Attachment 7 - Past Performance Report Form.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NAVIFOR N4 Directorate Program’s Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0018925R0019
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Report Form for Solicitation N0018925R0019, issued by NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk, seeking comprehensive evaluation of a contractor's previous performance. The form is designed to assess the contractor's capabilities across four key areas: quality/meeting contract requirements, timeliness, responsiveness, and overall performance, with specific inquiries about customer satisfaction, problem resolution, cost control, schedule adherence, and potential for future contract awards.
The associated federal contract opportunity involves providing support services for the Naval Information Forces (NAVIFOR) N4 Directorate Programs, which include Collaboration at Sea (CAS), Combined Enterprise Regional Information Exchange System-Maritime (CENTRIXS-M), Secret Releasable (SECREL) Coalition and Allied communications, and Naval Tool for Interoperability and Risk Assessment (NTIRA). The primary objectives are to ensure seamless system integration, maintain security and compliance standards, meet performance metrics, and support scalability and future program enhancements for maritime communication and information exchange systems.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N0018925R0019 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - WD 2015-4341 Rev. 30 4.25.25.pdf | ||
| N0018925R0019 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Pricing Spreadsheet_Revised.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - Draft DD254.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Contract Discrepancy Report.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - WD 2015-4341 Rev. 29 12.23.24.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - WD 2015-5689 Rev. 24 12.23.24.pdf | ||
| N0018925R0019.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Pricing Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6 - Past Performance Information Form.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT FORM
SOLICITATION N0018925R0019
Complete and return to:
NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk Fleet Directorate Contracting Department Attn: Amy Barnes, Code 214.1 Phone: (564) 226-1893 Email: amy.m.barnes14.civ@us.navy.mil
On behalf of (Requester Information):
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |||
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |||
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |||
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |||
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |||
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | ||||
| _________________________________ | ||||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center (FLC) Norfolk to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed By:
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | |||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |||
| Address: | _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | ||||
| _________________________________ | ||||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Was the contractor required to adjust level of effort requirements based on changing customer demands throughout contract performance? If so, what turnaround times were required? How well did the contractor respond to the change requests and were they timely?
b. Describe the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?
c. Describe the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .