Attachment 8 asbestos lead Survey Report Bedford Bldg 62_2-15-11 Final.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted Mar 29, 2023

Attached to: C1DA--518-22-101 ADA-Barrier Free Restrooms - Phase I AE Design
Solicitation number: 36C24123R0110
Issued by: Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 1

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
36C24123R0110.docx	DOCX document	Mar 29, 2023
Attachments 10-14 - Drawings.pdf	PDF	Mar 29, 2023
SOW 518-22-101 Barrier Free Restrooms wo attachments.pdf	PDF	Mar 29, 2023
Attachment 9 asbestos lead Survey Report Bedford Bldg 80_2-15-11 Final.pdf	PDF	Mar 29, 2023

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

VOLUME II

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL &

LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

SURVEY REPORT

BUILDING 62

VISN 1

Bedford VA Medical Center

200 Springs Road Bedford, Massachusetts

Project No. 2009023.008

February 15, 2011

5 Alfred Circle Bedford, MA 01730-2318

Telephone: (781) 275-6050 Toll Free: (800) 877-6050 Facsimile: (781) 275-5651 info@mabbett.com www.mabbett.com

VHABEDSanfoM Text Box Attachment 8

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead Containing Paint (LCP) Building Survey Report was prepared for the Veterans Affairs (VA) New England Healthcare System (VISN 1) in accordance with an established scope of work as defined in Contract Number VA241-P-1653. The information presented herein is based on the facts and information conveyed to or received by Mabbett & Associates, Inc. (M&A) during the preparation of this report. If any of the information provided to M&A that was used in preparing this report is incorrect, incomplete, or subject to change, M&A would wish to alter its opinion(s) accordingly. In addition, the professional opinions and information contained in this report are based solely on the requirements of the applicable regulations and technical data as known to M&A as of the date of this report and considered applicable to this report.

This individual building report within Volume II, which contains building specific lead and asbestos findings, is part of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report consisting of the following volumes:

Volume I - General

Chapter 1 - Introduction and Executive Summary Chapter 2 - Asbestos Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Plan Chapter 3 - Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Survey Tables Chapter 4 - Lead Containing Paint Survey Tables

Volume II – Individual Building Reports

Individual Building Reports Chapters including:

Cover page with building number Building narrative summary Floor plans Relevant asbestos findings for the building Relevant lead containing paint findings for the building Relevant photos

Volume III – Appendices and Supporting Data

Appendix A - Asbestos Laboratory Analysis Reports and Laboratory Certifications Appendix B - Inspector Field Data Sheets/Chains-of-Custody Appendix C - Personnel Certifications & Licenses Appendix D - XRF Performance Characteristics/Calibration Records Appendix E - Lead Laboratory Analysis Reports and Laboratory Certifications (If Applicable)

Volume IV – HUD Residential LBP Reports (If Applicable)

This report was prepared by the following Mabbett & Associates, Inc. personnel:

Michael F. Delaney Project Manager Massachusetts Asbestos Inspector AI031436 Massachusetts Management Planner AP000048

This report has been reviewed and approved by:

MABBETT & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Robert K. McKinley, MPH, CIH, LIH Director of Industrial Hygiene Services Massachusetts Asbestos Inspector AI000314

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Description Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Sampling Methodology

3.2 Analytical Methodology

3.3 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Findings

4.0 LEAD SCREENING SURVEY

4.1 Screening Survey Methodology

4.2 Summary of Lead Screening Survey Findings

5.0 LIMITATIONS

6.0 CLOSING REMARKS

6.1 Asbestos

6.2 Lead Containing Paint

Tables Table 1 – Specific Inaccessible Areas Table 2 – Summary of Positive ACM Samples Table 3 – Summary of XRF Measurements Above VISN 1 Threshold of >0.1 mg/cm2 Table 4 – Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results...... Appendix A Table 5 – Summary of XRF Measurements............................................................... Appendix B

Figures Figure 1 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 62, Basement Figure 2 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 62, Floor 1 Figure 3 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 62, Floor 2 Figure 4 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 62, Attic Figure 5 – Lead Survey Summary Plan - Building 62, Basement Figure 6 – Lead Survey Summary Plan - Building 62, Floor 1 Figure 7 – Lead Survey Summary Plan - Building 62, Floor 2 Figure 8 – Lead Survey Summary Plan - Building 62, Attic

Appendices Appendix A – Table 4, Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results Appendix B – Table 5, Summary of XRF Measurements Appendix C – Representative Photographs of ACM Appendix D – Representative Photographs of Non-Intact Lead Containing Paint

1.0 INTRODUCTION & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Mabbett and Associates, Inc. (M&A), with Covino Environmental Associates, Inc. (Covino) as sub-contractors, performed surveys for suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACM) and screenings of suspect lead containing paint (LCP) surfaces utilizing an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzer. Surveys were performed of selected buildings at the VA Medical Center (VAMC) located at 200 Springs Road, Bedford, MA, under Contract VA241-P-1653. A complete list of buildings surveyed is in Volume I of this report. Site survey work was performed in July, 2010, by appropriately credentialed personnel as required. Collected suspect ACM samples were submitted to a certified analytical laboratory for asbestos analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) using positive stop methodology and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) where indicated. When necessary, paint chip samples were collected and submitted to a certified analytical laboratory for lead content analysis using atomic absorption spectroscopy. The survey effort involved the collection or screening of the following samples, resulting in the following conclusions:

136 bulk samples for suspect ACM were collected in this building.

Based on laboratory analysis of suspect ACM, 16 of the collected samples contained asbestos greater than or equal to 1%.

97 XRF analyzer screening measurements of building surfaces were taken in this building.

Based on XRF screening measurements, 31 of the XRF measurements revealed concentrations of lead in paint that exceeded 0.1 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2).

This building report consists of a summary of findings, floor plans that indicate positive sample locations, detailed analytical findings for the specific surveyed building materials, and photos of identified ACM and LCP, greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 and in an other than intact condition.

Laboratory certificates of analysis and field data sheets for this building report are available in Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

According to information provided by the VAMC Office of Facilities Management and observations made by the M&A team at the time of the survey, Building 62 was a four-story Patient Care building built in 1939 and occupied approximately 46,968 square feet.

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Sampling Methodology

A visual screening inspection was conducted to identify locations of suspect ACM throughout the building by state licensed asbestos inspectors. Only areas that were accessible during the field work phase were inspected. Every effort was made during the initial field survey work to access areas as necessary to complete the survey; however, areas that remained inaccessible to the survey team are indicated in Table 1 below.

Table 1 – Specific Inaccessible Areas

Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 62

Building Floor Room

No.

Reason Area Was Inaccessible and Survey

Impacts, If Applicable

There were no inaccessible areas identified during this survey.

Other general areas that were inaccessible or where the survey was limited to visual observation only are identified below:

• Within walls • Within fire doors

• Enclosed pipe/duct chases • Inside mechanical equipment/ductwork

• Above fixed drywall or plaster ceilings

Due to these access restrictions, ACM surveys should be performed prior to any proposed renovations or maintenance involving inaccessible areas.

Bulk samples were collected of suspect ACM in accordance with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and VISN 1 approved M&A VISN 1 Survey Program Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Roofing materials were not sampled unless otherwise indicated in order to maintain applicable warranties. Bulk suspect ACM sampling was conducted according to the following sampling plan:

(a) Surfacing material:

(1) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is 1,000 ft2 or less.

(2) At least five bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 ft2 but less than or equal to 5,000 ft2.

(3) At least seven bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 5,000 ft2.

(b) Thermal system insulation:

(1) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area of thermal system insulation.

(2) At least one bulk sample shall be collected from each homogeneous area of patched area of thermal system insulation.

(3) Sufficient samples shall be collected from elbows and fittings to determine if it contains

ACM.

(4) Bulk samples shall not be collected from any homogeneous area where the state licensed asbestos inspector determined that the thermal system insulation is fiberglass, foam glass, rubber, or other non-ACM.

(1) At least one bulk sample shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is less than 100 ft2.

(2) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 100 ft2.

3.2 Analytical Methodology

The collected bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody procedures to ProScience Analytical Services, Inc. (ProScience) of Woburn, MA for polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis of bulk materials using EPA Method 600/R-93/116. When required, sample results that revealed trace concentrations (greater than 0% but less than or equal to 1%) of asbestos by PLM were analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. ProScience is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Lab Code 200090-0). Duplicate bulk samples were submitted for PLM analysis to Covino. Covino is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Lab Code 101781-0). A summary table containing the duplicate bulk sample results is provided in Volume I, Chapter 1, Table 4. Copies of the laboratory accreditations are included in Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

All bulk sample results are summarized in Table 4 – Summary of ACM Building Survey Results.

The EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Occupational Safety (DOS) defines any material that contains greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos as being an ACM. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) defines any material that contains equal to or greater than one percent (≥1%) asbestos as being an ACM. As such, the analytical laboratory identified bulk samples as positive for asbestos that met the regulatory criteria of equal to or greater than one percent (≥1%) asbestos.

3.3 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Findings

3.3.1 Data Tables, Laboratory Results, and Field Notes

Collected bulk samples confirmed by the analytical laboratory to contain ≥1% asbestos are listed in Table 2 - Summary of Positive ACM Samples. Samples analyzed by PLM containing trace levels of asbestos, defined as greater than 0% but less than 1%, are listed in Table 4 with the TEM analysis results. Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report includes copies of the laboratory certificates of analysis (including duplicate samples) and Inspector Data Sheets.

Table 2 - Summary of Positive ACM Samples

Estimated Quantity Sample

No.

Sample

Location

ACM

Location Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Amount Units

Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

02A B17 02B 232

02C 131

Throughout Building

12'x12" White With Black Fleck Floor Tile

Mastic

2% Chrysotile 21,000 SF Good 4

04A 04B

04C B17 Room B17

- Office

12"x12" White With Gray Fleck Floor Tile

Mastic

5% Chrysotile 270 SF Good 4

06A B17 06B B33B 06C 219

Rooms B17, B33B, Gray Sink Undercoating 10% Chrysotile 3 EA Good 4

12A B22 12B 201B

12C 150

Throughout Building

12"x12" Tan With Brown

Streaks Floor Tile

2% Chrysotile 4,000 SF Good 4

13A B22 13B 201B

13C 150

Throughout Building

12"x12" Tan With Brown

Streaks Floor Tile Mastic

2% Chrysotile 4,000 SF Good 4

16A 16B 16C

B23 Room B23

- Boiler Room

White Duct Mastic 3% Chrysotile 100 LF Good 4

28A 238 28B Attic 28C Attic

Throughout Building

Tan Duct Mastic 5% Chrysotile 11,000 SF Good 4

31A 31B

31C

132 Room 132

- Closet

12"x12" Tan With Brown Fleck Floor Tile Mastic

5% Chrysotile 50 SF Good 4

32A 32B

32C

144 Room 144

- Closet

9"x9" Tan With Brown

Streaks Floor Tile

3% Chrysotile 50 SF Good 4

33A 33B

33C

144 Room 144

- Closet

9"x9" Tan With Brown

Streaks Floor Tile Mastic

5% Chrysotile 50 SF Good 4

36A 36B 36C

Exterior Attic Windows

Window Glazing 3% Chrysotile 80 LF Good 4

37A 37B 37C

Attic Attic Stick Pin Adhesive 10% Chrysotile 100 SF Good 4

Table 2 - Summary of Positive ACM Samples Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 62

Estimated Quantity Sample

No.

Sample

Location

ACM

Location Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Amount Units

Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

38A 38B 38C

Exterior Basement Windows

Black Window Caulking

5% Chrysotile 3,100 LF Good 4

40A 40B 40C

Exterior Exterior White Door Caulking 5% Chrysotile 200 LF Good 4

42A 42B 42C

Exterior Exterior Vent Caulking 3% Chrysotile 40 LF Good 4

43A 43B 43C

Exterior Exterior White Brick Caulking 5% Chrysotile 200 LF Good 4

Footnotes: SF - Square Feet 1 - Analyzed by TEM LF - Linear Feet EA - Each CF - Cubic Feet

* The VISN 1 risk hazard assessment scale 1 – 4 is a relative indicator of the risk and need for response/remediation. (1) represents the highest priority (e.g. removal or encapsulation) whereas a (4) represents the lowest priority (monitor as part of 6 month O&M program). The rating assigned by an Asbestos Management Planner, takes into account: condition, friable vs. non-friable, accessibility, occupancy (e.g. continuous, intermittent or occasional and patients/staff/visitors), potential for air erosion, potential for vibration damage, potential for disturbance/damage (e.g. exposed and in an accessible location), and potential for water damage.

3.3.2 Photographs

Representative photographs of identified ACM are provided in Appendix C of this report.

3.3.3 CADD Drawings

The location of each collected bulk sample and its abridged sample ID is shown on the CADD drawings in the Figures Section of this report. The sample ID on the drawings has been abridged (by excluding the individual room number from the full sample ID) for aesthetic purposes. Each positive ACM sample location is colored red and marked with an asterisk (*), while stop positives are marked with two asterisks (**). Collected bulk samples that were not positive are identified solely by the abridged sample ID. Building areas containing ACM have been indicated with hatching to identify the location of the identified ACM.

4.0 LEAD SCREENING SURVEY

4.1 Screening Survey Methodology

M&A completed a Lead Containing Paint Risk Analysis in accordance with the SOP and determined that a LCP screening survey was warranted in this building. The LCP screening survey was performed by trained lead inspectors/screeners meeting the qualifications outlined in the SOP. The screening survey measured lead concentrations in accessible building surfaces by using a Niton XLp 303A XRF (serial number 18580). The XRF instrument was calibrated at the frequency specified in the SOP.

4.2 Summary of Lead Screening Survey Findings

4.2.1 Data Tables

As specified by VISN 1, a description of XRF-screened painted interior and exterior building components containing lead at concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/cm2 have been included in Table 3 below:

Table 3 - Summary of Positive XRF Measurements

Reading No.

Floor Location Substrate and Component

Side Condition Color Results

(mg/cm2)

930 Attic Main Wood Window Casing East Intact Gray 9

931 Attic Main Wood Window Sash East Intact Gray 7.3

932 Attic Main Metal Column East Intact Beige 6.7

938 Attic Elev Machine Metal Handrail West Intact Yellow 0.18

940 Attic Elev Machine Metal Door South Intact Brown 0.5

942 Attic Elev Machine Metal Tread South Intact Gray 0.5

945 Attic Stairwell Metal Stringer South Intact White 0.4 949 Attic Stairwell Metal Newel Post West Intact White 0.5 950 Attic Stairwell Wood Door West Intact Brown 0.7

954 Second 206-207 Metal Radiator Guard North Intact White 3.8

958 Second 219 Metal Radiator Guard North Intact White 5.3

973 Second Stairwell Metal Handrail West Intact White 0.4 974 Second Stairwell Metal Riser South Intact White 0.6 976 Second Stairwell Metal Newel Post East Intact White 0.7 977 Second Stairwell Metal Cage East Intact White 2.9 981 First 141 Concrete Column South Intact White 0.6

982 First 141 Metal Radiator Guard South Intact White 7.4

Table 3 - Summary of Positive XRF Measurements Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 62

Reading No.

Floor Location Substrate and Component

Side Condition Color Results

(mg/cm2)

989 First 124-125 Plaster Wall (Exterior) West Intact Beige 1

990 First 124-125 Wood Door Casing West Intact White 7.9

991 First 124-125 Metal Radiator Guard West Intact White 7.7

998 First 119 Metal Radiator Guard South Intact Green 3

1015 Basement Corridor Plaster Wall (Interior) West Intact White 0.21

1016 Basement Corridor Wood Door West Intact Gray 0.6

1017 Basement Corridor Metal Door Casing West Intact Gray 1.6

1020 Basement Exterior Wood Door Casing East Intact Gray 16.8

1021 Basement Exterior Metal Lintel South Intact Gray 14.9

1023 Basement Exterior Concrete Tread South Fair Yellow 2

1026 Basement Exterior Metal Lintel North Intact Beige 21.6

1027 First Exterior Metal Handrail East Intact Brown 3 1028 First Exterior Wood Door Casing East Intact Beige 10.9

1033 Basement Exterior Metal Window Casing West Intact Beige 14.5

In addition, XRF measurements collected during the screening survey of interior and exterior building components are included in Table 5 – Summary of XRF Measurements. Table 5 includes a description of each screened surface and resulting XRF-measured lead concentration.

4.2.2 Photographs

Representative photographs of building materials greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 and where in other than intact condition (e.g. fair, peeling, cracking) are provided in Appendix D of this report.

4.2.3 CADD Drawings

Based on the results of the lead screening survey, a table of LCP components identified with > 0.1 mg/cm2 lead content was developed. This table is presented on the CADD drawings for use by the VAMC for exposure assessments and preliminary renovation planning. Based on the results of the survey, these components identified in the CADD table and on the plan should be assumed to be LCP unless otherwise determined.

5.0 LIMITATIONS

This survey report is the result of a diligent search of the building for ACM and LCP. Only accessible areas were included in this survey. Although a comprehensive inspection was performed, M&A does not claim to have identified all of the ACM and LCP that could be present in the facility (for example, materials potentially located within aforementioned inaccessible areas discussed in Section 3.1). M&A’s survey was performed with limitations inherent to visual inspections. M&A has conducted this assessment with reasonable care and has performed this project within generally accepted industry standards. There can be no assurances, and M&A makes no assurances, that the information, research, and technology used to prepare this report may not change in the future, thus affecting the results reported herein.

6.0 CLOSING REMARKS

Prior to initiating plans for maintenance, renovation or demolition activities, the VAMC should review the asbestos and lead survey results to determine whether any of the materials identified as ACM or LCP will be disturbed by proposed work activities.

6.1 Asbestos

The purpose of the ACM survey was to identify ACM in the building within the limitations of the survey for worker protection purposes and future renovation or demolition planning purposes. In regards to asbestos, any suspect material encountered during renovation/demolition that is not identified in this report as being non-ACM should be assumed to be ACM unless laboratory analytical data for bulk samples prove otherwise. Suspect ACM that may be present within the walls, above inaccessible hard ceilings, or in other inaccessible locations, and that accordingly was not inspected should be assumed to contain asbestos if discovered until otherwise verified, as previously described. If ACM must be disturbed, the ACM must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor and be performed in accordance with applicable regulations. If proposed work activities will not disturb intact ACM, continuous monitoring of ACM should be conducted throughout work activities to ensure the ACM remains in an intact condition.

Additionally, prior to commencing work activities, personnel involved with the work activities should be made aware of the location of ACM, within the building in which they will be working. Additional information regarding asbestos management and the Operations & Maintenance (O&M) program is outlined in the VAMC campus wide Asbestos O&M Management Plan available in Volume I of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

6.2 Lead Containing Paint

The purpose of the LCP screening survey was to identify patterns of LCP. For the purpose of this LCP screening survey, representative interior and exterior building components were tested. The regulations addressing LCP in non-residential buildings are focused on protecting workers involved with paint disturbing activities and related waste disposal activities.

Worker protection is regulated by OSHA regulations as well as applicable state regulations. These regulations involve air monitoring of workers to determine exposure levels when disturbing paint containing measurable lead. A LCP determination cannot determine a safe level of lead, but is

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 9 of 9 Survey Report Bedford Building 62_2-15-11 FINAL.doc intended to provide guidance as to the locations of where LCP is present. VA employees and contractors may use this information to better determine exposures of workers to airborne lead by understanding the different concentrations of lead paint on representative components and surfaces. Worker exposure controls can then be implemented and air monitoring can then be performed during activities that disturb paint on representative surfaces.

A concentration of lead greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 exceeds HUD residential standards and is an indicator of risk. OSHA does not specify a safe concentration of LCP. However, for the purposes of this LCP screening survey a lead concentration greater than 0.1 mg/cm2 has been utilized as a threshold established by VISN 1 for areas where possible worker exposures may occur.

Figures

Appendix A

Table 4 Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results

Amount Units

01A B17 - 12"x12" White With

Black Fleck Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

01B 232 - 12"x12" White With

Black Fleck Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

01C 131 - 12"x12" White With

Black Fleck Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

02A B17 Throughout

Building

12'x12" White With Black Fleck Floor

Tile Mastic 2% Chrysotile 21,000 SF Good 4

02B 232 Throughout

Building

12'x12" White With Black Fleck Floor

Tile Mastic

02C 131 Throughout

Building

12'x12" White With Black Fleck Floor

Tile Mastic

03A B17 - 12"x12" White With

Gray Fleck Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

03B B17 - 12"x12" White With

Gray Fleck Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

03C B17 - 12"x12" White With

Gray Fleck Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

04A B17 Room B17 -

Office

12"x12" White With Gray Fleck Floor

Tile Mastic 5% Chrysotile 270 SF Good 4

04B B17 Room B17 -

Office

12"x12" White With Gray Fleck Floor

Tile Mastic

04C B17 Room B17 -

Office

12"x12" White With Gray Fleck Floor

Tile Mastic

05A Hallway - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

05B Hallway - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

05C Hallway - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

06A B17 Rooms B17, B33B, 219

Gray Sink Undercoating

10% Chrysotile 3 EA Good 4

06B B33B Rooms B17, B33B, 219

Gray Sink Undercoating

06C 219 Rooms B17, B33B, 219

Gray Sink Undercoating

07A B17 - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - - 07B 223 - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - - 07C 141 - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - - 08A B16A - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - - 08B B02 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - - 08C 215 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - - 08D 238 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - -

Estimated Quantity Condition

Stop Positive See 04A

Stop Positive See 02A

Stop Positive See 06A

Table 4 - Summary of ACM Building Survey Results Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 62

Sample No.

Sample Location

ACM

Location

Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

Stop Positive See 04A

Stop Positive See 02A

Stop Positive See 06A

February 2011 Appendix A, Table 4 - Survey Report Bedford Building 62

Estimated Quantity Condition

Table 4 - Summary of ACM Building Survey Results Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 62

Sample No.

Sample Location

ACM

Location

Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4* 08E 241 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - - 08F 151 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - - 08G 136A - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - - 09A B16A - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - - 09B B02 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - - 09C 215 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - - 09D 238 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - - 09E 241 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - - 09F 151 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - - 09G 136A - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - - 10A B16A - Black Damp Proofing NAD - - - - 10B 234A - Black Damp Proofing NAD - - - - 10C 134A - Black Damp Proofing NAD - - - -

11A B08 - White Sink

Undercoating

NAD - - - -

11B 141A - White Sink

Undercoating

NAD - - - -

11C 141A - White Sink

Undercoating

NAD - - - -

12A B22 Throughout

Building