Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 48 KB Posted

Attached to
Transportation Services
Solicitation number
W9133L24R3084
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire used by the National Guard Bureau as part of a competitive source selection for Solicitation W9133L24R3804. The purpose is to evaluate offerors' past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts related to NAICS code 541519.

The questionnaire requests candid responses from points of contact about an offeror's past performance in the areas of compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness of deliverables, and customer satisfaction. Respondents are asked to provide a performance confidence rating (Substantial Confidence, Neutral, or No Confidence) along with a rationale for each rating. The completed questionnaires will be used in the evaluation and award of the federal contract.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU

111 SOUTH GEORGE MASON DRIVE ARLINGTON VA 22204-1373

NGB-AQ-C 02 April 2024

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment for Solicitation W9133L24R3804

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army National Guard Bureau is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 541519. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Submit your completed questionnaire to Sophie Chen at sophie.chen4.civ@army.mil and Paul Brown at paul.d.brown212.civ@army.mil.

Questions may be directed to the aforementioned Contracts Specialist and Contracting Officer working the subject procurement effort. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely, Paul Brown Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral: No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonable assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

No Confidence: Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Substantial Confidence

· Neutral

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to following email addresses:

Sophie Chen at sophie.chen4.civ@army.mil and Paul Brown at paul.d.brown212.civ@army.mil.

Thank you for your assistance.

image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .