Attachment 6 - HTRO Self Score Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maritime Special Operations Forces (MSOFS) 2. 0 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- H9224025R0001
- Issued by
- United States Special Operations Command
About this file
This document is an HTRO Self Score Matrix, which is an attachment to the Maritime Special Operations Forces (MSOFS) 2.0 solicitation. The matrix provides a structured format for the offeror to self-score their proposal based on specific evaluation criteria outlined in the solicitation. The criteria include metrics related to work sample size, geographic locations, position transition timelines, personnel qualifications and certifications, retention rates, security clearances, and cybersecurity requirements. The matrix defines the maximum possible points for each criterion, the points per count, and the weighted scoring factors. Offerors must complete the "Offeror's Count" column and the government reserves the right to validate and potentially downgrade the self-scored results. This self-score matrix is intended to be used in conjunction with the overall MSOFS 2.0 solicitation, which is a total small business set-aside issued by the United States Special Operations Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| H9224025R0001 Amend 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - PWS MSOFS 2.0_r1.pdf | ||
| H9224025R0001 Conf thru Amend 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - HTRO Self Score Matrix_rev1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Q_A Govt Answers_15Nov24.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A-1 CDRL A001 Submission Format.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4-QASP_MSOFS2.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A-2 CDRL A002 Submission Format.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - DD254_MSOFS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - PWS MSOFS 2.0.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Price Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 7 - Work Sample Cover Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A CDRL A001.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A CDRL A002.pdf | ||
| H9224025R0001 Final.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Q_A Template.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HTRO MSOFS 2.0
| HTRO Self Score Matrix | Citation - Section/Page # | ||||||||||||||
| Eval Section | Category / Criterion | Maximum Count | Offeror's Count | Points per Count | Weight Factor | Max Possible | Resulting Score | Down-grade | WS-1 | WS-2 | WS-3 | WS-4 | WS-5 | ||
| 5.2.1 Category 1 | Total positions on a single work sample | ||||||||||||||
| (This does not preclude an Offeror from selecting and scoring a work sample with fewer positions) | 25 | 4 | 2 | 200 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 5.2.2 Category 2 | Geographic locations | 5 | 20 | 1 | 100 | 0 | |||||||||
| 5.2.3 Category 3 | Positions transitioned within 14 days | 50 | 2 | 3 | 300 | 0 | |||||||||
| 5.2.4 Category 4 | Positions with quals/certs that meet or exceed those for: | ||||||||||||||
| Support Craft Maritime Mechanic/Tactical and Heavy Equipment Mechanic/Dive Equipment Support | 15 | 7 | 4 | 400 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 5.2.5 Category 5 | Positions with quals/certs that meet or exceed those for: | ||||||||||||||
| Intel Analyst/SSO Support/Scripter | 10 | 10 | 4 | 400 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 5.2.6 Category 6 | Positions with quals/certs that meet or exceed those for: | ||||||||||||||
| Technical Instructor/SOF Training Specialist/Tech Writer | 10 | 10 | 4 | 400 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 5.2.7 Category 7 | Retention Rate | 100 | 1 | 4 | 400 | 0 | |||||||||
| 5.2.8 Category 8 | Experience in filling positions that require | ||||||||||||||
| TS/SCI security clearances | 15 | 7 | 3 | 300 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 5.2.9 Category 9 | Safeguarding Covered Defense Information & Cyber Incident Reporting | 100 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | |||||||||
| TOTAL MAX POSSIBLE: | 2600 | ||||||||||||||
| TOTAL SELF SCORE: | 0 |
Column Definitions
| Column | Explanation |
| B | Eval Section: Points to the section in the Evaluation Criteria that corresponds to the Category/Criteria described in that row |
| C | Category/Criterion: Summarized description of the required measurment - with further detail available in the section identified in Column B |
| D | Maximum Count: The highest allowable count an Offeror can enter in Column E. These max values are selected either because a higher number is not mathematically possible (for example, retention cannot be higher than 100%), or a higher number is not relevant to the requirement (for example, it doesn't matter if your largest work sample includes MORE than 50 positions, but the government DOES want to know that your management experience includes oversight of a contracts/task order UP TO that size, comparable to the anticipated requirement, with growth) |
| E | Offeror's Count: Response provided by the Offeror for each criterion, in accordance with corresponding description and instructions in Atch 06. THIS IS THE ONLY COLUMN TO THE LEFT OF COLUMN J IN WHICH OFFERORS SHALL MAKE ENTRIES. |
| F | Points per Count: Mathematically derived by dividing the Maximum Count into 100, thus normalizing each category to a baseline of 100 for arithmetic evaluation/comparison purposes - equally weighted categories will equally impact the totals score regardless of the "unit of measure". Offerors then can achieve the maximum score for the Category/Criterion if their provided work sample(s) support(s) the maximum allowable count(s). |
| G | Weight Factor: Value designated by the Government for the purpose, as the name implies, of assigning weight to selected criteria to reflect relative importance to each category that impacts scoring totals proportionally to that weight. |
| H | Max Possible: Mathematically derived by multiplying 100 by the weight factor, and representing the maximum possible score an offeror can achieve in each category; done by achieving a validated maximum count. The sum of all values in Columns H is the "Total Max Possible" score an Offeror can achieve for technical evaluation purposes. |
| I | Resulting Score: Mathematically derived by multiplying Column E (Offeror's Count) by Column F (Points per Count), and then multiplying that product by Column G (Weight Factor). This represents the Offeror's score for each category. The sum of all values in Column I is the Offeror's "Total Self Score" for technical evaluation purposes. |
| J | Downgrade: Reserved for Governmnet Evaluator use. If the Government finds discrpencies during validation of Offeror provided counts, the Government reserves the right to downgrade scores to align with validated information. The governmnet will not upgrade scores in this process. See Atch 06 for further details pertinent to downgrading Offeror provided counts/scores. |
| K | SPARE - INTENTIONALLY BLANK |
| L-P | Citation - Section/Page # -- WS-1 thru WS-5: Space allocated to the Offeror to provide "pointers" within each of their provided work samples (WS-1 thru WS-5) to enable quick reference for the Government to find validation of Offeror's provided counts. |
ESRI_MAPINFO_SHEET
DO NOT EDIT
For Esri use only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .