Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Janitorial Services for SRS Wildlife Lab Nacogdoches, TX
Solicitation number
12445024Q0037
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a janitorial services contract with the USDA Forest Service. The contract was held by B&S Luxe LLC for janitorial services at the Bent Creek location, with a contract period of 4/2022 - 04/2026.

The questionnaire asks the respondent to rate the contractor's performance on various criteria such as providing qualified personnel, quality control, problem identification and resolution, and overall performance. The respondent is also asked whether the contractor was ever issued a cure or show cause notice, and if they would award another contract to this contractor. The document indicates this is source selection sensitive information per FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
12445024Q0037 Amendment 2 Q_and_A.pdf PDF
12445024Q0037_Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf PDF
Combined SS RFQ Nacogdoches Janitorial.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 Schedule of Items Nacogdoches Janitorial.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 SOW Nacogdoches Janitorial Services.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Experience Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5 DOL Wage Determination Nacogdoches TX 2015-5279.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

12445024Q0002 USDA-Forest Service, SRS Bent Creek Janitorial

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: B&S Luxe LLC

Address: One Gateway Center Suite 2600 Newark, NJ 07102

Brief Description of Work: Janitorial Services - Routine maintenance cleaning of professional and scientific spaces

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: 140G0122P0145

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: 4/2022 – 04/2026

The contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Telephone Number:

Email Address:

C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on a scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Alternatively, select N/A where appropriate.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1
2
3
4
5
N/A
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
NEUTRAL or N/A
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

Performance met contractual requirements.

There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved promptly and effectively.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.

Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

There is no record of past performance, the record is inconclusive, or the rated area is not applicable.

1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
2.
The home office participated in solving significant local problems.
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
3.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
4.
Corrected deficiencies promptly and according to their quality control procedures.
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
5.
Identified problems as they occurred.
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
6.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
7.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
8.
Cooperated with Government personnel after the award.
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
9.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
10.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain the outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO/ Unknown
11.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO

Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .