Exterior Metal Lintel North Intact Beige 6.4 2970 Basement Exterior Metal Window Casing East Intact Beige 0.3 2971 Basement Exterior Metal Window Sash East Intact Beige 0.5 2972 Basement Exterior Metal Window Sill East Intact Beige 0.3 2973 First Exterior Metal Dock Edge South Intact Yellow 9.3 2974 First Exterior Metal Handrail South Intact Brown 4.6 2975 First Exterior Metal Lamp Post 80-3 South Intact Green 0 2976 First Exterior Metal Guard Rail South Intact Yellow 2.4 3007 Basement B1 Concrete Wall (Exterior) West Intact White 0 3008 Basement B1 Concrete Floor West Poor Gray 0 3009 Basement B1 Metal Handrail Right Intact Brown 0 3010 Basement B1 Metal Stringer West Intact Brown 0 3011 Basement B1 Metal Riser South Fair Gray 0 3012 Basement B1 Concrete Column West Intact White 0 3013 Basement B1 Concrete Ceiling West Intact White 0 3014 Basement B1 Wood Door North Intact White 0 3015 Basement B1 Wood Door Casing North Intact Gray 0 3016 Basement B1 Block Wall (Interior) North Intact White 0 3017 Basement B2 Concrete Wall (Interior) East Intact White 0 3018 Basement B2 Metal Ladder East Intact Yellow 0 3019 Basement B2 Wood Door Casing West Intact White 0 3020 Basement B2 Metal Door West Intact White 0

Black - Blue - Red - Greater than 1.0 mg/cm2

Font Color Annotation

Below the VISN1 Threshold of 0.1 mg/cm2

Above the VISN1 Threshold of 0.1 mg/cm2, but less than 1.0 mg/cm2

Appendix B, Table 5 - Survey Report Bedford Building 80

Appendix C

Representative Photographs of ACM

9”x9” Brown Floor Tile Sample 01A

Duct Mastic Sample 06A

12”x12” Tan Floor Tile Sample 08A

Brown Sheet Flooring Sample 10C

Duct Insulation Sample 12A

12”x12” Off White Floor Tile Sample 13A

Pipe Fitting Insulation Sample 18A

Black Sink Undercoating Sample 19

12”x12” Gray Floor Tile Sample 20A

12”x12” Beige Speckled Floor Tile Mastic Samples 23A

Residual Black Mastic Sample 28A

Window Glazing Sample 29A

Window Caulking Sample 30A

Door Caulking Sample 31A

Expansion Joint Caulking Sample 34A

Pipe Insulation Identified in Previous Survey Confirmed

Appendix D

Representative Photographs of Non-Intact Lead Containing Paint, Greater than 1.0 mg/cm2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Mar 29, 2023.