Attachment 6 - QASP.pdf

36C24824Q0256

Revision 03/09/2023 Page 29 of 90

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

The contractor will be evaluated in accordance with the following:

1. PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

What will be monitored?

How will monitoring take place?

Who will conduct the monitoring?

How will monitoring efforts and results be documented?

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor through contract modification. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract.

The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO: Peter Bedard

Organization or Agency: Network Contracting Office (NCO) 8

b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR: Ronald Algieri

Organization or Agency: Orlando VA Healthcare System

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES

The following employee(s) of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager(s) for this contract.

Primary Program Manager:

Revision 03/09/2023 Page 30 of 90

Alternate Program Manager:

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

The contractor is responsible for performance of ALL terms and conditions of the contract. CORs will provide contract progress reports quarterly to the CO reflecting performance on this plan and all other aspects of the resultant contract. The performance standards outlined in this QASP shall be used to determine the level of contractor performance in the elements defined. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine the level of Contractor performance to these standards.

The Performance Requirements are listed below in Section 6. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the standard and assign a rating. At the end of the performance period, these ratings will be used, in part, to establish the past performance of the contractor on the contract.

5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

DIRECT OBSERVATION. 100% surveillance: Observation to be performed by Nursing and Surgeons. Deviations from accepted and safe practices will be reported to the COR. COR will notify CO about this issue. CO/COR will notify Contractor depending on severity of deviation by email.

6. SAMPLE QASP PERFORMANCE REPORT DATE: 11/13/2023

PWS

Referenc e

Performance Requirement Standard Accepta ble Quality Level

Surveillance Method

Met AQL/DID

NOT MEET

AQL-

CPARS

RATING/ADD

COMMENTS

1 – Provider Quality Performance

4.6.4.1 All contract provider (s) shall

perform in accordance with clinical standards

Ongoing Provider Performance Evaluation

(OPPE)

documentation for all (100%) staff providing services under the contract

_95_%

OPPE

a. Patient Care Performance b.

Medical/Clinical knowledge

c. Practiced Based Learning & Improvement

d. Interpersonal Communication Skills e.

Professionalism f-system Based Practice

2 - Qualifications of Key Personnel

2.9 All contract Autotransfusionists

shall have certification as an Autotransfusionist

All Autotransfusionist s to be certified and compliant with all certifications

100%

Random Sampling of qualification documents

3 – Scope of Practice/Privileging

4.6.4.3 Contract personnel(s) perform

within their individual scopes of practice/privileging

All (100%) contract personnel(s) perform within their scope of practice/privileges 100% of the time

100% Contract or’s personn el(s) perform within their scope of practice/ privilege s 100% of the time

Random Sampling of records

4 – Patient Access (A)

4.6.4.4 Patient must receive treatment

in a timely manner

Autotransfusionist s shall be onsite and available during all scheduled OR hours and within 30 minutes of the facility

95% Periodic Inspection

5- Patient Access (B)

4.6.4.5 Autotransfusionist shall be

available and be in location as needed to properly perform tasks as specified

Autotransfusionist s shall be onsite and available during all scheduled OR hours and within 30 minutes of the facility

Contract or’s personn el(s) are on-time and available to perform services 95% of the time

Periodic Inspection of time and attendance sheets

6. Patient Safety 4.6.4.6 Patient safety incidents shall be reported using Patient Safety Reporting System All incidents shall be reported immediately (within 24 hours)

All of patient safety incidents are reported using Patient Safety Reporting System within 24 hours of incident

95% of patient safety incidents are reported using Patient Safety Reporting System within 24 hours of incident.

Periodic

7 – Maintains licensing, registration, and certification.

4.6.4.7 Updated Licensing, registration and certification shall be provided as they are renewed Licensing and registration information shall be kept current

All licensing, registration(s), and certification(s) for contract personnel(s) shall be provided as they are renewed Licensing and registration information shall be kept current

100% licensing registrati on(s), and certificati on(s) for Contract or’s personn el(s) shall be provided as they are renewed Licensin g and registrati on informati on kept current.

No accepta ble deviatio n.

Periodic

8 – Mandatory Training, Privacy, Confidentiality and

HIPAA

4.6.4.8 Contractor personnel(s) shall

complete all required training on time per facility policy.

Contractor personnel(s) is aware of all laws, regulations, policies, and procedures relating to Privacy, Confidentiality, and HIPAA and complies with all standards Zero breaches of privacy or confidentiality.

All contractor personnel(s) shall comply with all laws, regulations, policies, and procedures relating to Privacy, Confidentiality, and HIPPA.

100% completi ons

Periodic Inspection Contractor personnel(s) shall provide evidence of annual training required by VAMC, reports violations per VA Directive 6500.6

7. CPARS RATINGS ASSIGNED TO QASP ITEMS:

Metrics and methods are designed to determine rating for a given standard and acceptable quality level. The following ratings shall be used:

EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular event could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Note: To justify Marginal performance, you should identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Report or letter).

UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters).

8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

a. The Government shall document positive and/or negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action and preparing annual past performance using CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS).

b. If contractor performance does not meet the Acceptable Quality level, the CO shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the CO shall document the discussion and place it in the contract file. When the COR and the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CR), and present it to CO. The CO will in turn review and will present to the contractor's program manager for corrective action.

The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CR in writing. The CR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the CO. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance and the acceptability of the Contractor’s corrective action plan.

Any CRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO. See Sample CDR below.

9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT

a. Frequency of Measurement. The frequency of measurement is defined in the contract or otherwise in this document. The government (COR or CO) will periodically analyze whether the frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.

b. Frequency of Performance Reporting. The COR shall communicate with the Contractor and will provide written reports to the Contracting Officer quarterly (or as outlined in the contract or COR delegation) to review Contractor performance.

10. COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP

SIGNED:

COR NAME/TITLE DATE

SIGNED:

CONTRACTOR NAME/TITLE DATE

CONTRACT REPORT

1. CONTRACT NUMBER 2. REPORT NUMBER

3. TO: (Contracting Officer) 4. FROM: (Name of COR)

5. DATES

a. CR PREPARED

b. RETURNED BY

CONTRACTOR:

c. ACTION COMPLETE

6. Issue Identified (Describe in detail. Include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)

7. SIGNATURE OF COR Date:

8. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER Date:

9a. TO (Contracting Officer) 9a. FROM (Contractor)

10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT

RECURRENCE. (Cite applicable quality control program procedures or new procedures.

Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)

11. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE Date:

12. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION.

13. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS

14. CLOSE OUT

NAME TITLE SIGNATURE DATE

CONTRACTOR

NOTIFIED

COR

CONTRACTING

OFFICER