Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

FINANCE AND FACILITIES DIVISION | PROCUREMENT SECTION

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Past Performance Questionnaire Version 1 October 18, 2023

To Whom It May Concern:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation intends to acquire Target Vehicles.

In order to accurately evaluate an Offerors past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying its relevant past performance history on the attached Past Performance Rating Form. Please note that the Offeror was directed to submit to you a copy of the Experience Narrative for your contract that it submitted as part of its proposal.

Upon completion of this form, please e-mail it directly to the Contracting Officer, Javia Warner, at jswarner@fbi.gov and Contract Specialist, Treyton Miller, at tmmiller3@fbi.gov.

Please make the subject line of the e-mail read 15F06726Q0000042 – Target Vehicles

– Past Performance Questionnaire – Insert Evaluated Company’s Name.”

The following standards will be used in arriving at the rating:

Outstanding The Contractor’s performance exceeded customer expectations and was technically acceptable, providing significant features or benefits.

Satisfactory The Contractor met customer expectations or contract requirements and demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the requirements.

Unsatisfactory The Contractor’s performance was either marginal or did not meet customer expectations or contract requirements.

Other If the element is not applicable, indicate with “N/A.” If no data has been obtained or additional comments are provided, please note in this column.

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT or ORDER

NUMBER:

PROJECT TITLE: Click here to enter text.

TOTAL PERIOD OF

PERFORMANCE,

INCLUDING OPTIONS

Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION

NAME: Click here to enter text.

TITLE: Click here to enter text.

AGENCY or CUSTOMER: Click here to enter text.

PHONE: Click here to enter text.

E-MAIL Click here to enter text.

DESCRIPTION OF SERIVICES PROVIDED:

For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING Adjectival Rating

Definition

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

2. SCHEDULE

the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being

3. COST CONTROL

the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being

Not Applicable

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being

6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being

Overall Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs? Why or why not?