Attachment 8 Bridge Inspection Report 250729.pdf

PDF 7 MB Posted

Attached to
MOF Williams River at Tea Creek Bridge Replacement
Solicitation number
12445526B0008
Issued by

About this file

This is a routine inspection report for the Williams River Bridge (Structure Number 092104000001010), a concrete slab bridge carrying Forest Road 135 over the Williams River in West Virginia, inspected on July 29, 2025, by the U.S. Forest Service.

The bridge, built in 1950 and located near Tea Creek Campground at mile point 0.05, is rated in Fair condition (rating F) with a lowest component condition rating of 5. The 111-foot structure consists of five concrete slab spans with a 13.5-foot curb-to-curb width, carries an estimated 25 annual average daily traffic, and is posted for load (30.0-39.9 percent below HL-93 design capacity). Key deficiencies identified include widespread CS2 moderate cracking throughout all slabs, minor delamination and spalling on the deck, approximately 4 feet of scaling on abutments and piers, and a large spalled area with exposed rebar on the upstream fascia beam. The substructure rated Satisfactory (6) with no undermining detected. Critical vulnerabilities include a very high overtopping likelihood (once every two years or more frequently), scour criticality with temporary countermeasures in place, and poor approach roadway alignment. Load ratings indicate an operating rating of 0.77 and inventory rating of 0.59 under LRFR methodology. The inspection team noted the bridge is scheduled for replacement in the 2026-2027 construction season with a new, higher structure constructed upstream, followed by full demolition of the existing bridge. A safety advisory warns that large wolf spiders inhabit all pier and abutment caps.

View the file

Other files

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE NUMBER- 092104000001010 TEAM LEADER- Ben Shaffer

INSPECTION DATE- 07/29/2025 STRUCTURE CONDITION- F - Fair

ROUTINE INSPECTION REPORT

Structure Name WILLIAMS RIVER

Route Number 135

Structure Mile Point 0.05

Admin Org 092104

State 54 - West Virginia

County 75

Latitude 38.34084166666667

Longitude -80.23263333333334

Inspection Team Lead

Inspection Reviewer

Ben Shaffer, 08/21/2025

Jeff Dulka, 08/21/2025

© OpenStreetMap contributors

Location: ENTR. TEA CREEK C G

38.34084, -80.23263

MAP PAGE

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER Route Number: 135, Mile Point: 0.05

Structure Number: #092104000001010 / Routine

IDENTIFICATION

(1) State Names 54 - West Virginia

(8) Structure Number 092104000001010

(5) Inventory Route 1

(2) Highway Agency District

(3) County Code

(4) Place Code 0

(6) Features Intersected WILLIAMS RIVER

(7) Facility Carried FR 135

(9) Location ENTR. TEA CREEK C G

(11) Mile Point 0.04970968 mi

(12) Base Highway Network No

(13) LRS Inventory Rte & Subrte

(16) Latitude 38.34084166666667

(17) Longitude -80.23263333333334

(98) Border Bridge State Code

(99) Border Bridge Structure No.

(43) Main Structure Type 11 Material 1 - Concrete

Type 1 - Slab

(44) Approach Structure Type 00

Material 0 - Other Type 0 - Other

(45) No. of Spans in Main Unit 5

(46) No. of Approach Spans 0

(107) Deck Structure Type N - Not applicable

(108) Wearing Surface/Protective System

Type of Wearing Surface N - Not applicable (applies only to stru Type of Membrane 0 - None

STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL

0 - NoneType of Deck Protection

AGE AND SERVICE

(27) Year Built 1950

(106) Year Reconstructed 0

(42) Type of Service 15

On 1 - Highway Under 5 - Waterway

(28) Lane On 1

Under 0

(29) Average Daily Traffic 50

(30) Year of ADT 0

(109) Truck ADT %

(19) Bypass, Detour Length 98.176618 mi

CLASSIFICATION

(112) NBIS Bridge Length Y

(104) Highway System 0

(26) Functional Class 9 - Rural Local

(100) Defense Highway 0 - The inventory route is not

(101) Parallel Structure N - No parallel structure exis

(102) Direction of Traffic 3 - One lane bridge for 2 - way traffic

(103) Temporary Structure

(105) Federal Lands Highways 0 - N/A

(110) Designated National Network 0 - The inventory route is not

(20) Toll 3 - On free road. The structu

(21) Maintain 64 - U.S. Forest Service

(22) Owner 64 - U.S. Forest Service

(37) Historical Significance 4 - Historical significance is

GEOMETRIC DATA

(48) Length of Maximum Span 21.981628 ft

(49) Structure Length 110.89239199999999 ft

(50) Curb or Sidewalk Width

Left 0.9842519999999999 ft Right 0.9842519999999999 ft

(51) Bridge Roadway Width Curb to Curb 13.451443999999999 ft

(52) Deck Width Out to Out 15.419948 ft

(32) Approach Roadway Width (W/Shoulders) 14.107612 ft

(33) Bridge Median 0 - No median

(34) Skew 0 Deg

(35) Structure Flared 0 - No flare

(10) Inventory Route Min Vert Clear 99.99 ft

(47) Inventory Route Total Horiz Clear 99.081368 ft

(53) Min Vert Clear Over Bridge Rdwy 99.99 ft

(54) Min Vert Underclear 0 ft Ref:

(55) Min Lat Underclear RT

0 ft

0 ft Ref:

(56) Min Lat Underclear LT

NAVIGATION DATA

(40) Navigation Horizontal Clearance 0 ft(116) Vert-Lift Bridge Nav Min Vert Clear 0 ft(39) Navigation Vertical Clearance

(111) Pier Protection 0 - No navigation control on w(38) Navigation Control

0 ft

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) Design Load A - HL93

(63) Operating Rating Method 8

(64) Operating Rating

Type 8 - Load and Resistance Factor Rating (LRF Rating 0.77

(65) Inventory Rating Method 8 - Load and Resistance Factor

(66) Inventory Rating

Type Rating 0.59

(70) Bridge Posting

(41) Structure Open/Posted/Closed P - Posted for load (may inclu

1 - 30.0 - 39.9 % below

APPRAISAL

(67) Structural Evaluation 5

(68) Deck Geometry 7

(69) Clearances, Vertical/Horizontal N

(71) Waterway Adequacy 3

(72) Approach Roadway Alignment 3 (36A) Bridge Railings (36B) Transitions 0 - Inspected feature does not meet (36C) Approach Guardrail 0 - Inspected feature does not meet (36D) Approach Guardrail Ends

(113) Scour Critical Bridges 4 - Bridge foundations determined t

0 - Inspected feature does not meet

0 - Inspected feature does not meet

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

(75) Type of Work

(76) Length of Structure Improvement 0 ft

(94) Bridge Improvement Cost (Multiply value by 1000) $

(95) Roadway Improvement Cost (Multiply value by 1000) $

(96) Total Project Cost (Multiply value by 1000) $

(97) Year of Improvement Cost Estimate

(114) Future ADT 75

(115) Year of Future ADT 2045

CONDITION

(62) Culverts 6(61) Channel & Channel Protection 6(60) Substructure 5(59) Superstructure 5(58) Deck

N

INSPECTIONS *

(90) Inspection Date

(91) Frequency

(92) Critical Feature Inspection A: Fracture Critical Detail B: Underwater Inspection C: Other Special Inspection

Done Freq. (Mon) Date

* The inspection date and frequency information in this box contains the current NBI date and frequency information. Please refer to the report header for the date this inspection was conducted.

No No

07/29/2025

NBI SI&A

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

B.ID.01 Bridge Number

IDENTIFICATION

092104000001010

B.ID.02 Bridge Name WILLIAMS RIVER

B.ID.03 Previous Bridge No.

1950B.W.01 Year Built

B.L.01 State Code

B.L.02 County Code

B.L.03 Place Code

B.L.04 Highway Agency District

B.L.05 Latitude

B.L.06 Longitude

B.L.07 Border Bridge Number

B.L.08 Border Bridge State or Country Code

B.L.09 Border Bridge Insp. Resp.

B.L.10 Border Bridge Designated Lead State

B.L.11 Bridge Location

B.L.12 Metropolitan Planning Organization

LOCATION

54 - West Virginia

38.34084166666667

-80.23263333333334

N

ENTR. TEA CREEK C G

B.RH.01A Bridge Railing Type

ROADSIDE HARDWARE

B.RH.01B Bridge Railing Year (YY)

B.RH.01C Bridge Railing Test Level

B.RH.02A Transition Type

B.RH.02B Transition Year (YY)

B.RH.02C Transition Test Level

B.G.01 NBIS Bridge Length

BRIDGE GEOMETRY

B.G.02 Total Bridge Length

B.G.03 Max Span Length

B.G.04 Min Span Length

B.G.05 Bridge Width Out-to-Out

B.G.06 Bridge Width Curb-to-Curb

B.G.07 Left Curb or Sidewalk Width B.G.08 Right Curb or Sidewalk Width

B.G.09 Approach Roadway Width

15.4

13.5

14.1

B.G.14 Sidehill Bridge N - Not a sidehill bridge

B.G.15 Irregular Deck Area

1709.4B.G.16 Calculated Deck Area

B.G.10 Bridge Median

B.G.11 Skew

B.G.12 Curved Bridge

B.G.13 Max Bridge Height

0 - No median

N - Not curved

B.LR.01 Design Load

B.LR.02 Design Method

B.LR.03 Load Rating Date

B.LR.04 Load Rating Method

B.LR.05 Inventory Load RF

B.LR.06 Operating Load RF

B.LR.07 Controlling Legal Load RF

B.LR.08 Routine Permit Loads

LOADS AND LOAD RATING

HS15 - HS-15

LRFD - Load and Resistance Factor D

3/26/2020 11:00:00 AM

LRFR - Load and Resistance Factor R

0.59

0.77

1.03

Bridge does not carry routine permi

B.IR.01 NSTM Inspection Required

INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS

N - NSTM inspection not required.

B.IR.02 Fatigue Details N - No E/E’ details

B.IR.03 UW Inspection Required N - Underwater inspection not requi

N - Bridge does not have complex feB.IR.04 Complex Feature

B.C.01 Deck Condition Rating

COMPONENT CONDITION RATINGS

B.C.02 Superstructure Condition

B.C.03 Substructure Condition

B.C.04 Culvert Condition Rating

B.C.05 Bridge Railing Condition

B.C.06 Bridge Railing Transitions Condition

B.C.07 Bridge Bearings Cond.

B.C.08 Bridge Joints Condition

B.C.09 Channel Condition Rating

B.C.10 Channel Protection Condition

B.C.11 Scour Condition Rating

B.C.12 Bridge Condition Class

B.C.13 Lowest Condition Rating

B.C.14 NSTM Insp. Condition

B.C.15 UW Inspection Condition

5 - FAIR - Some moderate defec

5 - FAIR - Some moderate defec

6 - SATISFACTORY - Widespread

N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component

N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component

N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component

N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component

N - NOT APPLICABLE - Bridge do

5 - FAIR - Moderate defects; b

6 - SATISFACTORY - Widespread

6 - Widespread minor or isolat

F - Fair

5 - FAIR - Some moderate defec

N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component

N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component

B.AP.01 Appr. Roadway Alignment

APPRAISAL

B.AP.02 Overtopping Likelihood

B.AP.03 Scour Vulnerability

B.AP.04 Scour Plan of Action

B.AP.05 Seismic Vulnerability

P - Poor

6 - Very High – once every 2 years

C - Scour appraisal completed. Brid

N - A scour POA is required, but no

N - Bridge does not require seismic

B.CL.01 Owner

CLASSIFICATION

B.CL.02 Maint. Responsibility

B.CL.03 Federal or Tribal Land Access

B.CL.04 Historic Significance

B.CL.05 Toll

B.CL.06 Emergency Evacuation Designation

FL07 - U.S. Forest Service (USFS)

FL07 - U.S. Forest Service (USFS)

N - Not Applicable

7 - Historic significance of the br

N - Bridge does not carry a toll ro

N - Not an Emergency evacuation rou

SNBI SI&A

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

B.SP.02 # of Spans 5

B.SP.03 # of Beam Lines 1

CX - Concrete – otherB.SP.04 Span Material

B.SP.05 Span Continuity

B.SP.06 Span Type

B.SP.07 Span Protective System

1 - Simple or single span

S01 - Slab – solid

0 - None

B.SP.08 Deck Interaction IM - Integral or monolithic

B.SP.09 Deck Material and Type 0 - None

0 - NoneB.SP.10 Wearing Surface

B.SP.11 Deck Protective System

B.SP.12 Deck Reinforcing Protective System

B.SP.13 Deck Stay-In-Place Forms

0 - None

0 - None

0 - None

M1

SPAN SETS

B.SB.02 No. of Substructure Units 2

B.SB.03 Substructure Material C01 - Reinforced concrete – ca

A03 - Abutment – open/spill thB.SB.04 Substructure Type

B.SB.05 Substructure Protective System 0 - None

B.SB.06 Foundation Type U - Unknown

0 - NoneB.SB.07 Foundation Protective System

A1

SUBSTRUCTURE SETS

B.SB.02 No. of Substructure Units 4

B.SB.03 Substructure Material C01 - Reinforced concrete – ca

P01 - Pier – wallB.SB.04 Substructure Type

B.SB.05 Substructure Protective System 0 - None

B.SB.06 Foundation Type U - Unknown

0 - NoneB.SB.07 Foundation Protective System

P1

B.F.02 Feature Location C - Carried on bridge

B.F.03 Feature Name FR 135

7 - LocalB.H.01 Functional Classification

B.H.02 Urban Code

B.H.03 NHS Designation

B.H.04 National Highway Freight Network

99999

N - Non-NHS

N - Not on the NHFN

B.H.09 Annual ADT 25

B.H.10 Annual ADTT 5

2025B.H.11 Year of Annual ADT

B.H.12 Highway Max Usable Vertical Clearance B.H.13 Highway Min Vertical Clearance B.H.14 Highway Min Horizontal Clearance, Left

99.9

99.9

N - Not a STRAHNET routeB.H.05 STRAHNET Designation

B.H.06 LRS Route ID

B.H.07 LRS Mile Point

B.H.08 Lanes On Highway

0.05

B.H.15 Highway Min Horizontal Clearance, Right B.H.16 Highway Max Usable Surface Width

B.H.17 Bypass Detour Length

B.H.18 Crossing Bridge Number

99.9

H1

HIGHWAY FEATURES

Highway Parent B.RT.01 Route Designation

B.RT.02 Route Number B.RT.03 Route Direction B.RT.04 Route Type B.RT.05 Service Type

H1 1 135 2-T - TEMP - Two-way traffic - NS or EW 6 - Federal lands road X - Other

HIGHWAY ROUTES

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

B.F.02 Feature Location B - Below bridge

B.F.03 Feature Name WILLIAMS RIVER

N - Not navigable watersB.N.01 Navigable Waterway

B.N.02 Navigation Min Vertical Clearance

B.N.03 Movable Bridge Max Navigation Vertical Clearance

B.N.04 Navigation Channel Width

B.N.05 Navigation Channel Min Horizontal Clearance B.N.06 Substructure Navigation Protection

W1

WATERWAY FEATURES

POSTING STATUS DATA

B.PS.01 Load Posting Status B.PS.02 Posting Status Change Date

PO - Permanent - Open 08/21/2025

LOAD EVALUATION AND POSTING

B.EP.01 Legal Load Configuration B.EP.02 Legal Load Rating Factor B.EP.03 Posting Type B.EP.04 Posting Value

AASHTO Type 3 1.35

AASHTO Type 3S2 1.34

AASHTO Type 3-3 1.63

AASHTO SU6 truck 1.03

State Single Trailer 1.2

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

INSPECTION SUMMARY

Inspection Type:

Inspection Begin Date:

Inspection Completion Date:

Inspection Team Lead:

Routine

07/29/2025

07/29/2025

Ben Shaffer

A05 - WadersInspection Equipment:

Inspection Interval: 24

Latitude: 38.34084166666667

Longitude: -80.23263333333334

Region: R9, EASTERN REGION

Security ID: 0921 - MONONGAHELA NATIONAL FOREST

Inspection Team: Zoey Fox, Ben Shaffer, Leo Weese

Complex Features: N - Bridge does not have complex feature

NSTM Inspection Required: N - NSTM inspection not required.

Previous Bridge Number:

Development Status: EXISTING - ACTIVE

Structure Jurisdiction: FS - FOREST SERVICE

Inspection Responsibility: FS - FOREST SERVICE

Done By: FS - FOREST SERVICE

Fatigue Prone Details: N - No E/E’ details

Underwater Inspection Required: N - Underwater inspection not required

Bridge Condition Classification: F - Fair Lowest Condition Rating Code: 5

Inspection Remarks: Bridge to be replaced in 2026-2027 construction season. Bridge known to have large wolf spiders on all pier and abutment caps. Use caution when inspecting.

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

CONDITION & APPRAISAL DETAILS

B.C.01 Deck Condition Rating (5 - FAIR - Some moderate defects; strength and performance of the component are not affected.)

Overview:

Bridge is a slab. Per SNBI deck rates same as superstructure Structure designed to overtop

Curbing/Fascia beams:

Curbing on top broken in some areas from impact damage Upstream at span 5 large moderate spalled area with exposed rebar - this is not structural to the bridge

Topside:

Minor delamination throughout entirety of deck Small minor spalls and scaling throughout

Cleanliness:

Bridge deck clean

B.C.02 Superstructure Condition Rating (5 - FAIR - Some moderate defects; strength and performance of the component are not affected.)

Overview:

Concrete slabs have widespread moderate CS2 cracking throughout entirety Exterior fascia beams are not structural

Slabs:

CS2 cracks throughout all slabs and all spans. Most are near the pier or abutment walls. Some transverse cracks throughout at midspan.

Span 3 multiple longitudinal cracks throughout entirety as well as transverse crack throughout span 4 at pier 3 longitudinal cracking cs2

Spans:

A1 to P1 - Span 1 P1 - P4 - Spans 2,3. & 4 - this is one continuous slab but different spans P4 to A2 - Span 5 B.C.03 Substructure Condition Rating (6 - SATISFACTORY - Widespread minor or isolated moderate defects.)

Abutments:

No undermining and footers not exposed 4' high of scaling

Piers:

All piers approx. 4ft high scaling Footers not exposed and cannot poke under pier 1 span 1 side cannot fully inspect fully due to water level - area that was inspected good no undermining B.C.04 Culvert Condition Rating (N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component does not exist.)

B.C.05 Bridge Railing Condition Rating (N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component does not exist.)

Curbs do not classify as railing

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

B.C.06 Bridge Railing Transitions Condition Rating (N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component does not exist.)

B.C.07 Bridge Bearings Condition Rating (N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component does not exist.)

Bridge does not have bearings. Bridge sits directly on abutment and pier caps

B.C.08 Bridge Joints Condition Rating (N - NOT APPLICABLE - Bridge does not have deck joints.)

B.C.09 Channel Condition Rating (5 - FAIR - Moderate defects; bridge and approach roadway are not threatened.)

B.C.10 Channel Protection Condition Rating (6 - SATISFACTORY - Widespread minor or isolated moderate defects.)

B.C.11 Scour Condition Rating (6 - Widespread minor or isolated moderate scour.)

B.C.14 NSTM Inspection Condition (N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component does not exist.)

B.C.15 Underwater Inspection Condition (N - NOT APPLICABLE - Component does not exist.)

Wearing Surface Condition (NOT APPLICABLE)

No wearing surface drive directly on top of slabs

Approach Roadway Condition (GOOD)

Concrete slab approaches

B.AP.01 Approach Roadway Alignment (P - Poor)

B.AP.02 Overtopping Likelihood (6 - Very High – once every 2 years or more frequently)

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

B.AP.03 Scour Vulnerability (C - Scour appraisal completed. Bridge could become unstable for scour. Temporary (not designed) countermeasure installed to mitigate scour. Bridge is scour critical.)

B.AP.04 Scour Plan of Action (N - A scour POA is required, but not implemented.)

B.AP.05 Seismic Vulnerability (N - Bridge does not require seismic evaluation due to low anticipated ground motion or agency prioritization.)

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

STREAM CROSS SECTION

Station Remark Horizontal Distance (ft) Vertical Distance US (ft) Vertical Distance DS (ft) Abutment 1 front top of curb 2 8 9

10 10.2 10.2 21 8.6 8.9 33 7.2 5.3 43 6.8 5.5 55 7.6 6.6 65 7.1 6.8 76 7.3 6.8 87 7.8 6.4 99 7.4 6.2 109 5.5 5.3

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Distance (ft)

El ev at io n (ft

Downstream Cross Section

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Distance (ft)

El ev at io n (ft

Upstream Cross Section

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

Date Reported: 07/29/2025

Priority: High

Type of Work: Replace

Status: In-Progress

Remarks

Bridge is to be replaced with new structure upstream of existing structure will be fully demolished.

Component: Bridge

Deficiency Description

Bridge to be replaced in 2026-2027 construction season. Current bridge is designed to overtop. Replace bridge with new, higher structure.

MAINTENANCE ITEMS

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

CRITICAL FINDINGS

Critical Finding ID: FY21_USFS_CF18

Forest Specific Event Name:

CF Status: RO-Resolved

CF Inspection Date: 08/05/2021

CF Inspection Interval: 12

CF Found Date: 12/08/2020

Event Description/Cause (B4):

Load Rating

CF Criterion (B5): H - Posting recommended but not implemented (all signs not in-place or not correctly posted) (NBI Item 41 = B)

If Other (B5A):

Event Type/Cause (B12): Other - Please explain If Other (B12A): Insufficient Capacity during load rating

Deterioration (B13): Other - Please explain If Other (B13A): Insufficient design

Detailed Deficiency (B14): E - Undersized member If Other (B14A):

CF Results (B15): Other - Please explain If Other (B15A): Posting missing

Initial Actions (B17): Post Bridge

08/05/2021

Resolved Actions (B19): Bridge load rating determined no posting needed

03/26/2020

Future Actions (B20): HL-93 Bridge is being constructed by GAOA

10/27/2027

CF Remarks:

Construction package out to bid for new bridge. LR by Art Johnson determined no posting necessary. Will monitor during construction due to age of bridge.

Condition Summary: B.C.01 - 5 B.C.02 - 5 B.C.03 - 6 B.C.04 - N B.C.09 - 5 B.C.11 - 6

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

Structure Looking Upstream Structure Looking Downstream

Signs in place Approach 1

PHOTOS

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

Fr 86 Structure topside

Upstream Elevation

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

Spall facia beam 5 Upstream Curb Damage

Abutment 1 Spall downstream span 1

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

Spall downstream span 1 Exposed rebar chairs pier 1 Pier 2

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

Transverse crack span 3 mid span consistent throughout span 3 downstream at pier 2 cs2 cracking

Large Spiders on all Pier and Abutment Caps span 3 upstream side cs2 cracking

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER pier 3 - left

Structure Underside pier 3

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER pier 4 Abutment 2

Downstream Elevation

Team Lead: Ben Shaffer, Inspection Date: 07/29/2025

Bridge Name: WILLIAMS RIVER

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .