Attachment 6 - Past Performance.pdf

PDF 230 KB Posted

Attached to
Western Oregon Road Construction IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
1240BH24R0015
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service R6-Pacific Northwest Region

About this file

This document is a Performance Evaluation Questionnaire for a federal contractor. It requests the evaluator to provide feedback on the contractor's performance in several key areas, including timeliness, management, quality, and overall satisfaction. The questionnaire covers the contractor's work on an IDIQ contract for services such as clearing, earthwork, drainage structures, road construction and demolition, and minor bridge work.

The evaluator is asked to rate the contractor's performance on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory and provide a rationale for the rating. The questionnaire also asks whether the evaluator would recommend the contractor for similar requirements in the future. This feedback is likely intended to be used in the evaluation of the contractor's past performance for a new federal contract opportunity, as referenced in the related solicitation information provided.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Western Oregon Road Construction IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
1240BH24R0015 - Solicitation Packet.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Sample Task Order A.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Fire Protection Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - IDIQ Vicinity Maps.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - RFP Questionnaire.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Person completing questionnaire: Phone No.:

Firm’s name: Date:

Email address:

* Contractor:

1. This new IDIQ contract is for:

Has this contractor performed any of these services for you? If yes, which ones and when was work completed?

Ratings Definitions:

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

jpaul Typewritten Text The major categories of work activities required by the contract include clearing, earthwork, structural embankments, drainage structures, pit/quarry development, road base and surfacing, road structure demolition, road structure construction (such as retaining walls and minor bridge work) and road obliteration (decommissioning). Minor bridge work for new construction includes any simple span bridge structure equal to, or less than 80’-0” span length. Bridge superstructure may be precast reinforced concrete, precast-prestressed concrete, or timber. Bridge abutments may be reinforced concrete or timber grade beams, cast-in-place reinforced concrete shallow foundation, precast concrete modular block foundation, geosynthetic reinforced soil foundation, or driven or drilled steel piling foundation with a cast-in-place concrete pile cap.

2. Timeliness of Performance/Schedule Rating (see ratings definitions on Page 1)

☐Exceptional ☐Very Good

☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal

☐Unsatisfactory

Please provide rationale for above rating, e.g., did the contractor meet the contract schedule, were they reliable and responsive to technical direction; were any liquidated damages assessed?

3. Management Rating (see ratings definitions on Page 1)

☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal

☐Unsatisfactory

Please provide rationale for above rating, e.g., how effective was the contractor’s management, did they maintain a good working relationship with the Government/project owner, did they demonstrate cooperative behavior, recommend effective solutions to problems, and show businesslike concern for Government/project owner’s interests?

4. Quality Rating (see ratings definitions on Page 1)

☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal

☐Unsatisfactory

Please provide rationale for above rating, e.g., was a quality product provided; to what extent did the contractor conform to good standards of workmanship; was deficient work identified and corrected, were any unspecified materials incorporated into the project?

5. Overall, to what extent were you satisfied with the contractor’s completed services?

☐Extremely satisfied ☐Generally satisfied

☐Generally dissatisfied ☐Extremely dissatisfied

Additional comments:

6. Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to perform in accordance with a contract’s most significant requirements, I ________________ recommend them for similar requirements in the future.

☐WOULD ☐WOULD NOT

Text1:
Text2:
Text3:
Date4_af_date:
Text5:
Text7:
Check Box8: Off
Check Box9: Off
Check Box10: Off
Check Box11: Off
Check Box12: Off
Text13:
Check Box14: Off
Check Box15: Off
Check Box16: Off
Check Box17: Off
Check Box18: Off
Text19:
Check Box20: Off
Check Box21: Off
Check Box22: Off
Check Box23: Off
Check Box24: Off
Check Box25: Off
Check Box26: Off
Check Box27: Off
Check Box28: Off
Check Box29: Off
Check Box30: Off
Text31:
Text32:
Text4:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .