Attachment 6- Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 319 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CNC Plasma Cutter for The Anniston Army Depot
- Solicitation number
- W911KF-24-Q-0006
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire related to solicitation W911KF-23-Q-0039 for a CNC plasma cutter. The questionnaire requests information about a contractor's past performance on a previous government contract to assess customer satisfaction, schedule adherence, technical requirements compliance, technical responsiveness, and overall performance. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and narratives for these categories using an excellence to poor scale. The questionnaire must be completed and returned by the closing date of the solicitation.
The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation W911KF-24-Q-0006 issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal to procure a CNC plasma cutter for the Anniston Army Depot. The document requests a past performance questionnaire to evaluate offerors' experience on previous relevant contracts as part of the source selection process for this opportunity.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W911KF-23-Q-0039
Past Performance Questionnaire This Questionnaire relates to solicitation requirements for
CNC Plasma Cutter
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE –
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.
Please complete this Questionnaire and submit via e-mail.
Director of Contracting Anniston Army Depot 7 Frankford Ave.
Anniston, AL 36201-4199
ATTN: Ellen Bethea, Contract Specialist E-mail: ellen.r.bethea.civ@army.mil
Desired Response Date is the closing date of this solicitation.
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
Proposed prime contractor
1. OFFEROR NAME OFFEROR ADDRESS
Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire
2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:
mailto:sara.b.young.civ@mail.mil
8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:
Company/Agency Name and Address:
Name of person completing this questionnaire:
Title:
Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:
Phone Number:
E-Mail:
Rating Scale:
EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.
GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.
ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.
MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance.
Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.
POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.
UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.
9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to Detail and Quality Assurance.
A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.
B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.
C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to contract specifications:
D. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
E. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.
Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .