Attachment 4_Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 241 KB Posted

Attached to
Jet Edge Preventative Maintenance and Emergency Repairs Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KF25Q0036
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal

About this file

This Past Performance Questionnaire relates to a solicitation for Jet Edge Preventative Maintenance and Emergency Repairs at Anniston Army Depot (Solicitation Number W911KF-25-Q-0036). The document is designed to collect performance feedback from previous contractors, with the questionnaire to be submitted to Sara Young, Contract Specialist, via email by the solicitation's closing date. The form includes a detailed rating scale ranging from "Excellent" to "Poor" across multiple performance categories, including customer satisfaction, schedule adherence, technical requirements, and technical responsiveness. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and narrative assessments of the contractor's performance, with an emphasis on compliance, actual performance, problems encountered, and problem resolution.

The questionnaire is marked as SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION under 41 U.S.C. 423, requiring careful handling. It provides a structured method for evaluating a contractor's past performance, with rating options that include Excellent (superior performance with inconsequential exceptions), Good (highly satisfactory with rare exceptions), Adequate (generally satisfactory), Marginal (occasionally unsatisfactory), Poor (frequently unsatisfactory), and Unknown. The form is to be completed by a point of contact who can provide detailed insights into the contractor's performance across various operational dimensions.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Jet Edge Preventative Maintenance and Emergency Repairs, newest first.
File Type Posted
W911KF25Q0036-03.pdf PDF
W911KF25Q0036-02.pdf PDF
W911KF25Q0036-01.pdf PDF
Attachment 3_Evaluation Criteria.pdf PDF
Attachment 1_SOW - Jet Edge.pdf PDF
W911KF25Q0036.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 Evidence of Authority To Sign Offers.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W911KF-25-Q-0036

Past Performance Questionnaire This Questionnaire relates to solicitation requirements for

Jet Edge Preventative Maintenance and Emergency Repairs

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE –

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.

Please complete this Questionnaire and submit via e-mail.

Director of Contracting Anniston Army Depot 7 Frankford Ave.

Anniston, AL 36201-4199

ATTN: Sara Young, Contract Specialist E-mail: sara.b.young.civ@army.mil

Desired Response Date is the closing date of this solicitation.

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

Proposed prime contractor

1. OFFEROR NAME OFFEROR ADDRESS

Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire

2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:

3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

4. COMPLETION DATE:

5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):

6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:

mailto:sara.b.young.civ@mail.mil

8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:

Company/Agency Name and Address:

Name of person completing this questionnaire:

Title:

Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:

Phone Number:

E-Mail:

Rating Scale:

EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.

GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.

ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.

MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance.

Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.

POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.

UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.

9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to Detail and Quality Assurance.

A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.

B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.

C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to contract specifications:

D. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:

Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown

Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown

Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown

E. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.

Past Performance Questionnaire

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .