Attachment 4 PPQ Form.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OEHE GIS Support Services
- Solicitation number
- 75H70125R00030
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) form for a construction contract with the Indian Health Service (IHS). The form provides a standardized template for evaluating contractor performance across multiple categories including quality, schedule, cost control, management, small business utilization, and regulatory compliance. The rating system includes six performance levels: Exceptional, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, and Not Applicable, with detailed definitions for each rating that assess the contractor's ability to meet contractual requirements and address problems.
The related federal contract opportunity is a single-award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for GIS Support Services, solicitation number 75H70125R00030. The project is a 100% small business set-aside with a tiered evaluation prioritizing Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise (ISBEE), then woman-owned small businesses, and finally other small businesses. The contract's scope includes GIS implementation support for the Office of Environmental Health and Engineering (OEHE) Program, with tasks involving feature service schemas, quality assurance, policy development, app creation, portal maintenance, technical support, and training. The contract will be a Firm Fixed Price type with a base year and four one-year options, not exceeding 5.5 years total, under NAICS code 541330 with a $47 million size standard.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B05 Amendment 4.pdf | ||
| Amendment 3 Attachment 2 Rate Schedule v2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B01 25R00030 v3.pdf | ||
| B05 Amendment 3.pdf | ||
| Amendment 3 Attachment 1 RFI Response 1-209.pdf | ||
| Amendment 3 Attachment 3 Technical Experience Form v2.docx | DOCX document | |
| B05 Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| B01 25R00030 v2.pdf | ||
| B05 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| DSFC_GIS_Utility_DataDictionary_Schema_BlankGDB.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amendment 1 Attachment 2 DSFC GIS Utility Data Dictionary 20230818.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 Attachment 1 RFI Response 1-147.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 Attachment 3 DSFC GIS Utility Data Dictionary - Fields For Completion 20230818.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B01 25R00030.pdf | ||
| B01 25R00030.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 IHS IEE Representation Form_Jan 2022.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Rate Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 Technical Experience Form.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions to client:
The contractor is proposing for a construction contract with Indian Health Service https://www.ihs.gov/ You are requested to complete this form, sign, and return it to the contractor so it may be submitted with their proposal.
PART I CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete)
Contractor Name:
Project Title
Award Value
Period of Performance
| Prime Contractor or Subcontractor |
| ☐ Prime ☐ Subcontractor |
Agency or Entity Name and Address
PART II PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Client to complete)
Name / Title
Phone #
Email Address
Contract Type
Signature
Instructions: Please select the adjective rating that best reflects your evaluation of the contractor’s performance. See Part III for rating guidance.
| Category |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality
Schedule
Cost Control
Management
Small Business
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| Regulatory Compliance | |||||
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| Comments (expand as needed) |
PART III RATING GUIDANCE
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| NOTE |
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (G) Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .