Attachment_5_QASP_Matrix.pdf
PDF 407 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P1426Q0065
About this file
This is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Matrix for noxious weed survey and treatment services. The document establishes performance standards and quality metrics for contractor delivery of daily treatment records, electronic data collection, and submission activities across all treatment methods.
The QASP defines three quality rating levels tied to specific performance thresholds and corresponding payment adjustments. Rating 1 (Acceptable) requires 90% or better treatment efficacy on targeted plants, 20% or less loss of non-target species, complete and accurate treatment records submitted timely, and electronic data meeting 90% accuracy or greater. Rating 2 (Deficient) applies when treatment efficacy falls between 80-90%, triggering mandatory contractor rework at the contractor's expense; if standards are met after rework, full payment is made; if not met after a second inspection, a 20% payment reduction applies. Rating 3 (Unacceptable) results in no payment when less than 80% of quality standards are met or when treatment records and electronic data are not provided. Additional penalties include 10% payment reduction for late or incomplete submission of treatment records and electronic data. Monitoring methods include weekly review of Quality Control Plan documents by the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), periodic onsite inspections by inspectors or COR, final treatment efficacy inspections at least 14 days after completion using ocular estimates and monitoring plots as needed, and office review of all submitted documentation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Matrix
Task Sub Task Performance Standard Quality Standard for
Rating 1
Quality Standard for
Rating 2
Quality Standard for
Rating 3 Method of Monitoring
Unacceptable quality of tasks and deliverables. The services provided are not in compliance with contract terms and conditions and do not meet Quality Standards for rating 1 or 2. Negative performance rating will be assigned and no payment will be made if less than
80% of Quality Standard.
Failure to provide any treatment records and/or electronic data for treatment areas within a task order - no payment will be made.
Weekly review of Quality
Control Plan documents by
COR.
Periodic, onsite inspections during performance period by
Inspector(s) and or COR.
Final inspection for treatment efficacy and non-target kill will be determined by ocular estimate at least 14 days after completion.
Performed by Inspector(s) and/or COR. Monitoring plots will be utilized if
Quality Rating 2 or 3 are suspected.
Office review of Treatment
Records and Electronic
Data by COR.
Deficiencies in performance are found during inspections or other contractual obligations are not met.
Less than 90% but greater than 80% treatment efficacy - rework at contractors expense.
Quality Standards are achieved after rework -positive performance rating and full payment.
Failure to meet Quality
Standards (less than 90% efficacy but more than
80%) after second inspection - 20% reduction in payment (reduction will apply to treatment areas on a case by case basis if task order contains multiple treatment areas).
Failure to submit treatment records and/or electronic data by specified time, inaccurate treatment records, or less than 90% complete electronic data -
10% reduction in payment for applicable treatment areas.
Noxious Weed
Survey and
Treatment (all methods)
Daily Treatment
Record and
Electronic Data
Collection and submission
All areas within the defined area are surveyed.
Weeds will be treated within all legal specifications, as defined by the product label (dosage, environmental, etc.)
Contractor is responsible for non-target effects (discuss with COR on case by case basis).
Treatment Records meet defined requirements
Electronic data meets requirments as stated in
Performance Work
Statement and/or task order.
All areas within defined project area are surveyed
90% or better effective treatment on targeted plants (within each treatment area).
20% or less loss of non-target species.
All Treatment Records complete, accurate, and submitted within specified time period.
All electronic data meets
90% accuracy or greater and is submitted within specified time period.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .