Attachment 7 IMOMS Sample ECP Task Order.pdf

ENGINEERING CHANGE

PROPOSAL (Instructions)

Date: ECP#:

001-23

MH-60T Cockpit Procedural Trainer (CPT) Visual Upgrade MH-60T CPT Projector Replacement and Image Generator Update

Requirements Current functionality: The current MH-60T CPT visual system consists of three existing Christie Generation 1 Matrix StIM projectors, a PC Nova 6.X image generator and a Real Image Cylindrical Screen. The MH-60T CPT has served well as a checklist and procedures trainer. Due to increased training demand the CPT has been relied upon to serve as an operational trainer which requires more fidelity in the visual system.

Desired functionality: In order to increase the trainer functionality this ECP will replace the existing projectors, image generators and screen with a system that is designed and optimized for out the window (OTW) rendering with night vision goggle stimulation capability. The visual system will be designed around the existing government furnished MH-60T CPT and FSI Dome Glass Mirror 260x60 Accuview 60 screen. It should also include a projector auto-alignment system that maximizes color matching and geometric image quality matching calibration. The image generator shall use the current Aechelon Global Database installed on all other training devices at ATC Mobile.

Reason for the change: The visual display system is the original installed on the CPT and has exceeded its’ designed service life.

Components are outdated and no longer available to facilitate a one for one replacement. New components are not compatible with old due to advancements in technology requiring replacement of the system vice individual components. Additionally, system malfunctions and repairs that interrupt training are occurring more frequently.

Impact on training, if denied: Without this projection system replacement, image quality and brightness will decrease to the point that the CPT will no longer be effective in support of pilot transition, recurrent and proficiency training objectives.

Aircraft will need to be pulled from operational service to support dramatically reduced student throughput. The economic and training benefits of the flight simulator will be lost. These include: the total net present value cost for non-simulation-based training is four times the cost of simulation-based training, simulators facilitate 2:1 student to instructor ratio that minimizes ATC staffing requirements, and more importantly, without the OFT, aircrews will be unable to practice critical safety of flight maneuvers and emergencies otherwise deemed too risky to conduct in aircraft.

References / Attachments: IMS and pricing Submitted by:

(email, ext., signature) Elmer Stone, Elmer.F.Stone@uscg.mil

Priority Low Medium High (High: Significant training or safety improvement, Med: Functional improvement that impacts training, Low: Routine capability improvement.

Platform Division Approve Disapprove Signature Date:

Comments (Optional ) FTS Division Approve Disapprove Signature Date:

Comments (Optional )

Contractor Evaluation Hardware Software TTPRR affected Yes/No TDSP affected Yes/No Logistics affected Yes/No Scope of Work

(Proposal) The scope of work of the engineering services and products will consist of the following:

Limitations:

No changes or modifications to the trainer(s) hardware or software and documents shall be made without the approval of appropriate Government authority and/or COR notice to proceed.

Costs: (i.e., N/A, In-house or identify add’l expense)

Labor: (Attach pricing data)

Material: (Attach pricing data)

Documentation: Spares: N/A

Contractors Estimated Timeline

Start Date:

Signature:

Date:

Completion Date:

Project Approval Funding Determination Analysis Summary

MX Improvement Service Life Extension

N/A OE AC&I Signature: Date:

Determination & Finding N/A D&F Required (Attach completed Determination and Finding)

FTS Division Chief Approve Disapprove Signature: Date:

Comptroller Approval (Required if > $250K expenditure) N/A Signature: Date:

COR Notice to Proceed (Gov approval for implementation) Signature: Date:

Pre-Mod Inspection N/A Completed Signature: Date:

Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Number:

Acceptance

Ready for test (Contractor) Signature: Date:

Platform SME Signature: Date:

FTS Gov’t Engineer Signature: Date:

Final Docs Accepted Signature: Date:

Final Acceptance FTS Division Chief Signature: Date:

COR Signature: Date: