Attachment 4 PPIF.pdf
PDF 147 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FA452824R0011 - SABER IDIQ Minot AFB
- Solicitation number
- FA452824R0011
About this file
This document is a Past and Present Performance Information Form (PPIF) that is part of the solicitation for the FA452824R0011 - SABER IDIQ Minot AFB contract opportunity. The PPIF is used to gather information about the contractor's past performance on similar contracts.
The key details include:
- This is an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract for construction, sustainment, restoration and modernization projects at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota.
- The contract has a $9.9 million ceiling and individual task orders will range from $2,000 to $750,000.
- The contract is a 100% small business set-aside.
- The PPIF requests information on the contractor's performance in areas such as management, quality control, schedule, cost, and responsiveness. Respondents are asked to rate the contractor's performance on a scale of Exceptional to Unsatisfactory.
- The completed PPIF forms should be emailed to the specified government points of contact.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment - FA452824R00110004.pdf | ||
| Amendment - FA452824R00110003.pdf | ||
| Amendment - FA452824R00110001.pdf | ||
| 24R0011 QnAs.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment - FA452824R00110002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 SABER SOW Updated.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9 B445 Seed SoW and Drawings Updated.pdf | ||
| 24R0011 QnAs.docx | DOCX document | |
| 24R0011 QnAs.docx | DOCX document | |
| 24R0011 QnAs.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment FA452824R00110001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| 24R0011 QnAs.docx | DOCX document | |
| 24R0011 QnAs.docx | DOCX document | |
| 24R0011 QnAs.docx | DOCX document | |
| 24R0011 QnAs.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 7 Price Schedule Coefficients.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 5 Financial Resp.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 SABER SoW.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 Seed Offeror Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 SABER Master Specs.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA452824R0011.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9 B445 Seed SoW and Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 WD DBAs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 Section L and M.pdf |
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104 WHEN FILLED IN
FA4528-24-R-0011
Attachment 4
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM (PPIF)
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name: __________________ Telephone : __________________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
Project Title and Detailed Description of Work: ______________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name and Title of Evaluator: ____________________________
Company Name: ______________________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number: ______________________ _____________________________ Email Address: ______________________
C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
EMAIL: scott.stauffer@us.af.mil and francesco.haydo@us.af.mil DUTY PHONE: (701) 723-7499 and (701) 723-3556
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E G S M U N
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E G S M U N
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Followed approved quality control plan.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9. Identified problems as they occurred.
The contractor: E G S M U N
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12. Developed realistic progress schedules.
13. Met established project schedules.
14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15. Was responsive to contract changes.
16. Provided adequate project supervision.
17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
24. Is the contractor rated in CCASS? YES/NO
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER ______________
Remarks:______________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .