Attachment 5 Adjectival Ratings for Evaluation.docx
DOCX document 8 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Psychological Evaluation
- Solicitation number
- OBICR202200003
- Issued by
-
The Legislative Branch
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 4 Question and Answer Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 Vendor Enrollment or Update Form 02-18.pdf | ||
| Attacchment 7 Employement Suitability Standards.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 Pricing Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| PSYCH SOLICITATION.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Conflict of interest non disclosure.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 5: Adjectival Ratings for Evaluation
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| Outstanding |
| Very comprehensive, in-depth, clear response that greatly exceeds the minimum performance or capability requirements in a way beneficial to the Government. There are no weaknesses. The Offeror’s understanding of the project and soundness of approach are such that virtually no doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the proposed effort and that consistently |
high quality performance can be expected.
| Excellent |
| Extensive, detailed response to all requirements that Exceeds the minimum performance or capability requirements in a way beneficial to the Government. There are no significant weaknesses and a minimal number of weaknesses. The Offeror’s understanding of the project and soundness of approach are such that there is great deal of certainty, that the Offeror will |
successfully perform the proposed effort and that high quality performance is likely but not assured due to weaknesses.
| Acceptable |
| The offeror has demonstrated an approach that meets the minimum performance or capability requirements. There may be minor but correctable weaknesses. The Offeror’s understanding of the project and soundness of |
approach are such that there is an average risk that this offeror would fail to meet the quantity, quality, and schedule requirements of the solicitation.
| Marginal |
| The offeror has demonstrated an approach that does not meet all of the stated performance or capability requirements. There are apparent or moderate weaknesses that are correctable. Substantial doubt exists that the Offeror will |
successfully perform the proposed effort.
| Unacceptable |
| The offeror has demonstrated an approach that fails to meet the performance or capability requirements. There are unacceptable weaknesses or deficiencies. Extreme doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform |
the proposed effort. The Offeror’s understanding of the project and soundness of approach is such that a major revision to the proposal would be necessary.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .