Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 342 KB Posted

Attached to
Resilience Center and HAWC Admin Services
Solicitation number
FA441725R0010
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past/Present Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 4) for solicitation FA441725R0010. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractor performance across four key areas: quality of contract adherence, management capabilities, regulatory compliance, and reliability of deliverables.

The form requires detailed information about both the contractor and respondent, including company names, points of contact, contract numbers, and project details. Performance is rated on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory (or Not Available) across multiple criteria. The evaluation includes assessment of contract requirements fulfillment, management effectiveness, compliance with financial/environmental/safety/labor standards, and timeliness of deliverables. The questionnaire must be submitted to SSgt Dani English or 1st Lt Rowna Thom by the solicitation closing date and time. The document is marked as source selection sensitive information under FAR 2.101 & 3.104.

View the file

Other files

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA441725R0010

ATTACHMENT 4

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 1

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

1. Contractor’s Name and Address:

2. Point of Contact:

3. Phone Number:

4. Contract Number: Contract Type:

5. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)

1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:

2. Respondent’s Name:

3. Phone Number: Fax Number:

E-Mail:

4. Award Amount: Final Amount:

5. Project Title: Project Number:

7. Period of Performance:

Start Date: End Date:

SECTION C: EMAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO:

6. Brief Project Description:

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA441725R0010

ATTACHMENT 4

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 2

Contract Specialist: SSgt Dani English

Email: dani.english@us.af.mil

Contracting Officer: 1st Lt Rowna Thom

Email: rowan.thom.1@us.af.mil

THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: The closing date and time of solicitation.

SECTION D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL RATINGS.

E V S M U N

Exceptional (Outstanding)

Very Good (Above Average)

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Available

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA441725R0010

ATTACHMENT 4

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 3

1. QUALITY: Performance adhered to contract requirements.

☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. MANAGEMENT: Provided experienced, managers, and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements. Adequately coordinate and controlled performance of subcontractors. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems.

☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

3. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: Contractor complied with Financial, Environmental, Safety, and Reporting Requirements. Contractor was compliant with labor standards, posting of EEO, labor rates, minimum wage.

Payrolls were completed properly and received in a timely matter. No safety discrepancies were noted.

☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA441725R0010

ATTACHMENT 4

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 4

4. RELIABILITY: Contractor provided all deliverables by the date and time established in the contract.

☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

5. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? ☐YES ☐NO

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available

Signature of Respondent: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .