Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf

PDF 808 KB Posted

Attached to
USAFCENT Awards and Decoration Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA480322R0008
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for awards and decorations services for the United States Air Forces Central Command. The contractor shall provide all management, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, labor and other items and services necessary to operate the Ninth Air Force Decoration Processing Unit. The unit serves as the focal point for individual decoration and unit award actions within the US Central Command area of responsibility. The anticipated contract period is one year with four one-year option periods, beginning 31 December 2022. This is a lowest price technically acceptable acquisition set aside for 8(a) small businesses. Proposals are due no later than 2:00 pm Eastern on 28 September 2022 and will be evaluated for technical acceptability and price.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USAFCENT Awards and Decoration Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation_22R0008_Awards and Decoration Services.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Wage Determination 15-4439.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 QASP.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

20th FIGHTER WING (ACC)

SHAW AIR FORCE BASE SOUTH CAROLINA

Victory By Valor

17 May 2022

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

MEMORANDUM FOR WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

FROM: 20 CONS/PKA

321 CULLEN ST

SHAW AFB SC 29152-5105

Subject: Request for Performance Information, Solicitation# FA480322R0008 Awards and Decorations Services

1. One of the integral considerations in proposal evaluations is the verification of the offeror's past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. This effort, solicitation number FA480322R0008, is for Awards and Decorations Services for USAFCENT, Shaw AFB, SC. We depend upon information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand· experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of their performance. Therefore, we request that the attached questionnaire be completed concerning the offeror's present/past performance.

2. Our areas of interest are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. You are urged to submit your comments on similar programs for which your activity has contracts or administers contracts with the offeror. Any additional information that you think would benefit Shaw AFB, SC in our evaluation of the offeror' s proposals would be appreciated. Please note we may contact the offeror on problem areas or concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken.

3. Your Past Performance questionnaire(s) are to be completed and returned by: 2:00 PM EST on 17 June 2022 to:

20 CONS/PKA

Attn: Shaunannette Watson 321 Cullen St.

Shaw AFB SC 29152-5105

Mark documents “SENSITIVE/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" Completed questionnaires may be to shaunannette.watson@us.af.mil.

4. If additional information is required, please contact, Ms. Shaunannette Watson at (803) 895-5396, or TSgt Jackson Woods at jackson.woods@us.af.mil or (803) 895-9434.

JACKSON C. WOODS

Contracting Officer

Attachment 4

FA4803R220008

mailto:shaunannette.watson@us.af.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA480322R0008

Awards and Decorations Services

1. Please complete this questionnaire. The following is an explanation of the evaluation codes: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Evaluator please complete the following:

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________ B. Subcontractor: _____________________________________________________________ C. Contract number: ____ ___________________________________ D. Total annual contract dollar amount: _______________________________ E. Period of Performance: From: ________ To: ___________ Exercised Option Periods: ______________________________________________________ F. Description of services being performed:

1. How well did management work to resolve problems encountered throughout the performance of the contract.

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Narrative: _________________________________________________________________________________

2. How well did the contractor demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA480322R0008

Awards and Decorations Services personnel during the contract period?

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Narrative:

3. How well did the home office participate in solving significant local problems?

1 2 3 4 5

UNKNOWN

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

4. How well did the contractor provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?

UNKNOWN NO LIMITED SATISFACTORY SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE CONFIDENCE CONFIDENCE CONFIDENCE CONFIDENCE

5. How well did the contractor comply with all regulations and guidelines?

CONFIDENCE

NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

6. How effective was the contractor’s quality control program.

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

7. Did the contractor correct deficiencies in a timely manner in accordance with their quality control procedures?

Narrative: _________________________________________________________________________________

8. Based on your judgment of the contractor’s performance, would you award the contractor another contract?

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

9. Did management personnel have sufficient experience to accomplish the requirements of the contract?

CONFIDENCE

NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

10. Please rate the contractor’s demonstrated ability on this contract in each of the following service areas (if applicable). “Satisfactory” needs no further explanation; however, if possible, please provide a short explanatory narrative for performance deemed Unknown Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence.

a. Did contractor exhibit ability to identify and correct non-compliance issues or internal concerns (i.e.

management, personnel, scheduling, and quality issues)?

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

b. The contractor prevents unacceptable performance?

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

c. During the course of the contract, was notification sent to contractor identifying unsatisfactory work:

[ ] Yes [ ] No Narrative: _________________________________________________________________________________

d. If answered, was immediate action taken by contractor to correct the situation? [ ] Yes [ ] No

e. How well did contractor meet required deadlines?

CONFIDENCE

NO

CONFIDENCE

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

f. How well did contractor respond to contract changes?

CONFIDENCE

NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Please check “yes” or “no” to the following questions:

11. Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, a suspension of payment, or had a claim denied?

[ ] Yes (if Yes, please explain) [ ] No Narrative: _________________________________________________________________________________

RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

A. Name(s):

B. Phone Number(s):

C. Position/Duty Title :

Name of reviewer (print);_______________________________________________

Location _____________________________________________________________

Telephone Number _____________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .