Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire KSH.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
MICROSOFT SERVICES PREMIER SUPPORT Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
15JPSS22R00000006
Issued by
Department of Justice Offices Boards and Divisions Justice Management Division

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MICROSOFT SERVICES PREMIER SUPPORT, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 3 - Pricing Table V2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
15JPSS22R00000006 A0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Pricing Table V2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DOJ QA.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 PIB 2021-01 Personnel Security Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Whistleblower Flyer.pdf PDF
15JPSS22R00000006.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 DD254 Security Classification KSH.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Pricing Table V2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 - MS Premier Brand Name Justification Redacted.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Felony - Tax Certification.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 Non-Disclosure Agreement KSH.docx DOCX document
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFQ Instructions – Attachment 5

15JPSS22R000000XXMicrosoft Services Premier Support
Microsoft Services Premier Support15JPSS21R00000045Comment by Higa, Sakura: Update number and dates. To include the header

Past Performance Questionnaire

Name of Contractor submitting quotation: _____________________________________

Please have references complete the following questionnaire and return it, via email, to the attention of the individual named below, no later than 12:00 Noon, Washington DC time (EDT) May 7, 2021.

Fitzgerald Escalona Contracting Officer 202-532-5373 Fitzgerald.Escalona2@usdoj.gov

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTUAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print) Code Phone

Contractor Role:
|_| Prime |_| Subcontractor
Contract Type:
|_| Competitive |_| Sole Source

|_| IDIQ Task Order |_| Other |_| Fixed Price or Fixed Unit Price |_| Time & Materials or Cost Reimbursement

Work Complexity:
|_| Difficult |_| Routine
Services Area:
|_| Local |_| County

|_| State |_| National

What was the scope of work performed?

Please indicate your assessment ranging from “1 (Poor)” to “5 (Excellent)” in the boxes provided below along with a NARRATIVE EXPLANATION to support the rating (each cell will adjust for narrative comments):

Excellent (5) Very Good (4) Good (3) Marginal (2) Poor (1)

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) The contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

2. SCHEDULE

(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

3. COST CONTROL

(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS

(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(d) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues

(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues

(f) The Contractor made timely award to and demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.

5. KEY PERSONNEL

(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(b) The Contractor frequently proposed highly qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION (Please attached additional pages as necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .