Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf
PDF 808 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USAFCENT Awards and Decoration Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA480322R0008
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for awards and decorations services for the United States Air Forces Central Command. The contractor shall provide all management, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, labor and other items and services necessary to operate the Ninth Air Force Decoration Processing Unit. The unit serves as the focal point for individual decoration and unit award actions within the US Central Command area of responsibility. The anticipated contract period is one year with four one-year option periods, beginning 31 December 2022. This is a lowest price technically acceptable acquisition set aside for 8(a) small businesses. Proposals are due no later than 2:00 pm Eastern on 28 September 2022 and will be evaluated for technical acceptability and price.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation_22R0008_Awards and Decoration Services.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Wage Determination 15-4439.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 DD254.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 QASP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
20th FIGHTER WING (ACC)
SHAW AIR FORCE BASE SOUTH CAROLINA
Victory By Valor
17 May 2022
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
MEMORANDUM FOR WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
FROM: 20 CONS/PKA
321 CULLEN ST
SHAW AFB SC 29152-5105
Subject: Request for Performance Information, Solicitation# FA480322R0008 Awards and Decorations Services
1. One of the integral considerations in proposal evaluations is the verification of the offeror's past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. This effort, solicitation number FA480322R0008, is for Awards and Decorations Services for USAFCENT, Shaw AFB, SC. We depend upon information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand· experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of their performance. Therefore, we request that the attached questionnaire be completed concerning the offeror's present/past performance.
2. Our areas of interest are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. You are urged to submit your comments on similar programs for which your activity has contracts or administers contracts with the offeror. Any additional information that you think would benefit Shaw AFB, SC in our evaluation of the offeror' s proposals would be appreciated. Please note we may contact the offeror on problem areas or concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken.
3. Your Past Performance questionnaire(s) are to be completed and returned by: 2:00 PM EST on 17 June 2022 to:
20 CONS/PKA
Attn: Shaunannette Watson 321 Cullen St.
Shaw AFB SC 29152-5105
Mark documents “SENSITIVE/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" Completed questionnaires may be to shaunannette.watson@us.af.mil.
4. If additional information is required, please contact, Ms. Shaunannette Watson at (803) 895-5396, or TSgt Jackson Woods at jackson.woods@us.af.mil or (803) 895-9434.
JACKSON C. WOODS
Contracting Officer
Attachment 4
FA4803R220008
mailto:shaunannette.watson@us.af.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA480322R0008
Awards and Decorations Services
1. Please complete this questionnaire. The following is an explanation of the evaluation codes: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
1 2 3 4 5
UNKNOWN
CONFIDENCE
NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
SUBSTANTIAL
CONFIDENCE
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Evaluator please complete the following:
A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________ B. Subcontractor: _____________________________________________________________ C. Contract number: ____ ___________________________________ D. Total annual contract dollar amount: _______________________________ E. Period of Performance: From: ________ To: ___________ Exercised Option Periods: ______________________________________________________ F. Description of services being performed:
1. How well did management work to resolve problems encountered throughout the performance of the contract.
1 2 3 4 5
UNKNOWN
CONFIDENCE
NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
SUBSTANTIAL
CONFIDENCE
Narrative: _________________________________________________________________________________
2. How well did the contractor demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA480322R0008
Awards and Decorations Services personnel during the contract period?
CONFIDENCE
NO
CONFIDENCE
LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
Narrative:
3. How well did the home office participate in solving significant local problems?
1 2 3 4 5
UNKNOWN
CONFIDENCE
NO
CONFIDENCE
LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
4. How well did the contractor provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?
UNKNOWN NO LIMITED SATISFACTORY SUBSTANTIAL
CONFIDENCE CONFIDENCE CONFIDENCE CONFIDENCE CONFIDENCE
5. How well did the contractor comply with all regulations and guidelines?
CONFIDENCE
NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
6. How effective was the contractor’s quality control program.
CONFIDENCE
NO
CONFIDENCE
LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
7. Did the contractor correct deficiencies in a timely manner in accordance with their quality control procedures?
Narrative: _________________________________________________________________________________
8. Based on your judgment of the contractor’s performance, would you award the contractor another contract?
CONFIDENCE
NO
CONFIDENCE
LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
9. Did management personnel have sufficient experience to accomplish the requirements of the contract?
CONFIDENCE
NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
10. Please rate the contractor’s demonstrated ability on this contract in each of the following service areas (if applicable). “Satisfactory” needs no further explanation; however, if possible, please provide a short explanatory narrative for performance deemed Unknown Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence.
a. Did contractor exhibit ability to identify and correct non-compliance issues or internal concerns (i.e.
management, personnel, scheduling, and quality issues)?
CONFIDENCE
NO
CONFIDENCE
LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
b. The contractor prevents unacceptable performance?
CONFIDENCE
NO
CONFIDENCE
LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
c. During the course of the contract, was notification sent to contractor identifying unsatisfactory work:
[ ] Yes [ ] No Narrative: _________________________________________________________________________________
d. If answered, was immediate action taken by contractor to correct the situation? [ ] Yes [ ] No
e. How well did contractor meet required deadlines?
CONFIDENCE
NO
CONFIDENCE
LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
f. How well did contractor respond to contract changes?
CONFIDENCE
NO CONFIDENCE LIMITED
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
Please check “yes” or “no” to the following questions:
11. Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, a suspension of payment, or had a claim denied?
[ ] Yes (if Yes, please explain) [ ] No Narrative: _________________________________________________________________________________
RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE
A. Name(s):
B. Phone Number(s):
C. Position/Duty Title :
Name of reviewer (print);_______________________________________________
Location _____________________________________________________________
Telephone Number _____________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .